Drew Brees Posted November 3, 2018 Share Posted November 3, 2018 They are spending £40k a day more than they earn and thats without adding in what gerrads train has cost them so far 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiddy Posted November 6, 2018 Share Posted November 6, 2018 Any estimates on "Third" Rangers? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killiekranky Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 20 hours ago, kiddy said: Any estimates on "Third" Rangers? They will be known as "These Rangers". 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 7, 2018 Share Posted November 7, 2018 Jings! The bralts on the go again, warp factor Sevco Mr Scott.... -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bohemian Posted November 11, 2018 Share Posted November 11, 2018 On 11/7/2018 at 17:36, bennett said: Jings! The bralts on the go again, warp factor Sevco Mr Scott.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 22 hours ago, Bohemian said: Bloody hell. Closest thing to a handsome 'Asiatic barbarian tribe member' I've ever seen. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
orfc Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 Dave loses another court case https://www.scotsman.com/news/rangers-owner-dave-king-fails-to-block-contempt-of-court-bid-1-4829878 Pay up for the other shares Dave 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 If only there was a celtic supporting QC who posted on here, the finest legal mind in the gallowgate they said.... -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelmen Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 Dave loses another court casehttps://www.scotsman.com/news/rangers-owner-dave-king-fails-to-block-contempt-of-court-bid-1-4829878 Pay up for the other shares DaveInteresting wee nugget in there, one I haven’t heard before The money for the shares purchased by the four men came from offshore trusts which were in the name of Mr King’s family. I thought the 3 bears had bought shares and paid with their own money? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dumpweed Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 What's th standard response from the rangers fans in regards to losing 38k a day. Surely nobody can remotely accept that as normal business practice 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonS Posted November 14, 2018 Share Posted November 14, 2018 2 hours ago, orfc said: Dave loses another court case https://www.scotsman.com/news/rangers-owner-dave-king-fails-to-block-contempt-of-court-bid-1-4829878 Pay up for the other shares Dave There are only two reasons why King would fight so hard to avoid the offer for the remaining shares. He doesn't have the cash, or he doesn't think the shares are worth anything like £11 million. Either way, it's extremely bad news for Rangers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 2 hours ago, GordonS said: There are only two reasons why King would fight so hard to avoid the offer for the remaining shares. He doesn't have the cash, or he doesn't think the shares are worth anything like £11 million. Either way, it's extremely bad news for Rangers. You're a right cheery b*****d, Gordon. Have you started wearing your Xmas jumper already? The implications for Rangers here are almost non-existent. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 9 hours ago, steelmen said: Interesting wee nugget in there, one I haven’t heard before I thought the 3 bears had bought shares and paid with their own money? It might explain why the Takeover Panel only went after King. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 8 hours ago, Snafu said: There was a site which revealed the clubs in the top leagues in the UK who are most dependent on their support forking out rather than living of merchandise/tv money/ sponsorship and guess who came out top. Until Rangers get their merchandise back from Ashley its going to be tough going and by the look of what's happening to that fat bag of p***k's finances that might not be too far off. I read that table as saying that Rangers didn't rely on other funding to pay their team's wage bill. They made enough from tickets and anything they got from TV , prize money and merchandise was disposable income. Other teams weren't so lucky. The only reason I'm defending this is because United came second. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
printer Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 There are only two reasons why King would fight so hard to avoid the offer for the remaining shares. He doesn't have the cash, or he doesn't think the shares are worth anything like £11 million. Your second reason could be right. Ranger's shares are worth nothing as an investment. I think the main reason, however, is simply he's an arrogant c*nt who has always done as he pleases and has no respect for the law. It's an ego thing. He's stringing this out in the hope (belief?) that it will go away. I think he is very much mistaken. As with the Sports Direct legal cases, none of this benefits Rangers - everything is just to suit King as an individual. Certainly re SD, his actions are harming Rangers financially - legal costs, executive time and, in particular, depressing the flow of cash from shirt etc sales into the club. ETA I'd be surprised in Rangers weren't footing the bill for the legal costs in the takeover panel court hearings. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonS Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 1 hour ago, printer said: I think the main reason, however, is simply he's an arrogant c*nt who has always done as he pleases and has no respect the law. It's an ego thing. Ah true, I often make the mistake of assuming people are rational actors. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florentine_Pogen Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 Any estimates on "Third" Rangers?.........SevcoDeux..........[emoji149][emoji149] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weirdcal Posted November 15, 2018 Share Posted November 15, 2018 You're a right cheery b*****d, Gordon. Have you started wearing your Xmas jumper already? The implications for Rangers here are almost non-existent.Wouldn't be too sure on that. It depends on funding position of NOAL that king has say over.If they don't have £11m for the offer (and offer completely taken up) and enough left after to cover the season shortfalls as mentioned in the accounts, then I think there could be issues down the line. But that's a fairly sizable if there 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boulderdomb Posted November 18, 2018 Share Posted November 18, 2018 If The Rangers die again, will they be allowed to re-join League 2 (again) or now that we have a pyramid be forced into either East of Scotland/South of Scotland leagues and work up from there into the Lowland etc? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelmen Posted November 18, 2018 Share Posted November 18, 2018 If The Rangers die again, will they be allowed to re-join League 2 (again) or now that we have a pyramid be forced into either East of Scotland/South of Scotland leagues and work up from there into the Lowland etc? Could be wrong but I think now the club / company are definitely separate they can punish the club with points deduction if the company is liquidated but another company can just take over the club.That’s what happened with Leeds was it not? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.