Claymores Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 (edited) I really cannot fathom out what Bennett posted that can be taken so far out of context. Yup - he's a p***k. He's tried abuse on a lot at me in various disguises and "quips" - needs hit, end of story . Good smack in the face will stop his shoite to cancer patients Edited December 11, 2012 by Claymores 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Bennett has been provoking me for a while as he does to other people - I will not take his cancer shoite as I really had that and invite him to my clinic to punch his face Been there too Claymores (hence username, hell I even got 'repaired' in the Western after a botch job at Raigmore) , but if it is only that 1 post, I can't see it being offensive, unless there is 'history' I missed 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS-18 ICBM Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Yup - he's a p***k. He's tried abuse on a lot at me - needs hit, end of story He would probably pay you to do it too, he seems that strange sort that would be into that sort of thing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Fucking hell guys. This is not good shit. For what it's worth I don't think bennett would use such an issue to have a go. Honestly, I don't. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS-18 ICBM Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Certainly seems that way, even the ones named are denying it Seems strange for the PFA to raise action on behalf of players without consulting them 1st, one could say almost vendictive You'll mean "vindictive" i'm assuming... Like Rangers International Football club boycotting a Scottish Cup match because its via an SPL club that spoke the truth about what has been going on between them and the c***s at Ayebroke Stadium? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Certainly seems that way, even the ones named are denying it Seems strange for the PFA to raise action on behalf of players without consulting them 1st, one could say almost vendictive So we start at 67 and count backwards? Bit like the titles then 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Aye seemingly the PFA have raised a case on behalf of 67 Rangers players, except all the players are tweeting that they were not aware they are on that list and will be seeking to have their names removed http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2246191/Steven-Naismith-Steven-Whittaker-join-group-taking-legal-action-Rangers.html#ixzz2EhOSCd1M Naismith and Aluko have both said they were not involved Even Jiggy is on the list, you can guess what is response was Have no doubt that bint Grubbon will be involved The usual suspects are foaming at the mouth of course Any chance you could up your game a bit here? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Certainly seems that way, even the ones named are denying it Seems strange for the PFA to raise action on behalf of players without consulting them 1st, one could say almost vendictive It could also be that the PFA haven't. At least not on behalf of 67 players, maybe less than that. From what I understand the PFA haven't made any statement yet? To be fair though, it does seem that the numbers have been inflated (by the media's lazy journalism perhaps?). You have to wonder why it is in the prospectus. Is it just setting out a worse case scenario? We'll probably get a somewhat more accurate account of the true extent of the action over the coming days. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ray_of_licht Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Do we actually know for certain that PFA Scotland are doing this? Or is it based purely on the stuff from the prospectus? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS-18 ICBM Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Do we actually know for certain that PFA Scotland are doing this? Or is it based purely on the stuff from the prospectus? It doesn't really matter to us now as it has already gone global mainstream. Another world record for them, but this time it has been broadcast around the world. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Arsewipe to come up with such shit - I HOPE you get cancer soon Oh dear... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymores Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Certainly seems that way, even the ones named are denying it Seems strange for the PFA to raise action on behalf of players without consulting them 1st, one could say almost vendictive Tedsters back - how many players hate you?! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Easy...... : + lol + : = Or : + D = Thanks ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 I would not say Thomson broke the truth, that is simply a pile of pish I would however say that both Green and Thomson are behaving like children with the statements they released, no need for either, pointless sabre rattling If we are talking about the most recent statements, then the Dundee utd reply was very matter of fact IMO. I can't see that there was anything spiteful or insulting in it at all. Unless I'm missing something. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS-18 ICBM Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 If we are talking about the most recent statements, then the Dundee utd reply was very matter of fact IMO. I can't see that there was anything spiteful or insulting in it at all. Unless I'm missing something. Tedious is posting his usual ... pish. He is on full deflection mode. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bendarroch Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 I'm claiming another "plastic" and another "diddy". That's 2 of each in 3 posts since I predicted the main content of your posts. Such a limited vocabulary. It's a matter of employing language for the purposes of accuracy - I describe as I find. Diddy clubbers - wtf are they like? There's another one for your wee collection - stick with it and you'll eventually be able to say that I've used the terms like pyoor mega times. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 Oh dear... I know. I fucking hate this forum at times. Pish-rip, deflect, deny, debate by all means, but I hate when it gets vindictive like this. We're all just football fans at the end of the day. Well, we should be 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SS-18 ICBM Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 And I've not responded to Benny the Ball until tonight - he's a p***k who tries to abuse me and others for no reason - it would seriosly be karma if the p***k got cancer and died I can't see any reason ever why anyone would want to post that Claymore, seriously, especially twice. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 And I've not responded to Benny the Ball until tonight - he's a p***k who tries to abuse me and others for no reason - it would seriosly be karma if the p***k got cancer and died You can't be writing stuff like that, seriously. I'm a bit disappointed that you're getting away with it to be honest. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted December 11, 2012 Share Posted December 11, 2012 And I've not responded to Benny the Ball until tonight - he's a p***k who tries to abuse me and others for no reason - it would seriosly be karma if the p***k got cancer and died I'd cheer Och behave yourself ffs. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.