Zbairn

Difficult to do when you are top o' the league

Moi ?

Interesting that Van's name should be brought up, who has had nothing to say in this discussion whatsoever. As opposed to Mr Grimsdale?, who was very vocal at the start, but seems to have disappeared. I would like to garner his opinion as well, since he had a lot say at the beginning.

We will start talking about footy and the Dundee Utd match officially tomorrow night !

You think ? Dave McInally also e-mailed the club and still comes out with the comment :- "I’m happy to leave it as only replying to what has been said and trying to gain clarity which I don’t think has occurred yet."

I'd be interested in Mr Grimsdale's position re the Rawlins share debate !

What concerns do I have ?

Problem is.... I remember being in the Brockville Bar when Campbell was being lauded as the new saviour of the club. Just as well KJ and a few others had his card marked. There will always be a concern when it's not a Falkirk man who is doling out the cash. We certainly don't want to go down the Campbell route again and I have a lot more confidence in our current BoD to make sure that it doesn't.

Without looking back (really cant be arsed)...can you remember who it was ? Did someone not also state that the Canadians were in the Boardroom at the game on Sat ? Cant remember who that was either.

Apart from the time you called me a "usefully used idiot who can't admit when they are wrong " re the FSS shares issue. I think that is a reasonably fair insult. Interestingly, you could classify yourself (and perhaps a Mr G) in the category of talking mostly about these subjects

This all started with me trying to answer a question posed by Shodwell Cat. I wasn't even asking a question. Then for some reason, a few took umbrage at my answer. No idea why (although I have a rough idea ) .... but hey ho !

I think the problem is that they potentially could get to 45%. Doesn't leave an awful lot to have a majority stake in terms of running the club. One person or small group to be their allies with >5% will do it for them. I believe, where they will have a problem is getting to the 75% needed to change the statutes of the club. But in essence they would have majority votes in all resolutions. I'm not entirely sure what they can do and cant do in respect of making changes to the legal status...... something for the lawyers out there to help with.

Agree...but do you think someone (the right person) will come in with cash for nothing in return ?

Its not rabble rousing or brought up by "usual" posters..., it was trying to answer a question posed by Shadwell. Although some of the "usual" posters are perpetuating the discussion, by arguing against a point of view.

Absolutely...although we are now going around in circles. For someone to put cash in, there needs to be a share issue.