Ken Fitlike Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 Be fair, Bud - after the MBB, Charlie boy, Dignity Smith, Sally, The Taxi Boys, more Murrays than you could shake an EBT at, everybody's favourite P*ki friend, Jabba, Wee Chick, the Spence attacks, the BhBhC in general, and now the Fit and proper Fraudster, they have been keeping us entertained for a while now. And just look at what it's cost them to keep us chuckling - the only time I've known these lot be altruistic in any way. FFS, even "Frazier" got a bit thin on material towards the end. p.s. Even that dead hooker doesn't get the column inches anymore... 'hooker getting column inches' snigger 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 Be fair, Bud - after the MBB, Charlie boy, Dignity Smith, Sally, The Taxi Boys, more Murrays than you could shake an EBT at, everybody's favourite P*ki friend, Jabba, Wee Chick, the Spence attacks, the BhBhC in general, and now the Fit and proper Fraudster, they have been keeping us entertained for a while now. And just look at what it's cost them to keep us chuckling - the only time I've known these lot be altruistic in any way. FFS, even "Frazier" got a bit thin on material towards the end. p.s. Even that dead hooker doesn't get the column inches anymore... "a mint", surely. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 "a mint", surely. What kind of twisted freak goes shaking mints, for Goodness' sake? Honestly, JG - for shame! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 'hooker getting column inches' snigger Poor wee lassie stuffed, knickerless*, behind the photocopier, and you use her as an object of hilarity. Ken, I thought better of you. *Initially typed "knockerless", which takes us worryingly close to "Wire in the Blood" territory. Hope the typo wasn't freudian... -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 "a mint", surely. A Murray Mint? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 Poor wee lassie stuffed, knickerless*, behind the photocopier, and you use her as an object of hilarity. Ken, I thought better of you. *Initially typed "knockerless", which takes us worryingly close to "Wire in the Blood" territory. Hope the typo wasn't freudian... what did sigmund freud, founding father* of psychoanalysis have for breakfast? . . . . . freud eggs! fetching coat........ * a gallant pioneer,eh? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 I mean why make statements that he was been given the okay when it's blatantly not true .. :lol: That's an easy one, Silly. It's because King is "a glib and shameless liar". The dishonest swine had yet to be reunited with his luggage and he was already telling absolute whoppers. And these clowns see him as a saviour. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 Scott Fox getting a call up for the Scotland Squad and not Cammy Bell That'll be another added to the list Seems that he's proof of just how scummy Celtic can be.... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "SCOTT FOX can’t wait to play in the SPL after coming so close to stardom during his time at Celtic. The Partick Thistle keeper is within touching distance of the top flight again three years after leaving Parkhead. Fox, who was back-up to Artur Boruc on Champions League nights, never played a first-team game with Celtic and his time at the club ended on a sour note. When he knocked back a new deal, Celtic asked for £100,000 compensation from other clubs who wanted to sign him as Fox was still under 23. After spending six months without a club, the keeper was eventually forced to sign on at Queen of the South as an amateur...". -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skudbook Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 Hurting ... william tor10 David Cooper Templeton Loyal Bluenose 43 posts Gender:Male Location:lanarkshire Posted Today, 08:14 PM all ill say is a friend works for kpmg hes a auditor and with what hes been told on the qt gw is fucked and he nos it theres a lot more to this than meets the eye but do they we and the company dealin with the mess r as big as k p m g and they will find out every thing that went on. This ones getting his info from the shoe shine guy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 The fans who bought into Green's share issue are about to get shafted if the PLC goes into insolvency as the club may be sold and all they'll have left is shares in the holding company which will be ditched faster than a diseased rag in a gang bang. Who owns the actual shares in the club should the holding company go tits up possibly forfeiting the one for one share swap between the club and the holding company ???. Could Chucky offer a buy out for the club if the holding company heads into liquidation ?,remember the club itself is a separate entity from the holding company. Is the holding company just a front for the clubs impending debts to be ditched as soon as the club gets into financial trouble ?. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 The fans who bought into Green's share issue are about to get shafted if the PLC goes into insolvency as the club may be sold and all they'll have left is shares in the holding company which will be ditched faster than a diseased rag in a gang bang. Who owns the actual shares in the club should the holding company go tits up possibly forfeiting the one for one share swap between the club and the holding company ???. Could Chucky offer a buy out for the club if the holding company heads into liquidation ?,remember the club itself is a separate entity from the holding company. Is the holding company just a front for the clubs impending debts to be ditched as soon as the club gets into financial trouble ?. Now where did i leave that enigma machine again.... -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehoss Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 Now where did i leave that enigma machine again.... Shouldn't you be a little more worried because you and your fellow fans don't have a clue to the questions above not even to who owns the club. Lack of information was one of the big things for rangers fans during whytes stint, but you guys are clearly no further in the know now than at that time. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 Shouldn't you be a little more worried because you and your fellow fans don't have a clue to the questions above not even to who owns the club. Lack of information was one of the big things for rangers fans during whytes stint, but you guys are clearly no further in the know now than at that time. You understood the QC's post? You have to be taking the P here..... -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehoss Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 You understood the QC's post? You have to be taking the P here..... Which question you stuck on? He want to know who owns shares in rangers if the holding company does under? If it a front for some dodgy manoeuvrings should it go under and therefore everyone gets shafted? Can mr green come back on the scene and offer some of swap on a 1:1 ratio between company and club? Least I think that's what it is, although do need to replace the batteries in my enigma machine so I could be wrong! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehoss Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 Which question you stuck on? He want to know who owns shares in rangers if the holding company does under? If it a front for some dodgy manoeuvrings should it go under and therefore everyone gets shafted? Least I think that's what it is, although do need to replace the batteries in my enigma machine so I could be wrong! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehoss Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 You understood the QC's post? You have to be taking the P here..... He's a QC? Or is that just a playful term you give the lad? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehoss Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 To be fair it is an Internet forum! He could very well be one! Probably not but you never know. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehoss Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 Hey Tedi, What happened to your post! Now look like an ever bigger fool responding to nothing! Now I need to delete it as well. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thehoss Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 To be fair it is an Internet forum! He could very well be one! Probably not but you never know. This was in response to a geezer named Tedi taking about the QC lad being a special QC cause of his interest in rangers. I'm not a mentalist talking to myself in an Internet forum or anything. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache Don Posted November 4, 2013 Share Posted November 4, 2013 This was in response to a geezer named Tedi taking about the QC lad being a special QC cause of his interest in rangers. I'm not a mentalist talking to myself in an Internet forum or anything. Ah, it would appear you have had an encounter with the thread Polterfud, Tedi no longer posts, just spreads red and green dots around. There are occasional reports 'sightings' of him posting but little real evidence as these tend to be deleted instantly. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.