HTG

Correct. If Labour MPs felt unable to support the SNP motion, that's on them - keeping in mind that the reasons they won't support it are: 1. They're terrified of upsetting Israel. 2. They hate the SNP (see Lammy). 3. Starmer is a shitebag. Labour have almost 6 times the number of opposition motion days available to them compared to the SNP. They've had months to put forward a position on Palestine. They did what they did yesterday to avoid looking like a shower of absolute c***s and a divided party (given that a number of them would have voted in favour of the SNP motion in the absence of anything from their own side). Today, they look like a shower of absolute c***s but don't show their level of division ... yet.

No, no Labour MPs are making adverse comments. It's a matter of time until the Labour central office "line to take on Twitter" memo is leaked given that the similarity in the construct of their tweets is remarkable.

Today has only confirmed that there is really no point in the SNP or Plaid continuing to sit in Westminster.

Bear in mind that, as recently as this morning, David Lammy was pretty clear that this is an election year so Labour can't support anything the SNP proposes. Labour are a shower of rat b*****ds. At least the Tories don't try to be sleekit rat b*****ds - they just crack on with it.

Starmer's as big a c**t as Sunak.

Odious wankers.

Badenoch has made a right c**t of this. Never was a politician less appropriately named than James fucking Cleverly. Absolute arsehole.

Good on you Ghislaine - you go girl!

They care about the council tax. However, if c***s like Mone and her ilk (of whom there are many) would maybe stop robbing the public purse for 5 minutes, the council tax maybe wouldn't be going up so much.

Oh dear.

What does that mean though? There is no legal route to self-determination. The right to another referendum lies with the authority of a parliament where Scotland has c10% of available voting rights. That parliament has been asked to approve a referendum and has opted not to. The supreme court has determined that calling a referendum is not within the competence of a Scottish parliament. So, by what measure should any pro-independence Scottish government distance itself from the legal - but futile - route available to it? Winning an election on a ticket promising to go straight to negotiation in the event of victory is fine - if there is someone to negotiate with. There won't be. The UK govt refused point blank to get into any discussion on currency in the last referendum campaign. That left Scotland hanging on a key issue and was very effective. Scotland can start negotiating all it wants but Westminster will simply not get involved and will deem the entire process illegal. I can't see how Scotland can secure its independence legally under current circumstances. No UK govt will ever agree to a referendum again. The bollocks about a generation (of whatever length) is simply a means of kicking the matter into the long grass. Then they'll find any other excuse. That only leaves a non-legal approach - which they would be as well cracking on with to be honest.

That's just an opinion which carries no more value than fly. You've not articulated in any way, shape or form what the legal route to self-determination is for the people of Scotland.

f**k me

Illegal it is then eh? What's the best form of illegal pathway to an independent Scotland?

Can you show us the democratic route to self determination?

Do you know what would be useful - an effective asylum claims processing system.

Maybe he's just one of these c***s that sticks assiduously to the lines he's given. Whatever, he's quickly established himself as the latest of c**t's c***s.

1. Makes bet with odious c**t that he'll deport people to Rwanda 2. Claims he's not a betting man 3. Explains his fondness for spread betting. Only lies when his lips move ... maybe. Absolute b*****d.

Must be a chance that this boy is lying dead in a hovel somewhere. I'm no sure how much damage and pain he'll be suffering without medical support.

King C with the Big C.

I get all of that. Anyone on any side of politics in Northern Ireland will quickly be able to find reasons to distrust political opponents. But most have set that aside to try and make the GF agreement work and avoid more killing. I'll be shocked if Jim Allister has ever been in favour of the GF agreement - I'm not arsed to go hunting to find out though.

Sir Humphrey: So we trust you to make sure that Sir Kier does nothing incisive or divisive over the next few weeks. Sir Arnold: Avoids anything controversial. Sir Humphrey: Expresses no firm opinion about anything at all. Now, is that quite clear? Bernard: Yes, well, I think that’s probably what he was planning to do anyway.