bennett Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 "Phoenix Suns Crisis: Owner Robert Sarver Should Be Blamed" "The Phoenix Suns have devolved from a possible playoff contender to arguably the worst team in the NBA. When you lose to a team that's trying to lose, you definitely have a problem in your hands. This is more evident when your team owner blames an entire generation for your problems." "Firing Jeff Hornacek seems to be the obvious move but will it solve the team's problems? Sarver's impatience and his trades that were allegedly done to cut corners are more to blame than Hornacek, who had to play with the cards he is dealt 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 "Phoenix Suns Crisis: Owner Robert Sarver Should Be Blamed" "The Phoenix Suns have devolved from a possible playoff contender to arguably the worst team in the NBA. When you lose to a team that's trying to lose, you definitely have a problem in your hands. This is more evident when your team owner blames an entire generation for your problems." "Firing Jeff Hornacek seems to be the obvious move but will it solve the team's problems? Sarver's impatience and his trades that were allegedly done to cut corners are more to blame than Hornacek, who had to play with the cards he is dealt We Deserve Better? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 rangers fans caught between a rock & a hard place with this latest update on the Sir Charles saga. Absolutely not. If they are guilty they will be convicted and if they are innocent they will go free. There is no implication for Rangers here whatsoever. The only story here with any sort of edge is the anti-Semitic malodorous ones paying a guy to go to court and tweet about it. I know that the Ps&Ds will gloss over this yin but for we normal people it's the apotheosis of bizarre. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Absolutely not. If they are guilty they will be convicted and if they are innocent they will go free. There is no implication for Rangers here whatsoever. The only story here with any sort of edge is the anti-Semitic malodorous ones paying a guy to go to court and tweet about it. I know that the Ps&Ds will gloss over this yin but for we normal people it's the apotheosis of bizarre. Correct they're deid. Perhaps if the valuation of Ibrox + Edminston Hooose + Car park at £1.5m is found to be a little light, will that not have implications for TRFIC? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Correct they're deid. Perhaps if the valuation of Ibrox + Edminston Hooose + Car park at £1.5m is found to be a little light, will that not have implications for TRFIC? No. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Absolutely not. If they are guilty they will be convicted and if they are innocent they will go free. There is no implication for Rangers here whatsoever. The only story here with any sort of edge is the anti-Semitic malodorous ones paying a guy to go to court and tweet about it. I know that the Ps&Ds will gloss over this yin but for we normal people it's the apotheosis of bizarre. So, no consequences of either Green or Whyte being found guilty, for the company who currently own the assets? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Interesting and loquacious as always. How's the view from the bucket of sand your head is stuck in? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 I'd be careful Kinky, you know what your fellow bears are like, they'll be hailing you as some sort of law expert. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 I'd be careful Kinky, you know what your fellow bears are like, they'll be hailing you as some sort of law expert. L.A.-T_KQC-Ironside-At-Law-McBeal? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Said from day one that I did not trust this Sarver bid, delaying tactic? used to sound out opinion of fans to a new messiah? if he genuinely wanted to buy Rangers then you think he would have at least tried to foster a deal with one of the groups that the fans actually trust. The vast majority of Rangers fans are glad Sarver did not see his bid given any serious consideration, they saw him as a plant or a diversion, so not sure where you are getting this from? RM? if so then FF is a much truer representation of how fans feel, it has far more members and a 16 page thread rejecting Sarver. ETA, there is actually around 11 threads on FF all negative in comment, there was also a poll with only 12% wanting him to succeed....the fans do not want action. Said from day one that I did not trust this Sarver bid, delaying tactic? used to sound out opinion of fans to a new messiah? if he genuinely wanted to buy Rangers then you think he would have at least tried to foster a deal with one of the groups that the fans actually trust.Hahahaha TEDI believed his racist mouthpiece hero again -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 So, no consequences of either Green or Whyte being found guilty, for the company who currently own the assets? This fraud trial won't affect the ownership of Rangers in any way, whatever the outcome and however much people use the 'if you bought a stolen car' analogy. Interesting and loquacious as always. How's the view from the bucket of sand your head is stuck in? You are, of course, glossing over the 'paying a bloke to tweet' human interest story. Given that your online life is Rangers-based perhaps you're a contributor. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 I never listen to any YIN fans, stop lying. If only you and other gullible idiots hadn't listened to DKs racist mouthpiece about Sarver. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 This all day long, quite funny watching the Ps and Ds salivating in this, their latest great hope for doom and gloom down ibrox way. You do have to admire their indefatigably however misplaced it is. I can't imagine what it's like to be a yin and show this commitment to another team. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Sarver, it is understood, will pay off 38 million euros of debt at some point, while he is also prepared to inject significant amounts of investment if and when the team is promoted to La Liga. Hahaha oh ma fuckin sides 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 racist Racist racist Remind me of what you got banned for. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Remind me of what you got banned for. Confusing me with TEDI and No8. Again. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Union of Fans spokesman Chris Graham said: “The Sarver offer was always a bit of a sideshow as it was never really a viable offer. Now that it has been withdrawn we can now start looking at the real business, which is where are they going to get the short-term funding from. Hahaha 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thistle_do_nicely Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Bill Miller, in all likelihood, would have been the best option and not burned through £millions in achieving absofuckinglutely nothing. Mercifully he got chased away from taking over. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim999 Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Sarver aside, anyone out there from a fairly neutral persuasion have any rough idea of the implications to rangers/sevco (if any) should White or Green do get found guilty on any fraud charges here? Some of a Rangers persuasion reckon only the accused personally would be penalised whilst others think otherwise. I appreciate there may not be a lot of lawyers out there guys and girls but the thread is a bit tit for tat just now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiddy Posted January 5, 2016 Share Posted January 5, 2016 Has anyone mentioned Bill Ng recently? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.