The_Kincardine Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 6 minutes ago, dave.j said: Catch you guys later. Im away to form The Third Lanark and claim their history. Wait Dave....you forgot this...' Ciao. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 2 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: Why have that arbitrary cut off? Is it because you know I'm right? It's not arbitrary. It represents the era after clubs had become incorporated. Since then club and company have been considered synonymous terms. Divorcing them is dishonest and in your case, entirely self serving. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wulliamwallace Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 Sevco fans are really deluded or just thick as f**k. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 Maybe he has a friend named Im who's off to form Third Lanark? It was good to let us know if that is the case. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 3 minutes ago, Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo said: Maybe he has a friend named Im who's off to form Third Lanark? Again...no more than 50%, young JJ. Good attempt at hauners but that would be Im's away, Shirley? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 7 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: It's not arbitrary. It represents the era after clubs had become incorporated. Right. Nothing at all arbitrary about that then. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 1 minute ago, The_Kincardine said: Right. Nothing at all arbitrary about that then. Indeed. It drew a line at a point relevant to the case under discussion. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 (edited) 9 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: Again...no more than 50%, young JJ. Good attempt at hauners but that would be Im's away, Shirley? I'll have to agree. Edited March 17, 2017 by Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 37 minutes ago, dave.j said: Catch you guys later. Im away to form The Third Lanark and claim their history. 54...53..52.... 1 and counting 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 13 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: Indeed. It drew a line at a point relevant to the case under discussion. So what's the implication if any club has changed its company registration number after you drew your arbitary line in the sand? Are they a new club? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 1 minute ago, The_Kincardine said: So what's the implication if any club has changed its company registration number after you drew your arbitary line in the sand? Are they a new club? I'd like to think so. Does that f**k over Celtic? So much the better. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 Just now, The DA said: I'd like to think so. Does that f**k over Celtic? So much the better. DUFC incorporated 1925...outside MT's line in the sand. I think that means you don't exist. Not that I'm a prophet... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 Just now, The_Kincardine said: DUFC incorporated 1925...outside MT's line in the sand. I think that means you don't exist. Not that I'm a prophet... Just wait a few weeks... Apparently. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 1 minute ago, The DA said: Just wait a few weeks... Apparently. Well we ken you've had more than one guise. No doubt you'll still be the same team. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 10 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: So what's the implication if any club has changed its company registration number after you drew your arbitary line in the sand? Are they a new club? I don't know. Did the existing organisation cease to be? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 8 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: I don't know. Did the existing organisation cease to be? If one adopts a new coy. reg. then I suspect one supersedes the previous yin. BTW I assume you don't recognise DUFC since club and company have 'been utterly divorced' within the last century. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 4 minutes ago, The_Kincardine said: If one adopts a new coy. reg. then I suspect one supersedes the previous yin. BTW I assume you don't recognise DUFC since club and company have 'been utterly divorced' within the last century. Have they? I thought you said they were incorporated in 1925? My own club was only founded in 1919, so I don't know where you're trying to head with this 'logic'? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 Just now, Monkey Tennis said: Have they? I thought you said they were incorporated in 1925? My own club was only founded in 1919, so I don't know where you're trying to head with this 'logic'? 1925 ante-dates me. Probably Kinky, too. United didn't do much before '25 and I wasn't around to see it anyway. What is this thing Rangers fans have about history going back 100 years or more? Does it give their own lives some kind of validity? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 2 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said: Have they? I thought you said they were incorporated in 1925? My own club was only founded in 1919, so I don't know where you're trying to head with this 'logic'? Your logic was that Club and company have always been considered synonymous in a football sense within the last C. Clearly they haven't unless you want to write off both DUFC and QOTS. Care to revise your statement? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted March 17, 2017 Share Posted March 17, 2017 3 minutes ago, The DA said: What is this thing Rangers fans have about history going back 100 years or more? That was MT's line in the sand. Before the past 100 years it's ok for club and company to be separate. Not since then, apparently. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.