miko Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 who told you that david cameron Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bullywee Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 who told you that, annabel goldie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 who told you that david cameron Who told me what about David Cameron? who told you that, annabel goldie? To your credit, you at least managed the question mark and comma allowing the sentence to make vague sense, but you still couldn't capitalise proper nouns and the first letter of the first word of a sentence. It remains a shame that the response bears no relevance to the topic or semblance to reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miko Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 yawn take your finger out your ass dickweed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miko Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 and since you want to get all wanky tory boy you mean semblance of not to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 and since you want to get all wanky tory boy you mean semblance of not to. I refer you to definition 4. Both are equally acceptable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
monkeyblair Posted March 12, 2010 Author Share Posted March 12, 2010 Sorry i have to call bullshit on this one. Did you take into consideration tourists and particular areas where there will be more P+B users? Law of averages and all that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
An Sionnach Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 I did note that but chose not to be a pedant Pedant is an anagram of Panted. Something subliminally Freudian is happening to your psyche, big boy! To your credit, you at least managed the question mark and comma allowing the sentence to make vague sense, but you still couldn't capitalise proper nouns and the first letter of the first word of a sentence. It remains a shame that the response bears no relevance to the topic or semblance to reality. yawn take your finger out your ass dickweed and since you want to get all wanky tory boy you mean semblance of not to. I normally find miko's posts to be uneccesarily harsh, crude and confrontational. I like those two, though! Spot on! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tryfield Posted March 12, 2010 Share Posted March 12, 2010 Did you know that there are more John Smiths than Nana Miskouri's in the world? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miko Posted March 13, 2010 Share Posted March 13, 2010 I refer you to definition 4. Both are equally acceptable. not in the way you used it, I refer you back to your own link 'some semblance of justice (reality)'/'her story bears some semblance to THE truth' therefore you used it incorrectly, then tried to mock my english. btw are you also aware elitism would see you sterilised ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted March 13, 2010 Share Posted March 13, 2010 not in the way you used it, I refer you back to your own link 'some semblance of justice (reality)'/'her story bears some semblance to THE truth' therefore you used it incorrectly, then tried to mock my english. btw are you also aware elitism would see you sterilised ? Use of the definite article does not preclude the use of the word "to" in that context. Both are equally acceptable. Justice is an indefinite concept and emotive, hence the use of semblance "of" (it is qualitative). The Truth and Reality are definite concepts, which can be reached by exactitude. Hence the preposition "to" is, if anything more apt. I did not use it incorrectly. I pointed out that what you wrote didn't actually make sense, whereas what I posted made perfect sense. P.S. Elitism may well see me sterilised, but it would see you shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miko Posted March 13, 2010 Share Posted March 13, 2010 not likely tory boy but then I'm not the one claiming its natural anyway am I as for semblance see how many semblance ofs you see here http://www.yourdictionary.com/examples/semblance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miko Posted March 13, 2010 Share Posted March 13, 2010 "Of course, anyone with even the slightest semblance of intelligence won't reply." I wish I'd read that before this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted March 13, 2010 Share Posted March 13, 2010 not likely tory boy but then I'm not the one claiming its natural anyway am I as for semblance see how many semblance ofs you see here http://www.yourdictionary.com/examples/semblance Your point isn't relevant. None of them preclude the use of "semblance to". It merely suggests that "semblance of" is the more common. Now crawl back under your rock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miko Posted March 13, 2010 Share Posted March 13, 2010 Your point isn't relevant. None of them preclude the use of "semblance to". It merely suggests that "semblance of" is the more common. Now crawl back under your rock. also that semblance to is bad english and incorrect usage, dont feel so smart now do you thats what you get for being snidey tory boy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted March 13, 2010 Share Posted March 13, 2010 also that semblance to is bad english and incorrect usage, dont feel so smart now do you thats what you get for being snidey tory boy No. On a point of fact, the preferred choice of word does not preclude alternatives. I can only presume that your continued supposed ineptitude at using the English language is deliberate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miko Posted March 13, 2010 Share Posted March 13, 2010 I would suggest if they were alternatives they would have been listed as such or there would have been some examples in which they were used, there was not, ergo....... as for my style of writing when you grow up a little you'll realise not everything is a pissing contest and a lot of people don't care about a lot of stuff, you only need to be grammatically correct when you're being marked for it, the rest of the time its just being anal imo, unless thats the way you particularly like to write, this is how I like to write so I do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted March 13, 2010 Share Posted March 13, 2010 I would suggest if they were alternatives they would have been listed as such or there would have been some examples in which they were used, there was not, ergo....... as for my style of writing when you grow up a little you'll realise not everything is a pissing contest and a lot of people don't care about a lot of stuff, you only need to be grammatically correct when you're being marked for it, the rest of the time its just being anal imo, unless thats the way you particularly like to write, this is how I like to write so I do. Shakespeare uses "semblance to" where the definite article is not present I trust your apology will be in perfect English? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miko Posted March 13, 2010 Share Posted March 13, 2010 are you suggesting something written 450 years ago is in perfect english ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miko Posted March 13, 2010 Share Posted March 13, 2010 anyway this is getting pathetic and juvenile and at least one of us is old enough to know better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.