Jump to content

The Falkirk FC Thread


Recommended Posts

No issues with the patrons group looking to add to their members. No different to FSS looking for members too, it’s all relative to what someone can afford to pop in either as a one off or monthly via PayPal. 

It’s all income to the club at the end of the day and helps increase the fans voice too. What fans would have an issue with this? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I certainly wouldn’t invest unless I was sure the whole projected loss was being covered as, if not, it’s just money down the drain.

Even 25 at £10k is well short of the loss.

Expect the auditors will need to be satisfied that they have the funds in place to meet any shortfall  before signing off the Accounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Dawson Park Boy said:

I certainly wouldn’t invest unless I was sure the whole projected loss was being covered as, if not, it’s just money down the drain.

Even 25 at £10k is well short of the loss.

Expect the auditors will need to be satisfied that they have the funds in place to meet any shortfall  before signing off the Accounts.

Any increase on budgeted match ticket sales, retail, hospitality, sponsorship etc eats into any shortfall too. Doesn’t all fall on FSS and the Patrons increasing payments. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Springfield said:

Unclear of your post, you refer to the auditors as copied below. Is there a bigger issue than the reported 400K?

”the auditors will need to be satisfied that they have the funds in place to meet any shortfall  before signing off the Accounts.

They need to be satisfied that the company is a going concern which means they need to be sure funds are in place to cover the losses. Otherwise they will need to qualify the Accounts which has consequences.

They will need to examine the management accounts to verify the accuracy of the projected loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shodwall cat said:

Boy mochrie looked a right player on Saturday.  

He played well in the 2nd half and showed some excellent touches but he had a great chance, which admittedly he made himself, then completely lacked composure in front of goal thankfully.

Utd sending him to a team managed by McPake also seems like a strange choice. During his whole managerial career, McPake has been a massive advocate of long ball tactics and I’m not sure how Mochrie fits into that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Grangemouth Bairn said:

He played well in the 2nd half and showed some excellent touches but he had a great chance, which admittedly he made himself, then completely lacked composure in front of goal thankfully.

Utd sending him to a team managed by McPake also seems like a strange choice. During his whole managerial career, McPake has been a massive advocate of long ball tactics and I’m not sure how Mochrie fits into that.

Did we not back off from taking him?

Would certainly suit our style better than Dunfermlines blooter  up the park stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Reggie Perrin said:

Did we not back off from taking him?

Would certainly suit our style better than Dunfermlines blooter  up the park stuff.

I’d guess it was more to do with affordability ? Dunfermline will have a bigger budget than us I’d expect.

Agree, I think it’d be tough for more technical players to fit into a McPake team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Springfield said:

Arthur Montford - you could put all these cheeks/cretins into one brain, wouldn’t touch good old Arthur.

Arthur? A complete amateur versus the one true God of Scottish Football Commentators, Historians, Analysts…….Bob Crampsey. There will never be better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Reggie Perrin said:

Did we not back off from taking him?

Would certainly suit our style better than Dunfermlines blooter  up the park stuff.

We signed Lawal instead, seemingly weren't happy with the wages United were after. I think Mcpake had to beg the scum board in order to stump up for it and sign him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess “agenda posturing” (for want of a better term), is part and parcel of just about every football forum. It’s like everything…….if it’s of no interest, it’s just a matter of reading it or not, or commentating or not.

The days of discussing solely players, tactics and results are long gone, and let’s be honest, this “agenda” behind the scenes stuff is just as likely to reveal reasons for our season (any season) being less than we hoped for…..even when those hopes seem to be very very modest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Duncan Freemason said:

I guess “agenda posturing” (for want of a better term), is part and parcel of just about every football forum. It’s like everything…….if it’s of no interest, it’s just a matter of reading it or not, or commentating or not.

The days of discussing solely players, tactics and results are long gone, and let’s be honest, this “agenda” behind the scenes stuff is just as likely to reveal reasons for our season (any season) being less than we hoped for…..even when those hopes seem to be very very modest.

I have one agenda and that is to see the survival of FFC and, hopefully, it’s progression to higher leagues.

Previous boards have messed up big time and the new incumbents started  off with a poor hand with a minus position at 1st June 2021 and players contracted who were far below the standard we need.

Its now up to the current board to steer us into better times and they have done well in getting a real management team in M and S.

However, the big problem is getting us through this season and, hopefully, that’s what the main focus is on.

We need cash and lots of it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see tomorrow night's game is on PPV.

Anyone able to confirm if you can Chromecast or similar the games to a TV?

Happy to pay 12 quid for the pleasure but less inclined if I have to sit and watch it on my phone.

Cheers.

Not 100% ruled out taking a drive through yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Dawson Park Boy said:

I have one agenda and that is to see the survival of FFC and, hopefully, it’s progression to higher leagues.

Previous boards have messed up big time and the new incumbents started  off with a poor hand with a minus position at 1st June 2021 and players contracted who were far below the standard we need.

Its now up to the current board to steer us into better times and they have done well in getting a real management team in M and S.

However, the big problem is getting us through this season and, hopefully, that’s what the main focus is on.

We need cash and lots of it.

 

Are we not going to make it through this season ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Grangemouth Bairn said:

Are we not going to make it through this season ?

A question that could legitimately be asked of at least 50% of clubs most years. As ever, the answer is “it depends”. In our case, it depends on us closing (and being seen to close) our much spoken of £400k blackhole. It’s all about cash right now, today (with the hope that club restructuring sees the gross mismanagement of previous years be consigned to the bin). For me, there are a good number of individuals that should never be welcomed back to TFS, but that of course, fixes none of the damage. I think anyone from FSS to PG to BoD will be up for anything ideas wise that will help close that gap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, H Wragg said:

I see tomorrow night's game is on PPV.

Anyone able to confirm if you can Chromecast or similar the games to a TV?

Happy to pay 12 quid for the pleasure but less inclined if I have to sit and watch it on my phone.

Cheers.

Not 100% ruled out taking a drive through yet.

When the games were free to ST holders I used my chromecast to get it on my TV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...