Jump to content
Kris.

The Falkirk FC Thread

Recommended Posts

Just now, Long Suffering Bairn said:

Emergency cost cutting signing:  buy Crunchie a new pair of boots.  I know he's 56 but that's all we can afford now    Go Kevin.

need to prise him oot of the bookies in grangemouth then

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh super Ray.... Oh super Rayyyy...

Stole him away for 40k oh super Ray....

f**k Crawford Rae.... f**k Crawford Rae....

We steal his staff and we dont pay f**k Crawford Rae

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, tonnitus said:

Spending £40k for a manager with a 19% win rate, and celebrating.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

That 19% is a spectacular win rate with the shit he inherited so get it right up ye :thumsup2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, HopeStreetPieStall said:

Nope, sorry. The outcome as weeks ago. You don't need to wait and see what the punishment was, we were guilty. 

 

You know full well there will be no private case brought. That was never dependent on any SFA investigation. Yet more bluster and bullshit from Morton fans. Only saving grace is that it's you and not Branch Ton.

There was possibility of appeals 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Back Post Misses said:

it really is, the panel particularly unimpressed with RM version of events, need to pay up and move on IMO,....... saying that i'm sure this is pretty normal in the football world, just that unfortunately for us its down in black and white in this case

Edited by falkirkzombie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The first image shows why a further court case won’t happen, and why there is room to appeal should they wish. “Balance of probability” isn’t proof of anything.

The second image shows how badly the document was cobbled together. Read the last sentence. Who proof read that howler?E1B5D818-2602-40EF-A80A-7494EE5D20FB.thumb.jpeg.1423fa1d098ccb88d6bb8cafc8b759af.jpeg

E6CC71DA-9A52-4CBC-8BBB-25E91DE846EE.jpeg

Edited by Duncan Freemason

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Duncan Freemason said:

The first image shows why a further court case won’t happen, and why there is room to appeal should they wish. “Balance of probability” isn’t proof of anything.

The second image shows how badly the document was cobbled together. Read the last sentence. Who proof read that howler?E1B5D818-2602-40EF-A80A-7494EE5D20FB.thumb.jpeg.1423fa1d098ccb88d6bb8cafc8b759af.jpeg

E6CC71DA-9A52-4CBC-8BBB-25E91DE846EE.jpeg

The whole document is littered with errors, from simple grammar to entire words being missed out and also leaves you to work out who Mr Sherry is yourself without any explanation prior to his name being mentioned. Doesn't paint the SPFL in a very professional light. However, it paints us in an even worse light. Banter aside (GIRUY Crawford) Lang and Campbell should go, this should be the final nail in their ever sealing coffin. 

Oot. Now,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That will be reduced on appeal. Just imagine, if the Morten chairman even had a sliver of intelligence and let us speak to Ray in the first place, that £30k or so could be sitting in their bank account rather than going to the SPFL :lol: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Rugster said:

The whole document is littered with errors, from simple grammar to entire words being missed out and also leaves you to work out who Mr Sherry is yourself without any explanation prior to his name being mentioned. Doesn't paint the SPFL in a very professional light. However, it paints us in an even worse light. Banter aside (GIRUY Crawford) Lang and Campbell should go, this should be the final nail in their ever sealing coffin. 

Oot. Now,

The balance of probability is that the document was put together by a half wit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Back Post Misses said:

Is it not just a report on what happens day in day out when it comes to football and players and managers?   Agent makes team aware that client would be interested in being their manager.  Team asks what contract manager is on.  Team have a chat and make the decision that they would like said manager.  Team tell said managers agent that they would be interested.  Team then phone managers chairman and ask for permission to speak to manager. Chairman pulls a ridiculous number out of his head in terms of compensation to speak to manager.  Team laugh at that number and tell managers agent they arent paying anything like that and that if the manager wants to come to falkirk he'll have to resign.  Manager complains to chairman that he wants to speak to falkirk.  Chairman ludicrously gives the manager right to speak to falkirk but not about terms of the job etc( what the feck is all that about) .  Manager resigns  and moves to Falkirk.  Now normally at this stage some form of sensible compensation would be worked out between the clubs but instead Morton decide to go to the SPFL and start greeting which has ended up with them getting absolutely nowt instead of a sensible sum for breaking a years employment . I don't think we've done anything much different from most apart from maybe not asking for permission to speak to the backroom staff perhaps.

Edited by Shodwall cat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Love it when the Falkirk leagle eagles come out the woodwork again talking like they have a clue about anything.

I'll be back when we get our compensation. 150k spent on compo, big wage January signings and relegation anyway. Glorious.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, port-ton said:

Love it when the Falkirk leagle eagles come out the woodwork again talking like they have a clue about anything.

I'll be back when we get our compensation. 150k spent on compo, big wage January signings and relegation anyway. Glorious.

Nearly as good as the Greenock Legal Eagles that seem to everything about employment law.

On another note the most f*cked up thing about it was M Lang wasnt allowed to take the case for Falkirk's behalf as she is a working lawyer how f\*cked up is that one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Love it when the Falkirk leagle eagles come out the woodwork again talking like they have a clue about anything.

I'll be back when we get our compensation. 150k spent on compo, big wage January signings and relegation anyway. Glorious.


So thankfully you’ll never be back then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...