Jump to content

The Falkirk FC Thread


Recommended Posts

Guest Brockvillenomore
14 minutes ago, LatapyBairn. said:

A token fan rep on a board is completely different from the actual fan ownership structure we have now! Jesus wept! 🤦‍♀️ We must now be one of the most democratically run clubs in the country FFS!

Didn’t at least one fan rep resign because he was sidelined and excluded from all the major decisions? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not wanting to get involved in the above which just seems to be a back and forth nonsense, but what I will say is there has got to be an end to the creeping narrative that FSS is failing.

Sole focus seems to be on how much money FSS is bringing in. I understand why, the 'black hole' in the budget brings stresses and FSS was seen as a potential fix, but ultimately filling a gap in the budget is not why we want fan ownership.

I am on my knees begging that by the end of the season we are looking at promotion and a cup semi. For the obvious reason first, but also I think it just gives the club and FSS that breathing space to allow a gradual build to the ownership model which secures our future.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bairney The Dinosaur said:

Not wanting to get involved in the above which just seems to be a back and forth nonsense, but what I will say is there has got to be an end to the creeping narrative that FSS is failing.

Sole focus seems to be on how much money FSS is bringing in. I understand why, the 'black hole' in the budget brings stresses and FSS was seen as a potential fix, but ultimately filling a gap in the budget is not why we want fan ownership.

I am on my knees begging that by the end of the season we are looking at promotion and a cup semi. For the obvious reason first, but also I think it just gives the club and FSS that breathing space to allow a gradual build to the ownership model which secures our future.

 

I have not seen anywhere that the FSS is failing. My view is that it is a bit of a victim of circumstances. To be bringing in 100k per season from nothing is a great effort. Unfortunately it is not enough in the current situation. The club therefore has to look at other options. I agree beating Ayr buys everyone time 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Brockvillenomore
10 minutes ago, Back Post Misses said:

I have not seen anywhere that the FSS is failing. My view is that it is a bit of a victim of circumstances. To be bringing in 100k per season from nothing is a great effort. Unfortunately it is not enough in the current situation. The club therefore has to look at other options. I agree beating Ayr buys everyone time 

I agree. There is no narrative about the FSS failing. Nor was there a suggestion at the AGM. There was a realism that to match the management teams ambition and support them additional funding was needed to get out of league one and mount a decent challenge in the championship. 

After losing what looks like £1.6M in two years time is running out to make fan ownership work. In my opinion. 
 

Edited by Brockvillenomore
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Back Post Misses said:

The club needs finance to fill the hole we all know about. There are more than 1800 people who are ST holders who have not joined FSS. Why? Various reasons we all speculate about. So how does the club try to tap into that group of fans? You can’t blame the Board for trying to look at all options surely? 

You last paragraph is utter shite. FSS have as much say in this club as Patrons and as all the Board are FSS members i just can’t see WTF you are talking about. 

If you are insinuating the Patron group has influence over policy at the club I can tell you 100% not one decision made by the club since December 2021 have I or any other non Board members who are Patrons had input into, and nor do I want any. If I think the Patron reps are doing a poor job I will then vote the reps off. 

I don’t disagree but launching a competing scheme and whacking up ticket prices seems a strange way of increasing FSS numbers. The latter has the potential to decrease membership depending on the scale of the increases.

In my view you need to look at how to make the FSS more attractive rather than directing more of people’s money elsewhere. The price draws are a great initiative- we should be looking to build on these. The political objections to a share save scheme also need to go imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, PedroMoutinho said:

I don’t disagree but launching a competing scheme and whacking up ticket prices seems a strange way of increasing FSS numbers. The latter has the potential to decrease membership depending on the scale of the increases.

In my view you need to look at how to make the FSS more attractive rather than directing more of people’s money elsewhere. The price draws are a great initiative- we should be looking to build on these. The political objections to a share save scheme also need to go imo.

