Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

They didn't

Remember they had to get a provisional licence just to play Brechin in the cup

At the time of sale they were eligible, after the sale the assets were not viewed as a football club without a licence. Sevco never bought a football club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't Charles green issue a statement pretty similar to that when he was fleecing the hordes?

Ah! Charlie 'Chuckles'.

Ra people used to love old 'big hands' and his purchase of t'history.

At one point the filthy h****** used to cheer him at the stadium, not owned by the "mythical concept of the club".

Personally, he's still my favourite charlaton, but... The Glib one is coming up on the rails.

Yours

aDONis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah! Charlie 'Chuckles'. Ra people used to love old 'big hands' and his purchase of t'history. At one point the filthy h****** used to cheer him at the stadium, not owned by the "mythical concept of the club". Personally, he's still my favourite charlaton, but... The Glib one is coming up on the rails. Yours aDONis

We should have a poll. Actually we should have two:

Who is your favourite charlaton who has taken the pi$$ out of the rangers?

and

Which of the charlatans has taken the most advantage of the gullible hordes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need us back. It's that simple.

Back into the lowest tier for justice to be served, if a fraudulent transfer of assets took place.

Think of how the lower league teams will benefit. They did so well out of having a new version of Rangers the last time.

Your community spirit is to be applauded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you the junkie St.Mirren fan who makes FM videos?

Wee wisbit in his St mirren jammies getting told to keep it quiet from his mummy.

:lol: :lol:

This is utterly glorious.

Seriously, who in their right kind and actually talks like that?

Alot of fans believe that the titles won by Rangers during the period where they were over spending and signing players (including the use of EBTs) are tainted (I don't like that word but you get the meaning) as they were playing players they couldn't afford to gain an on field advantage.

Now I understand that alot of clubs have done this in the past but it was done to such a degree that Rangers eventually were liquidated. The fans then want to claim that club and company are separate and want to claim all the previous titles as well as starting out new with zero debt (other than that accrued since the Sevco formation).

I don't really understand the legalities but surely morally you can see why people may have issue with this?

It's basically wanting to take the titles, have the club accept no responsibility, and just carry on. If that were Celtic most of the Rangers fans defending this would be the first to jump the other way. The concept is utterly ludicrous.

The Club gained advantage due to the money spent but want none of the responsibility of that overspending. The EBT is just another thing that the fans of other clubs being unhappy to give credence to their argument (rightly or wrongly).

You can't seriously believe that these fans have no reason to be pissed about it? As I've said, if it wasn't your club going through it I'm pretty sure you'd be the same as them. I don't blame you for sticking up for your club (or whatever bracket you want to give it) but surely you can see why other fans might be more than a but pissed off?

Dont get me wrong, some may let this consume them but any Scottish football fan, regardless of their team should take an interest in this case.

Overspending, aye maybe bit but was it against SPL rules? Were we the only team to have debts? Hearts Dundee utd, abersheep etc have all recently carried large debts (most now replaced with soft loans) yet Rangers were singled out due to an orchestrated campaign which gained momentum.

Ebt's are despite what you read not against the law and as LNS stated did not breach SPL rules. Yet we're apparently to be punished again because the vocal minority are screaming and shouting. Rangers also paid off all football debts despite being accused of " accepting no responsibility " and were punished severely yet some people just won't let it go.

If it were Celtic most bears would leave them to it, like we did in the 90's, none of our business.

"These fans" aren't on a moral crusade, its nothing more than a witch hunt, settling percieved scores and trying to justify it all as sporting integrity.

Strings are being pulled by a handful of bloggers and a lot of people are lapping it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wee wisbit in his St mirren jammies getting told to keep it quiet from his mummy.

Seriously, who in their right kind and actually talks like that?

Overspending, aye maybe bit but was it against SPL rules? Were we the only team to have debts? Hearts Dundee utd, abersheep etc have all recently carried large debts (most now replaced with soft loans) yet Rangers were singled out due to an orchestrated campaign which gained momentum.

Ebt's are despite what you read not against the law and as LNS stated did not breach SPL rules. Yet we're apparently to be punished again because the vocal minority are screaming and shouting. Rangers also paid off all football debts despite being accused of " accepting no responsibility " and were punished severely yet some people just won't let it go.

If it were Celtic most bears would leave them to it, like we did in the 90's, none of our business.

"These fans" aren't on a moral crusade, its nothing more than a witch hunt, settling percieved scores and trying to justify it all as sporting integrity.

Strings are being pulled by a handful of bloggers and a lot of people are lapping it up.

Can we just clarify - EBTs are legal. Rangers not paying the correct Tax and NI was not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overspending, aye maybe bit but was it against SPL rules? Were we the only team to have debts? Hearts Dundee utd, abersheep etc have all recently carried large debts (most now replaced with soft loans) yet Rangers were singled out due to an orchestrated campaign which gained momentum.

Ebt's are despite what you read not against the law and as LNS stated did not breach SPL rules. Yet we're apparently to be punished again because the vocal minority are screaming and shouting. Rangers also paid off all football debts despite being accused of " accepting no responsibility " and were punished severely yet some people just won't let it go.

If it were Celtic most bears would leave them to it, like we did in the 90's, none of our business.

"These fans" aren't on a moral crusade, its nothing more than a witch hunt, settling percieved scores and trying to justify it all as sporting integrity.

Strings are being pulled by a handful of bloggers and a lot of people are lapping it up.

Overspent? "A bit".

Singled out.

LNS

Vocal minority screaming and shouting.

Paid off football debts? Everyone else, go fck yersel.

Punished severely.

If it were Celtic? Leave them to it. None of our business.

Witch hunt.

Bloggers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...