P45 Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Any word on the warchest? McCoist has got more of a saggy chest. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeeHectorPar Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Or, as those charming chaps from Vanguard Bears put it: http://www.vanguardb...eckons-you-no12 [warning, do not read during meals] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymores Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 When does the ban start and finish - Is it 1st September? 1sept -31 August. How the fig does this even equate to integrity........................the original sanction was cos you had done bad and were untrustworthy. BUT NOW YOU ARE TRUSTWORTHY UNTIL 31 AUGUST SO FILL YER BOOTS PISH 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WBR Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 So it looks like it's to be treated as the same company. What will future punishments be for the BTC? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymores Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Does that not effectively just mean that they're prevented from bringing in players during the window of January 2013? read above - a wimp oot 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P45 Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Do you really think they will? If it's a condition of the membership then I think they will. It's a massive slap in the face for the Rangers fans and IMO much more humiliating than a 12 month transfer ban or even going to Division 3. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adundeemonkey Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 (edited) What an utter disgrace. So effectively they are getting no ban. As someone has said previously, the deadline will be September 2nd 2013 as the 1st is a Sunday. Have they no shame? And yet the Sevco fans will think this is a punishment. Even though i do not think they will last a season in Div 3, I am still annoyed at this as it is clear as day what is going on. After all they have done, they still get away with it. I hope the tribunal with a new Lord reject this arrangement as it is not lawful. Edited July 20, 2012 by adundeemonkey 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leepylee Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Does anyone else have the impression that cg sat in an office with the blazers and said right how can we make the diddy plebs THINK we're being punished ? I know let's give u a transfer ban ! WHIT but we need players !!!! That's awryt chaz we won't start the ban till the transfer windy shuts. Ok DEAL !!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highland Dogma Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Transfer ban is an irrelevance they have no cash to sign anyone but it does mean they avoid suspension or expulsion...until they go bust meh big whoop! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibeeJibee Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 (edited) Loss of titles could've happened whethered they'd accepted the conditions around transferring membership or not. As regards this evening's news... it strikes me as an OK outcome for all parties in the circumstances. It means everyone can get on with the season. It means Rangers haven't trumped the football rules through use of the law courts, albeit the fact that the ruling was found illegal should provide momentum to tighten-up the rules for the future. It allows Rangers to keep their history which is what all their fans want, but without avoiding sanction liability. And they fulfil 1yr transfer embargo as original tribunal felt appropriate. Reasonable outcome there for everyone. Edited July 20, 2012 by HibeeJibee 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meanmistermustard Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 The dates were probably agreed by the SFA and Green, along the lines of Green begging for help as they have a 'small' number at the moment and the SFA saying they have been banned for 2 transfer windows - well almost - and trying to look tough and competent yet failing miserably again. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeeHectorPar Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 It's strange that it affects them next summer rather than this summer. Lots of bigger signings than div 3 requires being signed for 2 years to tide them over ? Cinderella; "What expensive players you have, grandma". Big Bad Wolf; "All the better for me to go bust by next summer." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highland Dogma Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Does anyone else have the impression that cg sat in an office with the blazers and said right how can we make the diddy plebs THINK we're being punished ? I know let's give u a transfer ban ! WHIT but we need players !!!! That's awryt chaz we won't start the ban till the transfer windy shuts. Ok DEAL !!! Hughie wasn't there he was AWOL in Europe. More significant than the ban is how blase the sfa (under Ogilvy ) are about the financials...not for second do I believe a coherent business plan exists or that a proper due diligence can be passed 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtgilphead Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 One thing that no-one seems to have picked up on....... Look at the lists of seeded and unseeded clubs for the League Cup first round draw. If you were an unseeded club wanting to progress what would you want? Perhaps you would be wanting a home tie against the 15th seed (There were 30 clubs in the draw, so 15th seeds are nominally the weakest) Guess who were unseeded, and got a home tie against East Fife, who were the 15th seeds? That was lucky, eh! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibeeJibee Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 One thing that no-one seems to have picked up on....... Look at the lists of seeded and unseeded clubs for the League Cup first round draw. If you were an unseeded club wanting to progress what would you want? Perhaps you would be wanting a home tie against the 15th seed (There were 30 clubs in the draw, so 15th seeds are nominally the weakest) Guess who were unseeded, and got a home tie against East Fife, who were the 15th seeds? That was lucky, eh! Are you suggesting Alex Salmond was part of a conspiracy to give them easy passage into the Second Round ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeeHectorPar Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 What an utter disgrace. So effectively they are getting no ban. As someone has said previously, the deadline will be September 2nd 2013 as the 1st is a Monday. Have they no shame? And yet the Sevco fans will think this is a punishment. Even though i do not think they will last a season in Div 3, I am still annoyed at this as it is clear as day what is going on. After all they have done, they still get away with it. I hope the tribunal with a new Lord reject this arrangement as it is not lawful. What they're going to get are wânkers who are looking for big wages for an easy time. Will they get them? There's a twat born every minute. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeeHectorPar Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Are you suggesting Alex Salmond was part of a conspiracy to give them easy passage into the Second Round ? Warm balls, mibbe? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sooky Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 I don't mind this. It'll give us a good laugh when we hear what players the people on RM think they should be signing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 They'll be trying to get a team team together capable of winning Div 2 then, as they won't be able to recruit next summer. Mind you, they probably have that already.. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulo Sergio Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 I just seen the news on Sky Sports, what the f**k is that? Their transfer ban doesn't start until the transfer window finishes? What? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.