Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

RIFC also noted it passed a resolution “in accordance with section 506 of the Companies Act 2006 that the auditors name should not be stated” in the accounts.

Section 506 can be invoked if there are “reasonable grounds that statement of the name would create or be likely to create a serious risk that the auditor or senior statutory auditor, or any other person, would be subject to violence or intimidation, has resolved that the name should not be stated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. RIFC pass a resolution and note it in their accounts as Deloitte fear intimidation.

2. Leggat urges loonballs to contact them.

3. Delooitte quits citing intimidation and threats as the reason.

Sevconians: "It wisnae us"' :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. RIFC pass a resolution and note it in their accounts as Deloitte fear intimidation.

2. Leggat urges loonballs to contact them.

3. Delooitte quits citing intimidation and threats as the reason.

Sevconians: "It wisnae us"' :lol:

No, it was obviously Celtic fans upset that Deloitte's inserted the contingent liability and going concern warning into TRIFC's published accounts. Celtic fans want TRIFC to be able to raise capital for war chests and Deloitte's are clearly a hindrance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...