Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

Don't think it changes anything.

Part of the statutory responsibility of the administrator is settling secured creditors (Whyte), prior to achieving the best outcome for the remaining creditors (HMRC). Selling Ibrox to someone who wants to use it as a football ground is the best, and perhaps only way to generate substantial sums for the creditors. Whyte will be first in line.

If the administrator is able to show that an orderly sale in a pre-pack is likely to be better for creditors than waiting for a liquidation, then the court could authorise such an arrangement although you would expect HMRC to challenge such a pre-pack.

Edited by MacWatt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

oruhqo.jpg

I think it's clear that the Queen actually f***ing hates Rangers. Why else would she direct her department of revenue and customs to destroy them? That's why she hasn't passed the crown to Charles yet. Once Rangers are no more she'll abdicate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone know what the rules are for gaining preferred creditor status? If, for example, it could be shown that Whyte used money borrowed on future season ticket revenue to pay off the Lloyds Bank debt could he lose preferred status?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't think it changes anything.

Part of the statutory responsibility of the administrator is settling secured creditors (Whyte), prior to achieving the best outcome for the remaining creditors (HMRC). Selling Ibrox to someone who wants to use it as a football ground is the best, and perhaps only way to generate substantial sums for the creditors. Whyte will be first in line.

If the administrator is able to show that an orderly sale in a pre-pack is likely to be better for creditors than waiting for a liquidation, then the court could authorise such an arrangement although you would expect HMRC to challenge such a pre-pack.

I think this is turning into a mind game between whyte and HMRC. Even if whyte has preferred creditor status what good is a football stadium if you do not have a team that will attract sufficient fans at the right ticket prices to fill it?

Even if HMRC cannot get their hands on Ibrox they can probably fuck up RFC enough that they simply cannot come out the other side with minimal damage (ie 10 points deduction and nothing else). As has been stated elsewhere, whilst Ranger,s fans and the Scottish sports media may think RFC is the centre of the universe HMRC will not view them as such - more likely as a potential stick to beat other like-minded clubs with.

If the debt ends up being, say £60 million, and HMRC are offered 5p - 10p in the £ then I think they will use their position to block a CVA with the risk of losing £3m - £6m. Whyte maybe ends up with Ibrox but with a club that's not in the SPL; not an overly attractive proposition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know - but their league membership/share was transferred to another company. Opposed to Airdrieonians - who were liquidated but their membership simply 'lapsed'.

I'm pretty sure your speculation is right, it's an absolute disgrace.

A liquidation motion would be interesting though, in that it presumably limits the SPL's room for manoeuvre, if not much work has been done on establishing a new company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whyte maybe ends up with Ibrox but with a club that's not in the SPL; not an overly attractive proposition.

It still hasn't been explained how this would happen, though. Whyte (or someone else) can take or buy Ibrox and form a completely new club, and try to get admitted right into SPL (which would probably happen). Or they can take or buy the league share and thus continue on in SPL, with SPL permission (which again would probably happen).

Ibrox, Murray Park and the league share only have value as footballing assets, afterall.

Edited by HibeeJibee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is turning into a mind game between whyte and HMRC. Even if whyte has preferred creditor status what good is a football stadium if you do not have a team that will attract sufficient fans at the right ticket prices to fill it?

Even if HMRC cannot get their hands on Ibrox they can probably fuck up RFC enough that they simply cannot come out the other side with minimal damage (ie 10 points deduction and nothing else). As has been stated elsewhere, whilst Ranger,s fans and the Scottish sports media may think RFC is the centre of the universe HMRC will not view them as such - more likely as a potential stick to beat other like-minded clubs with.

If the debt ends up being, say £60 million, and HMRC are offered 5p - 10p in the £ then I think they will use their position to block a CVA with the risk of losing £3m - £6m. Whyte maybe ends up with Ibrox but with a club that's not in the SPL; not an overly attractive proposition.

...but the SPL will risk permanent paralysis by contorting themselves into whatever obscure gymnastic position is necessary, to allow "new" Rangers to continue undisturbed. Have no doubt about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think this is turning into a mind game between whyte and HMRC. Even if whyte has preferred creditor status what good is a football stadium if you do not have a team that will attract sufficient fans at the right ticket prices to fill it?

Even if HMRC cannot get their hands on Ibrox they can probably f**k up RFC enough that they simply cannot come out the other side with minimal damage (ie 10 points deduction and nothing else). As has been stated elsewhere, whilst Ranger,s fans and the Scottish sports media may think RFC is the centre of the universe HMRC will not view them as such - more likely as a potential stick to beat other like-minded clubs with.

If the debt ends up being, say £60 million, and HMRC are offered 5p - 10p in the £ then I think they will use their position to block a CVA with the risk of losing £3m - £6m. Whyte maybe ends up with Ibrox but with a club that's not in the SPL; not an overly attractive proposition.

A FC Rangers phoenix club could easily take Rangers FC's place in the SPL. It only takes the 6 members of the SPL board to ok it, and they are unlikely to vote for expulsion when it would mean reduced revenue for their clubs. They would however be banned from Europe for 3 years. Where they would play is another question...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...but the SPL will risk permanent paralysis by contorting themselves into whatever obscure gymnastic position is necessary, to allow "new" Rangers to continue undisturbed. Have no doubt about that.

Maybe but as I understand SPL rules only 2 clubs would need to oppose any proposal to veto it. I would suggest (at least) whichever club that would be saved from relegation by Rangers getiing turfed out of SPL plus Mad Vlad. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A FC Rangers phoenix club could easily take Rangers FC's place in the SPL. It only takes the 6 members of the SPL board to ok it, and they are unlikely to vote for expulsion when it would mean reduced revenue for their clubs. They would however be banned from Europe for 3 years. Where they would play is another question...

Hampden?

Ibrox only has particular re-sale value as a football stadium. It's not as if there's any shortage of developable land in that part of Glasgow... and it's got a listed stand, that can't be demolished.

Maybe but as I understand SPL rules only 2 clubs would need to oppose any proposal to veto it. I would suggest (at least) whichever club that would be saved from relegation by Rangers getiing turfed out of SPL plus Mad Vlad. :P

All the papers are saying a transfer of league share is an SPL Board matter, though, apparently settled upon a simple majority?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...