In my opinion (and I’m sure others) the FSS becomes less attractive to me as a fan if it isn’t unionised, the whole point is strength in numbers and we vote as a block on a decision taken democratically by all members. If a fan wants to go buy individual shares in they’re own name nothing is stopping them from doing so, in fact I asked this question and the club actually already offers a “share save” scheme of sorts if somebody wanted to buy some shares but pay them up over an agreed period of time they can do so. 

Edited by LatapyBairn.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, PedroMoutinho said:

I don’t disagree but launching a competing scheme and whacking up ticket prices seems a strange way of increasing FSS numbers. The latter has the potential to decrease membership depending on the scale of the increases.

In my view you need to look at how to make the FSS more attractive rather than directing more of people’s money elsewhere. The price draws are a great initiative- we should be looking to build on these. The political objections to a share save scheme also need to go imo.

I think you are right in terms of making the FSS more attractive but that is the guys who run its role supportered by the club, not the other way round 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Back Post Misses said:

I have not seen anywhere that the FSS is failing. My view is that it is a bit of a victim of circumstances. To be bringing in 100k per season from nothing is a great effort. Unfortunately it is not enough in the current situation.

 

39 minutes ago, Brockvillenomore said:

I agree. There is no narrative about the FSS failing. Nor was there a suggestion at the AGM.

Not a dominant narrative but have started to feel it creeping in. It's usually when, as BPM you've mentioned above, the money generated not being enough. I just don't feel like it the role of FSS to fill the budget gap, but therefore understand why other income streams are needed like ticket price increases and 'Falkirk Forever' (although I'm not convinced the latter doesn't step on toes the of FSS).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PedroMoutinho said:

Not advocating them fighting each other. However, patently the interests of people who’ve ponied up £10k minimum will not always be the same as people contributing a tenner a month.

It appears you think a fan paying less will have different interests than a fan who pays more.

I would have thought both would have only one interest, which is for Falkirk FC to be successful. How much they contribute to that is irrelevant. Everyone pays what they can afford. 

Neither are going to get any any dividend from what they put in so why would they have different interests? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Brockvillenomore
22 minutes ago, Bairney The Dinosaur said:

 

Not a dominant narrative but have started to feel it creeping in. It's usually when, as BPM you've mentioned above, the money generated not being enough. I just don't feel like it the role of FSS to fill the budget gap, but therefore understand why other income streams are needed like ticket price increases and 'Falkirk Forever' (although I'm not convinced the latter doesn't step on toes the of FSS).

There doesn’t need to be a budget gap. The BoD can lower expectations and let the management team build a team on a smaller budget. 

Their declared objective is to be back in the Premiership by our 150th anniversary.  
Perhaps this is where the potential disconnect is? 


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Diamonds are Forever said:

The overall quality of Falkirk TV is superb, probably the best in the lower leagues.

Got to say though the commentator always comes across as ridiculous. He resembles how I watched football when I was 12 years old, seems to think everything is against his team and complains about it during the commentatory. In a 9 minute highlights package he whines about Airdrie's goal being offside on 3 separate occasions, despite it being almost impossible to tell from the replay.

Absolutely no issue with club commentators being biased, as ours is, but there's a way of doing it. It's the only unprofessional part of an otherwise excellent service. Although I appreciate 95% of viewers aren't really going to care!

I have to agree regarding the commentators. I applaud the work they do, but it does frustrate me a wee bit. I tuned into WaspsTV a few weeks ago for the rescheduled game, and their commentary team were great. Seemed insightful and weren’t overly biased 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let’s be realistic and and sensible. The FSS has done remarkably well in a relatively short period. The club are absolutely correct & within their rights to explore every single possible source of revenue, as we as supporters would expect, however that statement was so bloody wrong. Roll on the recent AGM and good news that the hole in finances is pretty much filled but with a lot of hard work to do. 
My fear and sure it’s a worry with many supporters that we won’t get FSS numbers anywhere near expectations of the FSS/club. If we’re relying on a new supporters funding ie. Falkirk Forever for the shortfall, have considerable worries this isn’t the answer. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PedroMoutinho said:

I don’t disagree but launching a competing scheme and whacking up ticket prices seems a strange way of increasing FSS numbers. The latter has the potential to decrease membership depending on the scale of the increases.

