Hugh G Heid

There were three spin offs from M*A*S*H. you forgot Trapper John (technically a spin off from the movie and I believe W*A*L*T*E*R was a RADAR spin off

So no evidence, quotes or anything to back up your claim that the Trust Board (tossers or otherwise) wanted rid of Darren Young. What a joke you are. Just make shite up and post it without engaging your brain. Are you seriously suggesting the Trust Board were speaking to Craig Levine?

Care to provide evidence to back up your claim?

Any less than two goals behind at Half-time will be an improvement.

Both the physio and the doctor signed motion to get rid of the TrustBoard that was deemed incompetent as it gave no reasons. Pretty clear on where they stand.

You’ve a cheek to refer to Jim Thomson as Kim Jong Thomson. Your above replies border on being North Korean.

That does not excuse the Club Board bullying on LinkedIn from the Club’s account, diverting thousands out of the club’s accounts for purposes they refuse to explain or indeed signing up as much as a hundred people with the intention of rigging the voting of the Supporters Trust to their own ends. Whether you agree with Robert Liston’s original motion or not, the Club Board have behaved exactly in a way which shows there are not fit to run a fan owned club.

That is a very Tory-style reply missing the point completely and trying to put a different spin on it. It is clear that the Club Board did not want to have to the Shareholders EGM because they didn’t want to have to answer the questions on the deliberate removal of (at least) £4000 of Club money to an account that is not a club account. The lack of answers on the night of the Shareholders EGM clearly demonstrated that wrongdoing had occurred otherwise the director involved would not have had to look very guilty not answering the questions put to him. That is why the Club Board wanted the stop on the Shareholders EGM and a the club board showed their hand by trying to trade this with calling off the resolution that they were behind. To suggest that it was a peace initiative in absolute nonsense. You are making a bigger and bigger fool of yourself with every reply.

How humiliating to get your statement on who was behind the Resolution so badly wrong. You’ve been lied to or are lying yourself or more probably just making it up as you go along. I read so many wrong statements that you post it is frightening to think that even you believe them. One of the Trust Board members gave me a taster of what they are trying to achieve with the new board and I liked it, more than liked it actually. When the details are officially unveiled I believe the majority of fans will be in favour of the changes too. The current board have us heading for the Abyss. Fans are underwhelmed by the squad and the friendly results. Doing more of the same is unlikely to be the answer going forward.

That’s an interesting statement that the club board were not behind the resolution to remove the Trust Board but perhaps you should ask the person who yanks your leash why a member of the Club Board offered to cancel the EGM of the Trust (to remove the Trust Board) in exchange for the cancelling of the EGM of Shareholders? You’ve been lied to and you’re swallowing the sh!t you are being fed like a good, well trained boy. Do us a favour and don’t post stuff you clearly have no evidence for and is wildly untrue.

You've changed your tune. The Trust Board reading in the annual club accounts that the chairman has awarded himself £5k followed by £7.5k expenses is hardly the same as the Trust Board "clearing" the payment to him. One of many lines you have been trotting out on the Club Boards behalf. Mind that time you proclaimed you were not a mouth piece for the Chairman and then boasting to the world you had seen the emails from Doyle to the Chairman. Pretty contradictory statements.

Have you got evidence that the £12.5k that Stirling Albion have given to the chairman over two years in "expenses" has ever been known to the Trust Board before they read it in the club accounts? I'm sure someone with their finger on the button and knows the contents of internal club emails would be able to get this information easy. Not suggesting that the chairman does not deserve some recompense for all the hours he puts in but you have made a quite specific allegation with no evidence to back it up.