Monkey Tennis Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Yep - Rangers cheated. Everyone, except Rangers and their fans, understands this to be the truth of the matter. Think about that......EVERYONE, except the guilty (surprise surprise) In fairness, even some Rangers fans know and accept exactly what the EBT s really were. Bennett made a post saying the beauty of the arrangement was that they got away with what was obviously a means of paying wages rather than giving loans. It is/was in someone's signature. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 If you know, why ask? Enlighten me 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K Dodd Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Still unbeaten in the league. How is that treble working out for you? Still unbeaten in europe. Hows that workin out for you? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 If you know, why ask? Oh, I think he knows, alright. As do most of us who have actually attempted to join a few dots over the course of this long-running entertainment. Your statement: So although the club got its knuckles rapped for non declaration, the loans should in principle be repayable, which might be a little bit difficult given the current circumstances of the old company. Would suggest that you don't. Unsurprisingly, as the only concern many berrz had was over keeping their precious titles - as if they'd had any input to the haul apart from watching from the sidelines. I've left your wee smilie in there, as it looks as if you are laughing at your own ignorance. Oh, and why would the club get its knuckles rapped? Surely it was the company getting up to the naughties? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beermonkey Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 (edited) When you willfully arrange player contracts to avoid tax liabilities (eg higher costs) so you can give them higher salaries, it means you would not have been able to afford said players in the first place. Without those players your chances of success would have been reduced. Willfully declaring costs at a substantially lower figure than is actually true misrepresents the trading position of the organisation in a manner to attract further investment and/or funding under false pretences. Failure to declare the dual nature of these contracts was contrary to the rules at that time. Willful failure to comply with and adhere to the rules of a governing body or its competitions is ..... cheating. Yep - Rangers cheated. Everyone, except Rangers and their fans, understands this to be the truth of the matter. Think about that......EVERYONE, except the guilty (surprise surprise) Oh they know alright. Edited March 2, 2014 by beermonkey 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 You've got a fucking cheek on you haven't you posting that discumbobulated diatribe as a response to getting yer arse posteriorally appropriate sedentary muscle handed back to you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingrodent Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Why? If all the recipients paid back the so called loans, the creditors of Rangers 1872 would get some money back. Just out of a matter of interest, Why didn't David Murray call in these loans when Rangers were in £30m debt and had loaned out £47m? That's surely the central question here. Oh my, it is a mystery and a puzzle and an enigma - if Rangers were in fatal financial distress, why not call in these massive cash loans? Answer: Because they weren't loans. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 McMadeupnames latest. http://www.philmacgiollabhain.ie/game-on-2/#more-4429 getting quite specific with his offerings. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingrodent Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Phil's record on predictions is a good bit less than 50-50, I'd say, but let's at least recognise that if New Rangers enter administration for the first time due to massive financial skullduggery, they are at least carrying on the traditions of the old, dead club. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 WRK or WKR? Hmmmmmmm............... Dave J recently claimed that the WKR had mental health issues, so i just let him ramble on now. It's really not worth arguing with him.... -7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Phil's record on predictions is a good bit less than 50-50, I'd say, but let's at least recognise that if New Rangers enter administration for the first time due to massive financial skullduggery, they are at least carrying on the traditions of the old, dead club. The little Phil who cried wolf. -3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeddyBears Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 So whens Ill Phil predicting administration number 12352? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingrodent Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 So whens Ill Phil predicting administration number 12352? This week, apparently. And it's administration number 1, by the way - your club has never been in administration before. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weirdcal Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 If the ramblings about the loan being for PAYE are true (not saying they are) would that mean laxey partners and an easdale now have creditor status rather than HMRC so in an admin event HMRC can't veto a CVA again? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 This week, apparently. And it's administration number 1, by the way - your club has never been in administration before. Tomorrow according to some greenyins on facebook. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeddyBears Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 This week, apparently. And it's administration number 1, by the way - your club has never been in administration before. I was posting about the number of predictions there has been. This week eh? I'll try to keep an eye out for that one happening..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingrodent Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Tomorrow according to some greenyins on facebook. Probably optimistic, but you never know. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 That's not what wrote though ... but don't fret we understand since you're obviously a bit of a simpleton. Lol...... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CityDave Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 Jim Traynor is back on BBC Scotland next Saturday with Your Call. Go easy on him now, he's been through a traumatic experience. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheTeddyBears Posted March 2, 2014 Share Posted March 2, 2014 That's not what wrote though ... but don't fret we understand since you're obviously a bit of a simpleton. Erm...I'm struggling to make sense of this post. Simpleton you say? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.