Jump to content

The Falkirk FC Thread


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, IR1970 said:

And Thistles...he wont be the only one who voted with that thinking..Easy way to make sure he doesn't get the money

Falkirk fans are rivalling the two ugly sisters for how self centred they are. 

Clubs will have voted to end the season due to the minimum 70k payout for prize money. 
 

Heard you’re all boycotting away games, will save you all the hassle of watching 2 away defeats at broadwood. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, SLClyde said:

Falkirk fans are rivalling the two ugly sisters for how self centred they are. 

Clubs will have voted to end the season due to the minimum 70k payout for prize money. 
 

Heard you’re all boycotting away games, will save you all the hassle of watching 2 away defeats at broadwood. 

Quite happy to be be self centred rather than supporting a rapist. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/football/5484409/dundee-could-propose-league-reconstruction-spfl-nelms/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=scottishsunfootballfacebook&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1586641056

They may or may nothave played a blinder. This plan, if voted in, would still allow for Rangers and Celtic to have their 4 games against each other.

Problem is the SPFL know premiership clubs will more or likely vote down reconstruction so if they were to say “say yes and we’ll propose reconstruction”, knowing fine well it won’t get voted through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/football/5484409/dundee-could-propose-league-reconstruction-spfl-nelms/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=scottishsunfootballfacebook&utm_source=Facebook#Echobox=1586641056

They may or may nothave played a blinder. This plan, if voted in, would still allow for Rangers and Celtic to have their 4 games against each other.

Problem is the SPFL know premiership clubs will more or likely vote down reconstruction so if they were to say “say yes and we’ll propose reconstruction”, knowing fine well it won’t get voted through.

It also allows for the introduction of 2 colt teams. Possible way of incentivising them.
It may mean promotion for us but if it includes Colts I say f**k that......
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Bantabairn said:

Just listened to ICT chairman on the actions of ICT, Partick & Dundee. Firstly thought the guy was speaking with integrity and honesty with a clear account of what these three clubs agreed to vote yesterday. 
 Can’t wait until Rangers and/or Dundee tell us what went on, just can’t make it up now.

ICT chairman,ex Dundee board,worked for Rangers,a blue nose Scott Gardiner does not smack of integrity and honesty

Dundee can nip this in the bud right now but have strangely gone underground

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rovers_Lad said:

ICT chairman,ex Dundee board,worked for Rangers,a blue nose Scott Gardiner does not smack of integrity and honesty

Dundee can nip this in the bud right now but have strangely gone underground

Don't think it's strange at all.

With the allegations Rangers are making, we've undoubtedly been consulting our legal team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, roman_bairn said:


It also allows for the introduction of 2 colt teams. Possible way of incentivising them.
It may mean promotion for us but if it includes Colts I say f**k that......

Could also mean they allow both Kelty and Brora, they did say they want to expand the SFL by a couple of teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Back Post Misses said:

 


Did Airdrie not vote no too?

 

The only other team that voted no was Edinburgh City as they are near as in the same boat as us chance of going up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, roman_bairn said:


That would be our preference, but the OF may only go for restructuring if they get their way...

Doncasters comments to the Evening times last week was to expand the SPFL to allow a couple of teams entre if that is the case then this could be the opportunity either that the other thing they could propose which soemone posted last week was 2 leagues of 16 outside the premiership which would mean needing to find another 10 teams add kelty and brora and then you have 8 and if what GS prpoposed comes to fruition you then have the colt teams being shoehorning in which is a non starter for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doncasters comments to the Evening times last week was to expand the SPFL to allow a couple of teams entre if that is the case then this could be the opportunity either that the other thing they could propose which soemone posted last week was 2 leagues of 16 outside the premiership which would mean needing to find another 10 teams add kelty and brora and then you have 8 and if what GS prpoposed comes to fruition you then have the colt teams being shoehorning in which is a non starter for me.

Yes perhaps, but what I think is being missed is the OF can vote reconstruction down unless there’s something in it for them meaning that Highland and Lowland teams have little chance. Not that Brora want it anyway from past comments...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Forfar chairmens comments are the reason we are in the situation we are in 4 pay days with a decent away support of Falkirk and partick say 1000 away support looking at near 68k when you consider prize money is 70k for the season for bottom placed club. Admittedly any club is voting for their own self interests the issue is the voting structure isnt a fair on a number of teams Turkeys voting for christmas springs to mind but then if you had the chance to increase your clubs finances in keeping us down and dragging partick down then they are going to do it.

The SPFL i.e. Doncaster is going to go with whatever deflects any blame from him and isnt the one being held responsible for end result he can simply say the clubs voted for it but in that theres no leadership merely a deflection of blame and shirking responsibility. That being said to i reckon that Doncaster would take the fairest route to it no i dont as we would end up with the league called as it is and we would still dip out. Which brings on to any future vote being unfair as they are going to keep voting on the same thing till the result is what they want (pretty much the same as Brexit)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...