Jump to content

The Falkirk FC Thread


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, HopeStreetPieStall said:

Is that not slightly galling then? Being owned by someone so marvellously wealthy, yet still being so consistently average season after season.

I think Easdale’s wealth is often overstated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bairnardo said:

Bainsford has been AWOL for long enough that a double announcement is the only plausible explanation.

Even if he quote this post denying it, its still definitely true.

Definitely true... LALALALALALALALALALA

Yep, we need a couple of signings to freshen things up...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bairnardo said:
5 minutes ago, HopeStreetPieStall said:
[mention=54598]Bainsfordbairn[/mention] wouldn't do that to us, would they?

Quoted for no other reason than to rattle his phone one more time

says at the bottom of the page he was 'recently browsing'..........which means he's reading this but hasn't posted any reply.......Hmmmmmm, suspicious!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, NewBornBairn said:

and spots there's £100,000 less than he thought?

You’re in LaLaLand. 

The imposition of the penalty simply confirms the level of malfeasance on the part of your mob. Separate actions against club and the snakes are likely to follow for recovery of costs etc.

Given your CEO is a lawyer and was involved  you, and she, should give serious consideration to findings of fact that Falkirk’s statement of facts was incomplete, in that dates etc of some telephone calls were omitted, and that McKinnon’s oral evidence was unreliable.  Falkirk, having no class, don’t do ethics though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You’re in LaLaLand. 
The imposition of the penalty simply confirms the level of malfeasance on the part of your mob. Separate actions against club and the snakes are likely to follow for recovery of costs etc.
Given your CEO is a lawyer and was involved  you, and she, should give serious consideration to findings of fact that Falkirk’s statement of facts was incomplete, in that dates etc of some telephone calls were omitted, and that McKinnon’s oral evidence was unreliable.  Falkirk, having no class, don’t do ethics though.
f**k off you freak
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, #Gary said:

Not sure why Falkirk fans are seeing this as a result.

40k + 3k + whatever compensation to Morton + over 60k wage to shit manager getting you relegated to the seasides.

 

Sounds marvellous...

Good points, well made. We’ll make sure we take them on board for the debrief.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You’re in LaLaLand. 
The imposition of the penalty simply confirms the level of malfeasance on the part of your mob. Separate actions against club and the snakes are likely to follow for recovery of costs etc.
Given your CEO is a lawyer and was involved  you, and she, should give serious consideration to findings of fact that Falkirk’s statement of facts was incomplete, in that dates etc of some telephone calls were omitted, and that McKinnon’s oral evidence was unreliable.  Falkirk, having no class, don’t do ethics though.

Do you need a [emoji847]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...