Jump to content

The Falkirk FC Thread

Kris.

By Kris.
in Scottish League 1 General Chatter

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 205.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Shadwell Dog

    8199

  • Bairnardo

    6850

  • ShaggerG

    3960

  • FFC 1876

    3873

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Rocco
Rocco

A night of mixed emotions for me.    Been a Falkirk fan all my life but always played football on a Saturday so it wasn’t until the 17/18 that I got a season ticket with my Dad. We’ve been devo

Shandon Par
Shandon Par
Long Suffering Bairn
Long Suffering Bairn

I am a carer for my disabled partner so rarely get out of the house.  A charity in Edinburgh who are for carers asked me if they could do anything for me so I could have some respite and get me out of

Posted Images

Bairnardo

Bairnardo

Posted
Posted
See even if we have taken McKinnon illegally or whatever, its worth it for the patter imho
This. Their fans can revisit it all they want, but what Ray built in a short time had them all soaking at the prospect of a first dig at any sort of relevance in most of their lifetimes.

Instead, well...... Here we are.
2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
AL-FFC

AL-FFC

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, Branch Ton said:

i read that your case was being presented by your lady lawyer,  whether because of shortage of funds or arrogance I am not sure. Given that she is also avwitness I would imagine she is still cross examining herself. 

Its a hearing by the SFA into a diddy football club losing there manager to another football club not a murder trial at the High Court ya nugget youve been watching too much LA Law on TV

0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ShaggerG

ShaggerG

Posted
Posted
Just now, Branch Ton said:

i read that your case was being presented by your lady lawyer,  whether because of shortage of funds or arrogance I am not sure. Given that she is also avwitness I would imagine she is still cross examining herself. 

Can you tell me where you read this mate? Would like to check that out.

0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Branch Ton

Branch Ton

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, AL-FFC said:

Its a hearing by the SFA into a diddy football club losing there manager to another football club not a murder trial at the High Court ya nugget youve been watching too much LA Law on TV

How else is she going to prove she didn’t tap him up and then that his contract with Morton had been terminated. Even an oral contract requires 7 days notice. If she didn’t agree to buy his early release the guy who appeared in your dug out v Ross County and who did business for you on.dead day was still  Morton’s manager. That’s as bad as it gets and why proper shysters leave it a some days before they make a tapping appointment. You don’t seem to be able to even do the bad stuff properly.

0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Senor Bairn

Senor Bairn

Posted
Posted
Just now, Branch Ton said:

How else is she going to prove she didn’t tap him up and then that his contract with Morton had been terminated. Even an oral contract requires 7 days notice. If she didn’t agree to buy his early release the guy who appeared in your dug out v Ross County and who did business for you on.dead day was still  Morton’s manager. That’s as bad as it gets and why proper shysters leave it a some days before they make a tapping appointment. You don’t seem to be able to even do the bad stuff properly.

oi oi

1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bairnardo

Bairnardo

Posted
Posted
How else is she going to prove she didn’t tap him up and then that his contract with Morton had been terminated. Even an oral contract requires 7 days notice. If she didn’t agree to buy his early release the guy who appeared in your dug out v Ross County and who did business for you on.dead day was still  Morton’s manager. That’s as bad as it gets and why proper shysters leave it a some days before they make a tapping appointment. You don’t seem to be able to even do the bad stuff properly.
In what court anywhere in the land does the accused have to prove they didn't do something?

And Ray wasnt in the dugout against Ross County.

Hard lines

Now please f**k off you absolute gimp.
7
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ShaggerG

ShaggerG

Posted
Posted
Just now, Branch Ton said:

How else is she going to prove she didn’t tap him up and then that his contract with Morton had been terminated. Even an oral contract requires 7 days notice. If she didn’t agree to buy his early release the guy who appeared in your dug out v Ross County and who did business for you on.dead day was still  Morton’s manager. That’s as bad as it gets and why proper shysters leave it a some days before they make a tapping appointment. You don’t seem to be able to even do the bad stuff properly.

Didn't know Hartley's assistant was ever Morton's manager. Poor try TBH,

3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
EdiBairn

EdiBairn

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Branch Ton said:

How else is she going to prove she didn’t tap him up and then that his contract with Morton had been terminated. Even an oral contract requires 7 days notice. If she didn’t agree to buy his early release the guy who appeared in your dug out v Ross County and who did business for you on.dead day was still  Morton’s manager. That’s as bad as it gets and why proper shysters leave it a some days before they make a tapping appointment. You don’t seem to be able to even do the bad stuff properly.

Think you'll find the burden of proof is on the accuser. She doesn't need to prove anything.

0
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ShaggerG

ShaggerG

Posted
Posted
Just now, Bairnardo said:

In what court anywhere in the land does the accused have to prove they didn't do something?

And Ray wasnt in the dugout against Ross County.

Hard lines

Now please f**k off you absolute gimp.

^^^^^^^^^^^

Fastest finger first!

1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bainsfordbairn

Bainsfordbairn

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Branch Ton said:

i read that your case was being presented by your lady lawyer,  whether because of shortage of funds or arrogance I am not sure. Given that she is also avwitness I would imagine she is still cross examining herself. 

As usual, you have no idea what’s going on. Margaret was there as a witness only. The defence was handled by a separate lawyer. 

2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest

Guest

Posted
Posted
How else is she going to prove she didn’t tap him up and then that his contract with Morton had been terminated. Even an oral contract requires 7 days notice. If she didn’t agree to buy his early release the guy who appeared in your dug out v Ross County and who did business for you on.dead day was still  Morton’s manager. That’s as bad as it gets and why proper shysters leave it a some days before they make a tapping appointment. You don’t seem to be able to even do the bad stuff properly.


In a place where people frequently make roaring c***s of themselves you are the king of roaring c***s
0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...