Henrik's tongue Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 It's a matter of employing language for the purposes of accuracy - I describe as I find. Diddy clubbers - wtf are they like? There's another one for your wee collection - stick with it and you'll eventually be able to say that I've used the terms like pyoor mega times. As a bona-fide plastic, I'm feeling a bit left out now tbh 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 It's a matter of employing language for the purposes of accuracy - I describe as I find. Diddy clubbers - wtf are they like? There's another one for your wee collection - stick with it and you'll eventually be able to say that I've used the terms like pyoor mega times. What about some originality and variety? The point being that you are predictable and tedious. You'd be as well just saving the same post and pasting it into the reply box. Over and over again. I don't use terms like, "pyoor mega". I'm from the east coast. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 As a bona-fide plastic, I'm feeling a bit left out now tbh Aye, but there's something seriously wrong with you - you seem to both support them and go to their games. That's all kinds of fucked up by P&B standards. Weirdo. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 I don't use terms like, "pyoor mega". I'm from the east coast. Fur coat - nae knickers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Aye, but there's something seriously wrong with you - you seem to both support them and go to their games. That's all kinds of fucked up by P&B standards. Weirdo. I feel included again 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Agreed, ripping someone about cancer is stepping over the line, threats of violence are also out of order Aye. Any way, did you get my pressie ok today Ted? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS-18 ICBM Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Tick Tock Three Stooges, your time is short now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Fur coat - nae knickers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 You are won't dignify Ibrox chief executive Charles Green's statement with a response It is with huge disappointment that we read both the content and tone of the statement However, we do not intend to enter into a war of words with Rangers or to dignify their position by responding in kind Now you may agree with the statement, however you are not a football club chairman, it was only ever going to inflame things even further, which it did, they should have just said "We note rangers recent statement and will contact the SFA for further guidance" As I said both Men have not acted like professional football club chairmen and have allowed emotion to get in the way, for different reasons I think tomorrow I'll look out both the statements and post them in full. To compare the above (a selected paragraph) with what Green said, not forgetting that in terms of club v club officials, he instigated it is preposterous. You know, sometimes it really can be the case that one party acts like a fool without the whataboutery. I'm going to bed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymores Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 You can't be writing stuff like that, seriously. I'm a bit disappointed that you're getting away with it to be honest. Annoyed with myself TBH - but the p***k really has been awful 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Annoyed with myself TBH - but the p***k really has been awful You can still delete them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Hmm no Why? If you have 500 bucks to waste on shares you could easily buy me a nice gift ^^^^ They don't call us bheggars for nothing 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dindeleux Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 You deserve a ban for that. See you later. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 I am still waiting on the RST statement on the prospectus, they have some hot shot bluenose lawyer looking at it (not Paul Mcconville) and ok I got you one of these, just to remind you, if it quacks like a duck :lol: It'll sink 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymores Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 You deserve a ban for that. See you later. You deserve to get a go trying to justify yourself. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dindeleux Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 I don't even know what that means but you are well out of order here and hopefully won't be here tomorrow. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymores Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 I don't even know what that means but you are well out of order here and hopefully won't be here tomorrow. I mean yoiu are trying to cause trouble for no reason 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymores Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Look above and see why I legitimately complainaed of your abuse twice kid! -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 I am still waiting on the RST statement on the prospectus, they have some hot shot bluenose lawyer looking at it (not Paul Mcconville) and ok I got you one of these, just to remind you, if it quacks like a duck If it quacks like a duck, Tedi will think it's a duck, whether it's a rubber bath toy or a wooden hunting call. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingrodent Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Front page of the Record: 67 players are suing Rangers. Back page of the Record: We don't want to sue you - Rangers players who are still getting paid decry SPFA legal action. Page 48 of the Record: Charles Green's opinion on the matter, reported uncritically. Looks like this is going to be the line - "Rangers are facing a scurrilous attack by traitorous former players who are trying to take advantage of the club's predicament". Give it a week, and the SPFA will be a "biased" group that has an "agenda" "against Rangers", and all posts here by Rangers fans will look something like this.... "Independent" players union, eh? :lol: Charles Green will beat these turncoat sh*tebags in court 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.