In my view you need to look at how to make the FSS more attractive rather than directing more of people’s money elsewhere. The price draws are a great initiative- we should be looking to build on these. The political objections to a share save scheme also need to go imo.

I think by launching a scheme to put a tenner a month and get nothing for it, makes the FSS option far more attractive 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Bainsfordbairn said:

It appears you think a fan paying less will have different interests than a fan who pays more.

I would have thought both would have only one interest, which is for Falkirk FC to be successful. How much they contribute to that is irrelevant. Everyone pays what they can afford. 

Neither are going to get any any dividend from what they put in so why would they have different interests? 

 

It’s too simplistic a view. Yes, there is a common aim, but remember, there are two Board members appointed by the Patrons, and I guess they are accountable to the Patrons group just as the two FSS Board members will have some degree of accountability to the FSS subscribers.

That one group or the other might have differing views on how certain things can be achieved is a perfectly normal piece of business I would have thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Brockvillenomore

As it stands, we have progressed some way from the depths of where we were at the end of last season. Squad ✅ manager ✅ potential for promotion ✅ and a shot at a Scottish Cup Semi Final. ✅

Our choice is simple. We have the opportunity to become a club, fully owned by our community and a support ideally in their thousands,  putting in what they can to push for 2 promotions and ultimately make us competitive and established in the premiership  

Or, we live within our means .

Or, find another model / approach  

We’re lucky to have the choice after the last few years and all credit to everybody who has played their part in giving us this chance  


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Duncan Freemason said:

It’s too simplistic a view. Yes, there is a common aim, but remember, there are two Board members appointed by the Patrons, and I guess they are accountable to the Patrons group just as the two FSS Board members will have some degree of accountability to the FSS subscribers.

That one group or the other might have differing views on how certain things can be achieved is a perfectly normal piece of business I would have thought.

Football isn’t like most other businesses. My only wish is to see my club do well on the pitch, be properly run and it is still there for future generations. I don’t see many fans, if any that have a view that is different. Because of that I don’t think agendas are any different no matter the cash injection 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Brockvillenomore said:

As it stands, we have progressed some way from the depths of where we were at the end of last season. Squad ✅ manager ✅ potential for promotion ✅ and a shot at a Scottish Cup Semi Final. ✅

Our choice is simple. We have the opportunity to become a club, fully owned by our community and a support ideally in their thousands,  putting in what they can to push for 2 promotions and ultimately make us competitive and established in the premiership  

Or, we live within our means .

Or, find another model / approach  

We’re lucky to have the choice after the last few years and all credit to everybody who has played their part in giving us this chance  


 

 

With all due respect, and without stating the obvious, what is “living within our means” for Falkirk Football Club ? No sarcastic comments please….. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Brockvillenomore
2 minutes ago, Springfield said:

With all due respect, and without stating the obvious, what is “living within our means” for Falkirk Football Club ? No sarcastic comments please….. 

If you can’t state the obvious I’m not sure I can. Maybe what accountants consider to be a going concern is the best answer. 
 

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/goingconcern.asp

 

A bit out of my comfort zone this tbh. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Springfield said:

With all due respect, and without stating the obvious, what is “living within our means” for Falkirk Football Club ? No sarcastic comments please….. 

crudely speaking while in this division I’d presume it means cutting most of that 400k from the playing budget as this was the initial predicted over spend for the current year. We were told at the AGM the club is basically running on a skeleton staff and depends a lot on its volunteers so there is no more fat left to trim elsewhere. Presuming the average wage (and I’m guessing here) for one of or players is 25 or 30k a year then you can do the math yourself on how badly loosing 400k from the current playing budget would effect us on the park which in turn indirectly effects every other revenue stream the club has. 

Edited by LatapyBairn.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...