Thorongil

Indeed. It’s like they can’t read.

To the best of my recollection.

I think Sturgeon was asked about it at the inquiry into her government’s handling of the inquiry into Salmond. I can’t recall exactly but again there was no denial.

Yeah, that was an error as I have explained.

It was only rosy according to the Sturgeon cult which rules the SNP. Dissenters were ruthlessly targeted for years, and many did speak out on these issues only to be disregarded as cranks and bad actors.

Apologies, this should have said “from the Scottish electorate”.

Self ID is not in any of those manifestos. And what are you talking about re “the agreement of all parties”?

My apologies, all key Labour amendments including amendments around criminality and prisons. Which party manifesto proposed Self-ID and how many votes did they get from the Tories electorate?

I don’t see any reference to Self-ID there. Labour even had all of its proposed amendments rejected and still voted for the bill. quite incredible really.

Yes……meaning?

All of whom acted without mandate from the electorate on this issue. The bill in its final extreme and dangerous form were not in any manifesto. Not even close.

I don’t feel for Humza at all. He was in the with the clique and until now has been absolutely loyal to them, refusing to accept any criticism of how the party was run. He’s also a serial liar and a complete incompetent.

And? Your point being?

The relevance of what?

Again, what are you driving at? Are you suggesting that the date on which this became known has any relevant as to whether it actually occurred?

Your point being?

What’s 2018 got to do with it?

His party only has to build a green like level of support on the list and they will hold the balance of power at Holyrood.

As for lying politicians, yes, there’s loads to suggest Sturgeon is a liar. If you can find any evidence to suggest Salmond is a liar, please do let me know.

So you DID look around for it and despite a complete absence of any denial or any evidence saying that it didn’t happen, you are choosing to go with “it might not have, it probably didn’t.” That’s odd.

Which is?

Salmond comes out looking far better. Sturgeon’s legacy and reputation is in tatters and history will now be kind. Very few people now believe they didn’t try to fit Salmond up and even the hysterical press seem to have stopped their witch hunt. He’s becoming more electable by the day. ironically it is only the law which prevents the full truth of what actually happened from being widely known.

My God!

And then the hiding of said f**k ups and the deliberate actions taken to stop other people asking questions. Lying to auditors would also be bad and could cross the threshold to be fraud. I think some of the magic £600k was spent on hefty salaries for their mates being given jobs in the party to do absolutely no work. Like Sue Ruddick in the COO job which was made up for her and the like of Biagi’s independence task force consultant role.

Correct.