Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

Feel sorry for all bears who took time off work etc AGAIN especially guys we had travelling from from England and Inverness etc.

Over 2000 tickets sold in 4 days from all over Britain, We Truly Are The People.

This game WILL go ahead and hopefully I will have a date very soon.

The-art-of-trolling-500x500.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From a Sevco mate on Facebook...

"We are signing Kevin Kyle, Craig Beattie, Ian Black and Stevie Smith....soon".

No chance of them signing any of those players IMO.

Why ?

They simply wont need players of that calibre for the next two seasons and very probably cant afford any of them anyway, and certainly not all of them.

Might have happened if they got into Div1 just to be 100% certain of promotion, but signing players of that quality for Divs 3 & 2 is absolutely crazy IMO.

Edited by Only A Game !
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Feel sorry for all bears who took time off work etc AGAIN especially guys we had travelling from from England and Inverness etc.

Over 2000 tickets sold in 4 days from all over Britain, We Truly Are The People.

This game WILL go ahead and hopefully I will have a date very soon.

Er... Nope.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't The Rangers bought the club badge? They certainly still use it on the clubs website.

Surely the only thing wrong with the ticket is the 'The' in front of Rangers.

Although Green does want to give the impression he is the Oldco.

It's still a bit of a grey area the clubs copyrighted images.

It's been stated and posted on here from the HMRC's website on phoenix newco's setting up and trading under a liquidated companies name and copyrighted images.

The HMRC are adamant that no newco should NOT appear as the liquidated company in any way shape or form to trade as if they were a continuation of the old compnay.This means in name "Rangers" as Rangers are the oldco's trading name and is not geographical like Airdrie's circumstances.

So the next logical step is ! what will the HMRC do about Charles Green operating a new company under the guise of playing football under the old companies name and copyright images.It clearly contradicts what the HMRC consider to be a completely new company trading the same goods from the same location or place of residence of the dead company as the dead company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No chance of them signing any of those players IMO.

Why ?

They simply wont need players of that calibre for the next two seasons and very probably cant afford any of them anyway, and certainly not all of them.

Might have happened if they got into Div1 just to be 100% certain of promotion, but signing players of that quality for Divs 3 & 2 is absolutely crazy IMO.

True but they could be required to make up for Fat Sally's shite tactics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wondered this myself..

I've got to think we would have heard by now.

It seems there was no other applicant but that no applications were invited which is the way it worked when cally , county , Annan , Gretna etc where invited in. Kinda makes you think a deal before Fridays a cert since there's no alternative club out there to fulfil the fixtures for the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's still a bit of a grey area the clubs copyrighted images.

It's been stated and posted on here from the HMRC's website on phoenix newco's setting up and trading under a liquidated companies name and copyrighted images.

The HMRC are adamant that no newco should NOT appear as the liquidated company in any way shape or form to trade as if they were a continuation of the old compnay.This means in name "Rangers" as Rangers are the oldco's trading name and is not geographical like Airdrie's circumstances.

So the next logical step is ! what will the HMRC do about Charles Green operating a new company under the guise of playing football under the old companies name and copyright images.It clearly contradicts what the HMRC consider to be a completely new company trading the same goods from the same location or place of residence of the dead company as the dead company.

Does it take someone to file a 'fishul complaint to trigger some sort of action?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems there was no other applicant but that no applications were invited which is the way it worked when cally , county , Annan , Gretna etc where invited in. Kinda makes you think a deal before Fridays a cert since there's no alternative club out there to fulfil the fixtures for the season.

They could play the Third Division with nine teams, particularly if Sevco still think they have any sort of part in these discussions. Yet's that's you Fat Ally: your thoughts on the rightful stripping of titles from the corpse Rangers are irrelevant: sit down and stop whining. And of course, you're not even the manager of that club any more, you fucking tit.

Sevco employees. Honestly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's still a bit of a grey area the clubs copyrighted images.

It's been stated and posted on here from the HMRC's website on phoenix newco's setting up and trading under a liquidated companies name and copyrighted images.

The HMRC are adamant that no newco should NOT appear as the liquidated company in any way shape or form to trade as if they were a continuation of the old compnay.This means in name "Rangers" as Rangers are the oldco's trading name and is not geographical like Airdrie's circumstances.

So the next logical step is ! what will the HMRC do about Charles Green operating a new company under the guise of playing football under the old companies name and copyright images.It clearly contradicts what the HMRC consider to be a completely new company trading the same goods from the same location or place of residence of the dead company as the dead company.

FFS i'm getting sick of idiots repeating shite.

It's not a Phoenix company if none of the original directors are involved (not proven yet that they are still involved)

There is no mandatory 3 years of accounts needed - it's optional

12 quid a ticket is NOT the maximum that D3 teams can charge.

Sevco were not relegated

This isn't just at you Hellbhoy, i'm just being a grumpy old bar steward :P

Everyone, please feel free to add to the list of myths being perpetuated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...