Jump to content

Who's Going To Uni?


Recommended Posts

Making a start to a History essay tonight: 2500 words on 'Did Chartism succeed or fail?'

Something of a temptation to write 'epic fail' 1250 times.

:lol:

How are you going to approach it (out of interest)? I guess a lot of their objectives were met, but not because of anything they actually did! I seem to recall our History teacher telling us that Queen Victoria signed the Chartist's petition about 20 times...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite a natural interest in history the subject is taught and assessed so poorly I will probably drop it next semester for something like criminology or sociology.

Yes, it really is that bad.

There is only so much you can take of Cluny and Hildegard of Bingen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lol:

How are you going to approach it (out of interest)? I guess a lot of their objectives were met, but not because of anything they actually did! I seem to recall our History teacher telling us that Queen Victoria signed the Chartist's petition about 20 times...

I think I'm just going to start rambling and see where it takes me, but it's certainly not going to be too kind to the Chartists - as you say, they achieved pretty much bugger all in the grand scheme of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite a natural interest in history the subject is taught and assessed so poorly I will probably drop it next semester for something like criminology or sociology.

Yes, it really is that bad.

There is only so much you can take of Cluny and Hildegard of Bingen.

But according to Exuberant: Glasgow = brilliant for everything...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite a natural interest in history the subject is taught and assessed so poorly I will probably drop it next semester for something like criminology or sociology.

Yes, it really is that bad.

There is only so much you can take of Cluny and Hildegard of Bingen.

It isn't that bad that you want to take sociology. Trust me, do not put yourself through that ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've done a bit more digging into Stirling University's Honours Classification and I'm actually completely bemused.

Whereas other Universities have a system where 70%+ = 1st, 60%+ = 2:1, 50%+ = 2:2 and 40% + = Third, Stirling appears to completely contradict this.

The grading system works as follows:

1A, 1B, 1C - First

2A, 2B, 2C - 2:1

2D, 2E, 2F - 2:2

3A, 3B, 3C - 3rd

But in an email I've had from last semester it suggests that 2C is 70%.

What's more their bloody website is down :angry: so I can't have a shoofty around the Ruffell Algorithm thing they use :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't it that you only need 40% of the total mark to get a pass? Obviously you won't exactly be hitting honours with that...

No, believe it or not about 40% counts as a third-class Honours degree in most British Universities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ive pretty much dingied the studying. Really cannae go it the now. Hopefully I can still scrape it. Good luck tomorrow anyway the ones that are doing Management.

Same to you.

I've managed a 2A from the project, so it shouldn't take a massive amount of effort to pass.

I've actually done more preparation for this than any other exam ever, purely because of the fact that I read the first half of the book that Friedman's Flattening Forces come from (The World Is Flat).

It's actually pretty interesting, if you're a boring b*****d like me, and if I hadn't only found it yesterday I would've liked to have read the whole thing before this exam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aircraft Structures and Materials 5 tomorrow at half 9 :(

Worst course I have ever done at Uni, with a poor lecturer, shocking quality of notes, absolutely no examples and no indication what is in exam.

The only two past papers are the excact same and I can do them; any deviation from that and I, and I suspect/hope everyone else, will fail spectacularly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Aircraft Structures and Materials 5 tomorrow at half 9 :(

Worst course I have ever done at Uni, with a poor lecturer, shocking quality of notes, absolutely no examples and no indication what is in exam.

The only two past papers are the excact same and I can do them; any deviation from that and I, and I suspect/hope everyone else, will fail spectacularly

Metal, glass and wheels.

There are two wings, a cockpit and some seats.

Nothing difficult about that ;)

I have Finance tomorrow morning at 9. I'm pretty hacked off with myself as I made an arse of the project (worth 25% of the grade) by misunderstanding the question, which means instead of a 1 banding I'll be lucky with a 2. The exam's worth 75%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Saturday's exam was just rewritten past paper questions with some different numbers so should have aced it, and that coupled with 20% FAE Assignment I should be able to get an A; even accounting for the lecturer's random markings.

Last late night library session finished just there and feeling quite confident about Flight Dynamics 4 on Tuesday; could easily have got an A if I started studying a bit earlier but will accept a B if it's coming.

Cannot wait for these to be over

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...