The Master Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 Talk of the vote tomorrow being postponed 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well Well Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 They were never told anything of the sort .. open your ears ya fud That is exactly what I heard..and who the f**k do you think you are..!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Araminta Moonbeam QC Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 Can we be clear - is the SFL vote postponed until next Thursday? 12th July? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rustyarabnuts Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 If the meeting tomorrow is adjourned , then thats it, scottish football is dead 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Master Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 Chris McLaughlin saying that the SPL might wait to see what the SFL say next week. But the SFL can't vote until the SFL have rejected NewCo, surely. F**king farce. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 There is only 42 clubs you bufoooooooon 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomDom Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 The SFL vote hasn't been "postponed". The vote was never happening today. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meanmistermustard Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 How the f~{& can tomorrows vote be adjourned? Cant someone grow some balls and make a move. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glasgow-sheep Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 There is only 42 clubs you bufoooooooon 41 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Araminta Moonbeam QC Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 So everyone's just passing the buck until time's up? Hoping they wither or die or we all give up and say 'Oh just let them in". Utter utter utter omnishambles. Fecking embarrassing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatshaft Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 That is exactly what I heard..and who the f**k do you think you are..!! Then you heard wrong. Hutton said that they we effectively told that, not literally told that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdo Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 Why is it a majority rather 75% as previously thought? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glasgow-sheep Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 Why is it a majority rather 75% as previously thought? Different interpretation of the rules? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Well Well Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 Then you heard wrong. Hutton said that they we effectively told that, not literally told that. Thanks for being civil about it, splitting hairs right enough 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rustyarabnuts Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 hope spency is right that some will oppose an adjournment 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 41 i know what I meant, just I'm a bufooon too....... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itzdrk Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 Jabba isnt all bad IMO -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yid_in_Exiile Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 Why is it a majority rather 75% as previously thought? 75% to change SFL rules - if needed to get them into SFL1 50% to vote any applicant into SFL 3 vacancy. Percentages of votes cast not of total SFL Club membership but rules apparently require everyone to vote (unless agreed prior that conflicted). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Araminta Moonbeam QC Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 Tom English speaking decently and honestly. Traynor speaking fluent bollix. Situation normal. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pride Of The Clyde Posted July 3, 2012 Share Posted July 3, 2012 Wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if the SPL tried to postpone their meeting. They're shamelessly trying to pass the buck on to the clubs of the SFL and will come out with some shit excuse despite having months of preparation. We really need a commission into how governance in Scottish football has failed so badly, and for the heads of the cronies of those in the SFA, SPL and SFL to start rolling. Im not sure here but do Rangers not need to be voted out of SPL before SFL clubs can vote regarding which league they will be playing in that is if their their application is successful. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.