Jump to content
qos_75

The Queen of the South Thread

Recommended Posts

Point 1 Agreeing to and actually signing are two different things in my book

Point 2 How can the Club official site claim he signed on the 1st if in fact he did not.

Point 3 It is an internet forum, am I not like everyone else allowed to comment on what I see as relevant issues.

Point 4 At least my post has not been moderated or suggested it is a personal attack, so progress there.

And finally am I "just looking for something to have a go about" certainly not, just looking for the Club to be proffesional in their activities, well as best they can and that way avoid any unnecessary ambiguity. Do I sense you may have issues with me ?

Point 1 - semantics. That was just my wording in trying to explain what I know of the situation

Point 2 - Because he did

Point 3 - You can comment on what you like. Similarly, if I think you're just trying to stir things up for the sake of it, then Im just as entitled to say so

Point 4 - no idea what youre on about

And your finally, as I said, you have absolutely no proof that the club hasnt been proffesional (sic) in their activities, other than your obvious desire that this is the case.

I have no issue with you, why woud I? I have no idea who you are. Your "Point 4" would suggest its the other way round

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately , Qos Mad has went downhill a bit recently. Some good contributors either banned, took the huff or dissapeared. Replaced by some not as interesting

Ach, I don't know. It's maybe just me but if it's the poster I'm thinking of there's something slightly car crashy that keeps me going back for a look.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Adamski, I wasn't meaning any one person in particular. More a comment about the way the site is going as a whole . Who are you referring to ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Adamski, I wasn't meaning any one person in particular. More a comment about the way the site is going as a whole . Who are you referring to ?

Think he was talking aboot "veteran" and the wee boy he gees a lift tae frae East Kilbride.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

does anyone think we could get paton on loan?

bit random i know.

Firmly in Iron's plans at stenny. Would take a fee to shift him I would think. Now playing a centre midfield role. Assuming you were thinking rb for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No posts anywhere regarding today's Cup win, it just shows the apathy towards cup football these days. To make matters look even worse, Queens got the biggest crowd out of all the games and most of them got in fur free. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice work embedding the podcasts Mr X, much better.

No problem :)

One of the improvements to the site I've actually manged to get round to finishing :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

someone commenting that not much talk of game yesterday, We did alright at times a thought we looked good then five minutes later we'd look very vulnerable in defence. Both goals were very decent and taking well, we also had a few more chances, which is promising. There goal was a brilliant finish, couldn't believe some nutter beside me in terracing trying to blame McKenzie (who again did nothing wrong), Mark Campbell oozes class at centre half, Simmons keeps ball and sprays it about very well, McLaughlan is very similar but not scared to get his foot in and upfront Smith looked decent but sometimes just needs to let ball go a wee bit earlier, wee Dan was very good again... has to be one of first names on team sheet!

Like gus says on os, its brand new team, going to take time for it all to work, and he's not papering over cracks he knows theres room for improvement hopefully we can get it. Livingston next week is looking like a very difficult test, they've had some high scoring wins and a great preseason

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

someone commenting that not much talk of game yesterday, We did alright at times a thought we looked good then five minutes later we'd look very vulnerable in defence. Both goals were very decent and taking well, we also had a few more chances, which is promising. There goal was a brilliant finish, couldn't believe some nutter beside me in terracing trying to blame McKenzie (who again did nothing wrong), Mark Campbell oozes class at centre half, Simmons keeps ball and sprays it about very well, McLaughlan is very similar but not scared to get his foot in and upfront Smith looked decent but sometimes just needs to let ball go a wee bit earlier, wee Dan was very good again... has to be one of first names on team sheet!

Like gus says on os, its brand new team, going to take time for it all to work, and he's not papering over cracks he knows theres room for improvement hopefully we can get it. Livingston next week is looking like a very difficult test, they've had some high scoring wins and a great preseason

could of been me actually, but i was actually on the wind up to one of my mates who rates him ( i dont ) but i accept he wasnt at fault.

on the performance yesterday there are signs that once this side gels we could be pretty decent. was impressed with simmons and big campbell and brighton when he played up front ( hes never been a winger) smith looked pretty useful as well and higgins didnt look comfortable at left back. queens looked pretty good when they went to a 4-3-3 later on in the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's Queen's fans opinions on David Weatherston? According to a local paper he's training with us, and we might be looking to take him on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's Queen's fans opinions on David Weatherston? According to a local paper he's training with us, and we might be looking to take him on.

He split opinion amongst our support. I`d have kept him and the story was that he had been offered a deal but MacPherson subsequently withdrew this. That could be rubbish mind you.

Lightening fast but sometimes lacked end product. Can play wide or up front. Decent enough goal return given limited starts in my view.

Too posh and too educated for Brannigan`s liking allegedly ;)

Edited by Distant Doonhamer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's Queen's fans opinions on David Weatherston? According to a local paper he's training with us, and we might be looking to take him on.

I thought he was decent and would have kept him.

Dreading him playing against us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would be a good signing for Falkirk.Gus has made a huge mistake not resigning him :angry: has the money for 1 more signing but .for some reason he does not rate Weatherston.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pacy, but lacking in an end product and a football brain. Has a tendency to take the huff, and struggles to complete 90 mins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...