Jump to content

The Falkirk FC Thread


Recommended Posts

But I thought we were going to have to pay Morton £250k, get a transfer ban and get a points deduction?

Pray for Branchton at this tough time. His seethe will be spectacular. Nows the time to swap McKee for Tidser just for extra bants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Long Suffering Bairn said:

Emergency cost cutting signing:  buy Crunchie a new pair of boots.  I know he's 56 but that's all we can afford now    Go Kevin.

need to prise him oot of the bookies in grangemouth then

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Ecosse83
Just now, tonnitus said:

Spending £40k for a manager with a 19% win rate, and celebrating.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

That 19% is a spectacular win rate with the shit he inherited so get it right up ye :thumsup2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, HopeStreetPieStall said:

Nope, sorry. The outcome as weeks ago. You don't need to wait and see what the punishment was, we were guilty. 

 

You know full well there will be no private case brought. That was never dependent on any SFA investigation. Yet more bluster and bullshit from Morton fans. Only saving grace is that it's you and not Branch Ton.

There was possibility of appeals 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Back Post Misses said:

it really is, the panel particularly unimpressed with RM version of events, need to pay up and move on IMO,....... saying that i'm sure this is pretty normal in the football world, just that unfortunately for us its down in black and white in this case

Edited by falkirkzombie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first image shows why a further court case won’t happen, and why there is room to appeal should they wish. “Balance of probability” isn’t proof of anything.

The second image shows how badly the document was cobbled together. Read the last sentence. Who proof read that howler?E1B5D818-2602-40EF-A80A-7494EE5D20FB.thumb.jpeg.1423fa1d098ccb88d6bb8cafc8b759af.jpeg

E6CC71DA-9A52-4CBC-8BBB-25E91DE846EE.jpeg

Edited by Duncan Freemason
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Duncan Freemason said:

The first image shows why a further court case won’t happen, and why there is room to appeal should they wish. “Balance of probability” isn’t proof of anything.

The second image shows how badly the document was cobbled together. Read the last sentence. Who proof read that howler?E1B5D818-2602-40EF-A80A-7494EE5D20FB.thumb.jpeg.1423fa1d098ccb88d6bb8cafc8b759af.jpeg

E6CC71DA-9A52-4CBC-8BBB-25E91DE846EE.jpeg

The whole document is littered with errors, from simple grammar to entire words being missed out and also leaves you to work out who Mr Sherry is yourself without any explanation prior to his name being mentioned. Doesn't paint the SPFL in a very professional light. However, it paints us in an even worse light. Banter aside (GIRUY Crawford) Lang and Campbell should go, this should be the final nail in their ever sealing coffin. 

Oot. Now,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...