Yes they all went abroad, but all of them (as far as I'm aware) spent their formative years in their homeland before, when it became clear they had immense talent, they transferred to world class academys. We have our own version at Roehampton, although Murray is not a big fan due to issues with Jamie going there. We have kids in the 14-18 age group in these sorts of academys and it is the attitude of these sorts that Murray has questioned. There is a separate issue with getting kids involved in the grass roots of the game, but for me it's not one centred on facilities. I agree completely that the middle class mindset of tennis is an issue, but on both sides of any perceived class divide. More public facilities would certainly be a benefit, but number for me is far more important than quality. If kids can be encouraged to pick up a racket and show potential with it, it's no more expensive to have a kid playing tennis than it is football. Clubs will happily help out anyone showing potential with membership fees if need be, I think too many people still see it as a sport not for them because it's considered middle class. Though there can be no doubt that some of the older generation of tennis players don't enjoy it, there is a definite shift for the better in the youngsters getting involved in the game at grassroots level. It's the attitudes of those who have the talent to make it to the top that really need improving though.