Jump to content

Unpopular opinions.


Recommended Posts

Democracy is a waste of time. Get everyone out of Westminster and Buckingham Palace, machine gun them into the Thames and let someone  with tanks, shiny boots and an inordinate amount of medals on his smart uniform run the place. Graeme Souness could do the job IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hand As Porn said:

Democracy is a waste of time. Get everyone out of Westminster and Buckingham Palace, machine gun them into the Thames and let someone  with tanks, shiny boots and an inordinate amount of medals on his smart uniform run the place. Graeme Souness could do the job IMO. 

My mate posted pictures of himself having breakfast with Graeme Souness in a hotel the other day. Said he was a thoroughly nice man. He didn't mention whether he thought he was dictator material though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Dee Man said:

My mate posted pictures of himself having breakfast with Graeme Souness in a hotel the other day. Said he was a thoroughly nice man. He didn't mention whether he thought he was dictator material though. 

That's the measure of him. He can talk to the everyman. Jocky Scott is another obvious candidate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NJ2 said:

Somewhat overlooking the only real candidates; Mr’s Dick and Ian Campbell. Can inspire. Can divide. Can conquer.

You could be on to something. Dick would have to scrub up a bit but he could capture the Pinochet look. Anyone who says "mac n chesse" or starts a sentence with "So" to be thrown out of a helicopter 5,000 ft above Gayfield. 

Augusto-Pinochet-Hero-AB.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2018 at 16:47, Crroma said:

If i painted my face black to portray a character that isn't racism unless you are one of the increasingly more common extreme leftist ninnies who insist on being upset at everyeverything

How the f**k can some people still not understand that history plays a fairly crucial part in determining racist connotations?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Honest_Man#1 said:

How the f**k can some people still not understand that history plays a fairly crucial part in determining racist connotations?

1. because they don't know their history

2. because while important, it's not conclusive, yet a lot of people act like it is, prompting an opposite reaction from dissenters.

 

You're welcs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Margaret Thatcher said:

1. because they don't know their history

2. because while important, it's not conclusive, yet a lot of people act like it is, prompting an opposite reaction from dissenters.

 

You're welcs

On point 2, blacking up has wildly racist connotations because it was used historically to ridicule and torment the entire race. It’s conclusive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Honest_Man#1 said:

On point 2, blacking up has wildly racist connotations because it was used historically to ridicule and torment the entire race. It’s conclusive.

It is not, because what if the person is not aware of that, or they were forced to do it at knife point, or they needed to portray a character and felt this need tipped the balance, or they consulted with a black peoples interest group, or they are actually a pale mixed race person and you don't realise, or they are doing a tribute for Rememberance, or they have a principled stand that it doesn't matter as long they know their intentions are not racist, or, or, or, or...

Both camps - left and right - discredit themselves by this tendency towards lazy absolutism.

Edited by Margaret Thatcher
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Margaret Thatcher said:

It is not, because what if the person is not aware of that

Pretty much the only valid reason. When people point out that blacking up is regarded as offensive because of its history people who still want to black up afterwards are easily identified as twats. Unfortunately, it is hard to distinguish the ignorant from the twats without a lengthy discussion and so ignorant blacked up  people are pilloried on the assumption that they are twats.

Same goes for people who wear swastika armbands because they are into Hinduism or pointy headed ghost outfits because they are portraying a dead conehead.

As an aside, I also know a white lassie who managed to successfully dress up as Eazy E without blacking up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, The OP said:

Pretty much the only valid reason. When people point out that blacking up is regarded as offensive because of its history people who still want to black up afterwards are easily identified as twats. Unfortunately, it is hard to distinguish the ignorant from the twats without a lengthy discussion and so ignorant blacked up  people are pilloried on the assumption that they are twats.

Same goes for people who wear swastika armbands because they are into Hinduism or pointy headed ghost outfits because they are portraying a dead conehead.

As an aside, I also know a white lassie who managed to successfully dress up as Eazy E without blacking up.

I don’t think ignorance is a valid excuse. Maybe once if you’re being kind, but these days I don’t think it’s acceptable to blame stupidity and a refusal to learn for people making racist statements.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, The OP said:

As an aside, I also know a white lassie who managed to successfully dress up as Eazy E without blacking up.

That's cultural appropriation, so she's an insensitive racist.

Ignorance is not a valid excuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The OP said:

No it’s not - you don’t understand the things you rant on about on a daily basis, that much is clear.

Your racism enabling is vile.

We must crush your brand of white entitlement to black culture, and white supremacy itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Hand As Porn said:

Democracy is a waste of time. Get everyone out of Westminster and Buckingham Palace, machine gun them into the Thames and let someone  with tanks, shiny boots and an inordinate amount of medals on his smart uniform run the place. Graeme Souness could do the job IMO. 

this boy had tanks, shiny boots and hunners o' medals. he was also a bit shite. 

breznhev.jpg.6868342d9bd758db44787d32cffcb29a.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...