Shadwell Dog Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 Just now, Back Post Misses said: I was at the EGM, you were not. It was clear what he said and how it was meant at the time. I was at the egm too mate. And was very clear to me what he said. I'm no fan of the msg but in this case he certainly wasnt meaning that they would be the msg from now to the end of time. That's just not the case. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshmallo Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 56 minutes ago, Shadwell Dog said: Yes they are still going to be watching the bairns home or away whether they are majority share holders or not. He made that clear that was what he meant when I asked him a couple of weeks ago. He's seen the reaction to what he said and shat it then. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 I was at the egm too mate. And was very clear to me what he said. I'm no fan of the msg but in this case he certainly wasnt meaning that they would be the msg from now to the end of time. That's just not the case.Not sure how you can interpret your way tbh, without his future backtrack. We can all do that, doesnt change what he said when under the cosh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grangemouth Bairn Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 26 minutes ago, Back Post Misses said: I was at the EGM, you were not. It was clear what he said and how it was meant at the time. I thought Shodwell was at the EGM ?? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadwell Dog Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 (edited) 16 minutes ago, Bairnardo said: 32 minutes ago, Shadwell Dog said: I was at the egm too mate. And was very clear to me what he said. I'm no fan of the msg but in this case he certainly wasnt meaning that they would be the msg from now to the end of time. That's just not the case. Not sure how you can interpret your way tbh, without his future backtrack. We can all do that, doesnt change what he said when under the cosh. It was clear to me at the time what he meant. Ffs do people really think that these guys actually feel that they will be the majority shareholders from now to their dieing day? He was stating that majority share holder or not they would be attending games home and away and therefore going nowhere. If a fan wins the euromillions and offers them decent cash for the club their going to say no we're going nowhere? Eh naw. As I said I'm certainly no fan of the msg but we're making things up to fit agendas on here I'm afraid. Edited October 20, 2019 by Shadwell Dog 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stainrod Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 Thats the only thing that would make sense, that having started a process you are legally dutybound to see it through. Meantime we are powerless watching an absolute shambles. It’s all but over SA is not going to capitulate and give him the south stand . Without that deal secured his backers will renage on providing the funding. I’ve heard from a very reliable source we are now getting our ducks in a row to defend against any action from him for costs . All pretty messy but I’m certain he park and the football agency MC recently set up were up to no good so we are better safe than sorry. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 11 minutes ago, Shadwell Dog said: It was clear to me at the time what he meant. Ffs do people really think that these guys actually feel that they will be the majority shareholders from now to their dieing day? He was stating that majority share holder or not they would be attending games home and away and therefore going nowhere. If a fan wins the euromillions and offers them decent cash for the club their going to say no we're going nowhere? Eh naw. As I said I'm certainly no fan of the msg but we're making things up to fit agendas on here I'm afraid. Doesnt make any sense in that context though. Why would any boycotters care if SA continues to attend games? His comment only makes sense in the context of "i'm not selling" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roman_bairn Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 MC's mask is slipping.Did you nick that from Marillion’s Script for a Jesters Tear? .... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadwell Dog Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 26 minutes ago, Bairnardo said: Doesnt make any sense in that context though. Why would any boycotters care if SA continues to attend games? His comment only makes sense in the context of "i'm not selling" He was basically saying if people are boycotting till I'm away then they will have a long boycott as I'll always be here supporting the club. We're trying to make something out of nothing here. I can tell you if I had thought he meant what you are implying I wouldvr given him it tight right there and then. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadwell Dog Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 (edited) 14 minutes ago, roman_bairn said: Did you nick that from Marillion’s Script for a Jesters Tear? .... Dont think its script. Was that not a single cover? Market square heroes perhaps? Edited October 20, 2019 by Shadwell Dog 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grangemouth Bairn Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 15 minutes ago, roman_bairn said: Did you nick that from Marillion’s Script for a Jesters Tear? .... It’s the cover from Market Square Heroe’s mate. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roman_bairn Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 Dont think its script. Was that not a single cover? Market square heroes perhaps?Indeed it is. Do we have a plethora of Marillion fans in the Falkirk FC community? Rather listen to that stuff at games than bloody Amarillo?[emoji53] 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadwell Dog Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 1 minute ago, roman_bairn said: Indeed it is. Do we have a plethora of Marillion fans in the Falkirk FC community? Rather listen to that stuff at games than bloody Amarillo? Fish stuff very much so. Not a big fan of the steve hogarth pish. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roman_bairn Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 Fish stuff very much so. Not a big fan of the steve hogarth pish.Ach mate..you don’t know what you’re missing.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshmallo Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 18 minutes ago, Shadwell Dog said: He was basically saying if people are boycotting till I'm away then they will have a long boycott as I'll always be here supporting the club. We're trying to make something out of nothing here. I can tell you if I had thought he meant what you are implying I wouldvr given him it tight right there and then. He's not an idiot, he knows people aren't boycotting him being in the stand, they are boycotting the ownership and running of the club. You're either a fluffer for him or you're being incredibly naive. I've said a couple of times now that I think the board are just waiting on a decent run if results to announce no takeover to try and minimise any backlash against them. The fans need to turn the pressure back up as soon as Walter's bid is booted into touch. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
60`s bairn Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 15 minutes ago, Shadwell Dog said: He was basically saying if people are boycotting till I'm away then they will have a long boycott as I'll always be here supporting the club. We're trying to make something out of nothing here. I can tell you if I had thought he meant what you are implying I wouldvr given him it tight right there and then. I`m somewhere in the middle. Definitely sounded to me as though he was saying the MSG are going nowhere but it was said in anger, a bit of a "red mist" moment. Similar to Boris Johnson saying he would "rather die in a ditch than send a letter to Brussels". Just a bit of bravado. It may well end up being the case though the way this bid is going. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadwell Dog Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 (edited) 11 minutes ago, 60`s bairn said: I`m somewhere in the middle. Definitely sounded to me as though he was saying the MSG are going nowhere but it was said in anger, a bit of a "red mist" moment. Similar to Boris Johnson saying he would "rather die in a ditch than send a letter to Brussels". Just a bit of bravado. It may well end up being the case though the way this bid is going. Does anyone have a recording of the meeting or a word by word notes? 12 minutes ago, Marshmallo said: He's not an idiot, he knows people aren't boycotting him being in the stand, they are boycotting the ownership and running of the club. You're either a fluffer for him or you're being incredibly naive. I've said a couple of times now that I think the board are just waiting on a decent run if results to announce no takeover to try and minimise any backlash against them. The fans need to turn the pressure back up as soon as Walter's bid is booted into touch. I'm certainly no fluffer mate I can assure you of that. As I said if I had taken it as that I wouldve said. I certainly did enough criticising of them at the egm otherwise so please dont go there with statements like that. Edited October 20, 2019 by Shadwell Dog 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 I was at the egm too mate. And was very clear to me what he said. I'm no fan of the msg but in this case he certainly wasnt meaning that they would be the msg from now to the end of time. That's just not the case.I am not disputing how he meant it, however it came across as how I and most interpreted at the time 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shadwell Dog Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Back Post Misses said: I am not disputing how he meant it, however it came across as how I and most interpreted at the time You just weren't listening right then mate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 20, 2019 Share Posted October 20, 2019 You just weren't listening right then mate.[emoji23][emoji6]No I haven’t spoken to him - you say you have so that is why I concede your point. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.