stonedsailor Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 They what the f**k are you moaning about then plastic. Breakdown imminent, his cognitive and motor functions are getting crossed, can't even type what he's thinking, the rage has gotten him. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 No and neither have you "Down Tools" at Ibrox? Heard a bit of worrying news today, might be blown out of proportion but I felt best to check on here to see if anyone else knew ‘owt. If I felt it was bull I wouldn’t have posted, heard it from an old lad who’s son was involved so no doubt something is up. Has anyone heard rumours of tradesmen working at Ibrox being asked to stop working as there is no cash to pay for work they have already done? Now we all have Tedi. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain kirk Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Breakdown imminent, his cognitive and motor functions are getting crossed, can't even type what he's thinking, the rage has gotten him.He's beginning to sound like a Dalek that's blown a fuse....Plastic plastic you plastic PLASTIC !!!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 RANGERS Football Club has released the folllowing statement in relation to costs for the recent SPL Commiission: "This matter has been dragged out long enough and we had thought Lord Nimmo Smith's verdict would have been an end to it. Attempting to stretch it out even further does nothing to help the image of a game torn by dissension and engulfed in turmoil. 'It is important to remember that Lord Nimmo Smith apportioned no blame against Rangers FC and thus no sanctions were imposed on this Club. It is inconceivable, therefore, as well as ridiculous that the SPL should even think about pursuing this Club for costs against what was widely regarded as an ill-conceived and unwise course of action by them in the first place." http://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/item/3667-club-statement Just when you think they don't get it, they don't get it even more. Rangers were found to be at fault were they not? The party at fault always pays the legal bills. The company running the club now should pay, simple. Lord Nimmo said so when he said there were penalties appliable to the club. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain kirk Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 RANGERS Football Club has released the folllowing statement in relation to costs for the recent SPL Commiission: "This matter has been dragged out long enough and we had thought Lord Nimmo Smith's verdict would have been an end to it. Attempting to stretch it out even further does nothing to help the image of a game torn by dissension and engulfed in turmoil. 'It is important to remember that Lord Nimmo Smith apportioned no blame against Rangers FC and thus no sanctions were imposed on this Club. It is inconceivable, therefore, as well as ridiculous that the SPL should even think about pursuing this Club for costs against what was widely regarded as an ill-conceived and unwise course of action by them in the first place."http://rangers.co.uk/news/headlines/item/3667-club-statement Just when you think they don't get it, they don't get it even more. Good ta know is back.. This is were Sevco make a total fud of themselves with their club seperate from company garbage,, "no blame agaisnt Rangers FC" the club weren't investigated it was the oldco who were found guilty in 11 cases, Now their telling us the club is being persued for money? Hmm surely they mean the newco? Or is the club and company the something again? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Guilty as sin mate. Using the old Newco/oldco defence again, Lord Nimmo Smith ruled that no sanctions were to be borne by Newco, but Chuckles is running around telling everybody that he owns the legal entity that is Rangers. All kicking off now... Peter A Smith @PeterAdamSmith 1m Neil Murray has left Rangers FC. More to follow... Guilty as sin mate. Using the old Newco/oldco defence again, Lord Nimmo Smith ruled that no sanctions were to be borne by Newco, but Chuckles is running around telling everybody that he owns the legal entity that is Rangers. All kicking off now... Peter A Smith @PeterAdamSmith 1m Neil Murray has left Rangers FC. More to follow... Damn there goes my PS3 session tonight, bear baiting it is then. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captain kirk Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Imagine "the legal entity rangers" being asked to pay legal bills after being found guilty. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Imagine "the legal entity rangers" being asked to pay legal bills after being found guilty. The "legal entity" thing is only the UEFA definition of a club, we take our direction from the SFA, who make the rules up on the hoof but they keep the record books up to date and need a strong Rangers to survive so we have to accept that the club are saints and can do nothing wrong. If only Chuckie turned up 2 decades ago, none of this would have happened. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Rangers were found to be at fault were they not? The party at fault always pays the legal bills. The company running the club now should pay, simple. Lord Nimmo said so when he said there were penalties appliable to the club. The booming SPL will just have to find another way to pay Celtics fat low level paper gatherer It isn't our bill 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 About the 3rd time in 10mins he's used plastic as abuse, the mask easily slips with his type though. Thats even better than your "piggery is sectarian" meltdown 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Yet you accepted the findings and celebrated them and paraded them as an end to it all , yet when it comes to paying its nothing to do with you it's the oldco? Oldco when it suits. The oldco pushed for the enquiry? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 (edited) I don't see why so many who are anti-Rangers are getting all wound up about the legal costs of the SPL Commission. The Commission already stated that the inquiry was about the operating of the club from the old company,The Rangers Football Club,Public Limited Company,nothing at all to do with the new company operating the club,The Rangers Football Club Limited. It's all there in the summation from the Commission and it seems that the SPL have shot themselves in the foot with this. So the way i read it is this; every club that is a member of the SPL,that will be the 12 that play in the SPL,is a shareholder of that league and may well have to pay up in equal terms to clear this cost. If that's the case then that's even more pleasing to add to the fact that our titles remain in the record books. Quite how the inhabitants at the piggery in the east end of Glasgow will feel about that i'm not quite sure,a bit annoyed perhaps. Edited April 2, 2013 by youngsy 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barrysnotter Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Rangers were guilty, The Rangers took Rangers assets, The Rangers should take Rangers liabilities. In short, The Rangers should cough up the legal fees. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Rangers were guilty, The Rangers took Rangers assets, The Rangers should take Rangers liabilities. In short, The Rangers should cough up the legal fees. In short The Rangers Football Club Limited should not pay the legal costs acquired by the SPL for a case they took out against a different company (The Rangers Football Club PLC) that owned and operated the club in the timeframe that the commission was looking at. Read the summation,you'll see that the Commission differentiated between both oldco and newco. Basically the SPL have made a complete cock up once again,which has enraged many who are anti-Rangers but it's made me laugh at many. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyWellFan Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 The Rangers should pay up and show some gratitude with a gesture towards the SPL. They are forgetting they wouldn't be kicking a ball this season if the footballing authorities in this country hadn't made an exception for them. I'm sure it won't make much of a dent in that £23 million they supposedly have. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 The Rangers should pay up and show some gratitude with a gesture towards the SPL. They are forgetting they wouldn't be kicking a ball this season if the footballing authorities in this country hadn't made an exception for them. I'm sure it won't make much of a dent in that £23 million they supposedly have. Aye very good. The SPL did the sum total of f**k all for Rangers,they instigated an investigation into the PLC, which had to be supported by it's member clubs as shareholders, to appease the cries from many to strip titles,they failed so tough on them,so now they may have to live with the financial consequences of their failed action. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyWellFan Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 (edited) So much hatred for the SPL. You can almost taste it. You weren't hard done by boys, no matter how much you think that was the case. Edited April 2, 2013 by MikeyWellFan 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Aye very good. The SPL did the sum total of f**k all for Rangers,they instigated an investigation into the PLC, which had to be supported by it's member clubs as shareholders, to appease the cries from many to strip titles,they failed so tough on them,so now they may have to live with the financial consequences of their failed action. What could or should have the SPL done to help the company in charge on Rangers at the time? Come on Youngsy, they had to carry out an investigation into the company. You know this. The only people who spoke about title stripping was Charlie Green, and rumours have it he was happy to give up the titles for a ticket right back into the SPL! Apparently it was McCoist that told him this would have been unacceptable 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youngsy Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 Lets face it this is pure desperation from the SPL, they have no money. Harper Macleod will be demanding to be paid regardless of Car Crash Rod`s complete misunderstanding of the rules. The SPL are 100% liable for these costs. it will be their name on the invoice. They were 100% sure that LNS would pin something on the newco, they were wrong. They now present the newco with an identical bill that they have no chance of getting paid and do not have the money to pay legal fees in order to take the newco to court. They have spent the oldco`s prize money along with the transfer fees they recieved that are due to the oldco, if not they would have just taken the money from this. They are as Charlie has already said trading while insolvent, no wonder the desperation for reconstruction. So much hatred for the SPL. You can almost taste it. You weren't hard done by boys, no matter how much you think that was the case. Answer this; who was the company that was fined? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted April 2, 2013 Share Posted April 2, 2013 They are as Charlie has already said trading while insolvent, no wonder the desperation for reconstruction. Proof of this? I wouldn't take Charlie Green word on it, after all it wouldn't be the first time he's came out with a statement and been proven wrong Unless you believe what he said in my sig 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.