Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!

[Claymores 271]

It might just go back and be deemed a suitable punishment after all. The Orcs have NOTHING to celebrate tonight. There is no way in hell that FIFA/UEFA will sit back and not do anything. Remember Sion!!

Time this boil on the arse of our game was lanced forever. Their arrogance knows no bounds.

Not according to the Court reporters who conveyed:

"The Court of Session ruled on Tuesday that the sanction was not available to the panel."

My understanding is that it has been sent back for them to consider an alternative sanction from those explicit within the Rules.

Edited May 29, 2012 by Claymores

[Well Well 262]

The question was:

"Anyone able to say what would likely happen if the SFA simply ignored todays judgement?"

You cannot simply ignore a judgement of the Court of Session.

Then the question is pointless really as they HAVE to review it. No one in their right mind will ignore the review findings and the question is pointless as there is 0% that it will happen.

Edited May 29, 2012 by Well Well

[chrismcarab 306]

Follow Follower's seem to think that the CVA hinges on R*ngers competing in all domestic competitions next season. Would that rule out a potential SC ban?

It certainly makes the whole timing of things very interesting. CVA delayed from yesterday for 'administrative adjustments' then CVA out today at 1.30pm detailing conditions of acceptance include participation in ALL competitions at the level they currently hold. Perhaps knowing all the while if they won they appeal at the CoS today, they would in effect put the SFA in a position of being unable to impose further sanctions.

If they expel them or kick them out the cup, the CVA goes dead and the blame for stewing creditors is placed at the SFA door by Green. Potentially a masterstroke of the highest slimiest unpalatable order and puts incredible pressure on the SFA in light of this. Using the court case as a deflection from the CVA but making the conditions known at 1.30pm in advance of the hearing announcement today really does smack of careful planning. Thoughts?

[makepeace 20]

I'm not contacting FIFA just yet.

Wee Sepp Blatter might be thinking:-

'Corrupt Scots?, yeah these African FA's are right, let's abolish Scottish fitba and let the English FA rule over them, Team GB's going ahead thanks to the thicko's at the BOA, so I could sweep all the shite out in a oner'

Hmm..

would that outcome not be such a bad thing? I mean if everything turns out to be as corrupt over this affair as we fear, then maybe our provincial setup being absorbed by te FA wouldnt be such a bad thing? no?

[stuart. 148]

Anyone think charles green may not be happy with this? Ra peepul will be demanding rino gatuso et al are signed now and this guy seems a bit of a tightwad?

[thelegendthatis 356]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-18255386

Any comment Mr Salmond? Time you stood up and spoke up about Rangers.

[ReasonableGeezer 71]

Some have taken it a little harder than others.

Maybe if you had listened to me all along it wouldn't have come as such a shock.

Finally we can now see that the SFA is biased against Rangers and handpicking Lord Carloway has come back and bitten them squarely on the arse

Biased against Rangers my arse.

They are biased TOWARDS Rangers. I hope fifa step in and make them expel your cheating thieving b*****d team from Scottish football forever.

SCOTLANDS SHAME!

[Paquis 84]

Then the question is pointless really as they HAVE to review it and during that review if they DECIDED (changed for ignore) after review that their judgement was correct then that is that. No one in their right mind will ignore the review findings and the question is pointless as there is 0% that it will happen.

If they decide that their judgement was correct then it is back to the CoS we go.

[williemillersmoustache 7,045]

1h Cara Sulieman ‏@carasulieman #rangers have won - the decision has been referred back to appeal tribunal.

My inherent revulsion to this statement was tempered by the fact that this is surely the very last time it'll be used in anger.

So the buns have successfully taken the SFA to court for the right to chose "or death". Fine by me. In fact jolly jolly good.

[7-2 5,416]

There is a section about the powers of a tribunal and they essentially can make up their own rules. This was the view that was upheld by the review tribunal, the CoS disagreed.

These are the sort of things that piss me off. Rangers signed up to those rules so should have had no leave to appeal. However, what we now basically have is one solicitor disagreeing with others. Whoopdeedoo. If they can't agree among themselves then a decision being right or wrong can't be made. It's only opinions and in this case more legal twats thought it was right than wrong. The whole appeals process is basically keep going until you hear what you want to hear so why cant the SFA appeal today's decision?

[Bryan 5]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-18248766

The last two paragraphs in this should make the SFA do something

[LordHawHaw 232]

Looks like yet another own goal for Rangers I'd say

[THE KING 794]

Not according to the Court reporters who conveyed:

"The Court of Session ruled on Tuesday that the sanction was not available to the panel."

My understanding is that it has been sent back for them to consider an alternative sanction from those explicit within the Rules.

correct .dont know why ra peepul are foaming at the mouth in joy at this..all that has happened isca judge had said ...mmm ban not on..go back and punish them with something else.

it has no reflection on the original guilty verdict.

[wunfellaff 1,193]

Why don't the SFA say 'fair do's', have your fine and thats it on that charge.

But.............................since then you have bbrought the game into far greater disrepute with EBT's and this nuclear thang , new charge, new meeting, new result, new within rules judgement, tattie

[Claymores 271]

Anyone think charles green may not be happy with this? Ra peepul will be demanding rino gatuso et al are signed now and this guy seems a bit of a tightwad?

Do remember they still can't sign anybody whilst in Administration. Earliest time for exist via CVA is 12 July, although I suppose he could newco tommorrow and start signing on June 1

[doulikefish 4,457]

This looks like it will rumble on into the new season

[No8. 1,107]

Anyone think charles green may not be happy with this? Ra peepul will be demanding rino gatuso et al are signed now and this guy seems a bit of a tightwad?

Rino has already said that money is not a factor and he will play for whatever. He is a millionaire many times over and wants to come 'Home' as his wife is from here and he loved his time in Scotland. I would think he would be a cheap option compared to say Edu or Davis who probably earn in the region of £40,000 pw between them

[Kyle 3,934]

Probably nothing Rangers can do but the Court of Session would probably take a rather dim view of it and they carry a much bigger stick than do Rangers.

But do the 'laws of the land' actually hold any weight regarding football? It's all a shunder.

[Well Well 262]

http://www.bbc.co.uk...w-west-18248766

The last two paragraphs in this should make the SFA do something

Yeah.... like completely back down and impose the most lenient sentence they can. They can then say to FIFA it was dealt with. Excuse my sarcasm but the SFA really are a bunch of comedians in this and it is so bloody embarrassing for everyone involved in Scottish Football with these muppets in charge.

[ReasonableGeezer 71]

Not according to the Court reporters who conveyed:

"The Court of Session ruled on Tuesday that the sanction was not available to the panel."

My understanding is that it has been sent back for them to consider an alternative sanction from those explicit within the Rules.

Wishful thinking on my part I think. Surely the ONLY option now is expulsion. After all the bleating that the SFA done after Fat Sally etc came out moaning about the "draconian" punishment. It has to be the only option. Even the deluded Traynor thinks this is an option (according to his comments on Radio Scotland news tonight)

I've heard that Glasgow Taxis are phoning their bosses and telling them in no uncertain terms to refuse to accept the CVA (they are creditors too as far as im aware).