Jump to content

Thorongil

Gold Members
  • Posts

    1,816
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Thorongil

  1. 1 minute ago, carpetmonster said:

    It would be in that case. The rules state ‘don’t post what you wouldn’t want your own kids accessing’. 

    Aye the rules is that YOU shouldn’t post what you don’t want your own kids accessing. Ironic really when you want everybody else’s kids to be indoctrinated with gender ideology. 

    Anyway… it’s not that I’M not supposed to post things that YOU wouldn’t want YOUR kids to access, it’s that YOU’RE not supposed to do that. 

    If your kids are sensitive to legal arguments being posted on a football forum based in Scotland, then that is a matter for you, not for me. 

    Worrying that you can’t follow even this basic logic. 

     

  2. 1 minute ago, carpetmonster said:

    You’re lucky I’m not a mod; my kids are American and live in a litigious enough society that the last thing I want them to access is halfwitted ideas that you can threaten legal action against an Internet forum because someone gave you a temporary ban. 

    It’s none of your business though, is it?

  3. 10 minutes ago, carpetmonster said:

    You reckon?

     

    5122472B-0A29-4287-BB11-D0FE6CDA3253.jpeg

    2C483C35-EC8E-4A76-B153-6299EB4523F3.jpeg

    Yeah, I reckon. Wee Bully didn’t get a ban or a warning. I merely defended myself from attack without breaking the rules.

    You illustrated the point perfectly though regarding the discriminatory approach.

  4. 3 minutes ago, carpetmonster said:

    Post it then. 

    I’ll keep that private for now as is my right and in case it is required in future. The moderator was “Andy Dufresne”. He may choose to post it if he so wishes. 

    like I say though, I did not and will not break forum rules so it should not be an issue going forward.

  5. Just now, carpetmonster said:

    I don’t think you can grift folks in a crowdfunder to get a forum account reinstated m9. Although very little would surprise me any more. 

    I have the funds, I don’t need anyone else’s. Anyway, I haven’t broken any forum rules and will not break any rules, so it shouldn’t be an issue.

  6. PS. This website is a commercial entity dealing with the public and must act lawfully. The next moderator who bans me for a month without warning, having broken no rules, simply on account of my protected, sincerely held beliefs, might want to have a think about the recent case involving The Stand and Joanna Cherry KC. 

  7. Question: if gender dysphoria isn’t a medical or mental health illness or condition (stated by the World Health Organisation) then why is there a demand for  “healthcare”, including drugs and surgeries? 

  8. 2 minutes ago, Wee Bully said:

    You really are an utter scumbag. 

    No, I’m not. You just see it that way because you are a narcissist and this causes you to become angry to the very core of your being when you encounter a view that is not in accordance with yours. 

    I don’t lie down to narcissists.

  9. It’s deeply disturbing how lobbyists are seeking to remove all safeguards in order to experiment on children for the purposes of ideology. 

    If gender dysphoria is not a medical or mental illness then why is the NHS removing peoples’s genitals and giving very young people lifetimes supplies of drugs? 

  10. 6 minutes ago, f_c_dundee said:

    I'm genuinely interested in this discussion. You can probably see it's not the first time I've thought about it.

     

    Apart from being honest about my feelings regarding that prisoner, I think I've been relatively calm.

     

    Ok,  ignore discussion of views you don't like 🤷‍♀️

     

    That's why we're here though, because of the demand for #nodebate and the claims about denying trans people exist. Etc etc.

     

     

    Always the tyranny. “I do not like what you are saying even though you are entitled to say it, so I will have you silenced. My fragile ego cannot endure challenge to my worldview”. 

    who do these narcissists think they are? That their version of the truth is not allowed to be challenged?

    Its a failure of character.

  11. Like I said before, I never cared about this issue until fair recently. Self-ID is horrific. the idea that people can just say they are trans or the other gender now is absurd. 

    What a mockery of the journey actual trans people have gone through for years. Self-ID allows people to say they are trans without transitioning, which is such an insult to everyone’s intelligence.

    Its a law that thankfully was so badly conceived that there is no way of ever making it a reality now.

  12. 3 minutes ago, Savage Henry said:

    Primary schools go to see Widow Twankey every Christmas without hurt. 

    Not really the same thing, is it?

    could you answer my question please? What is the benefit of drag queen story time to primary schoolchildren?

  13. 1 hour ago, carpetmonster said:

    So you’re either just making shit up completely, or you’re about to go ‘ah no I’m talking about [male name] Eastwood’. 
     

    The first option validates my post, the second renders you as predictably tedious as it does bigoted. 

    I do not know who this person is.

  14. 1 minute ago, f_c_dundee said:

    Just in the + I think. 🤷‍♀️

     

    You mean the 'woman' aka convicted male murderer in Cornton Vale? 🙁

    Is that a male in a woman’s prison pretending to be a baby and getting given nappies and bottles and whatnot by the prison services?

    I lose track.

  15. Just now, f_c_dundee said:

    Six sexes. Do you really believe that?

     

    Go on, do tell us about them?

     

    The scientific community is really really not united in support of this. That's being a bit economical with the truth. 

     

    Of course science evolves over time and new discoveries are made, do you think insulting our intelligence helps your case?

     

    There are only 2 sexes. One is organised around the purification of large gametes (ova) and one around the production of small gametes (sperm). The existence of anomalies in the development of a small amount of individuals does not change that. No more than the fact that we could be born with only one leg or additional digits means that the number of legs or digits in humans is a spectrum. 

     

     

     

     

    What I don’t get it why they seem to actually want to believe the lies they are telling. What is in it for them? 

×
×
  • Create New...