Jump to content

Big Dougie

Gold Members
  • Posts

    313
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Big Dougie

  1. Replacement for Tam Orr who is going in the opposite direction.
  2. Ultimately money talks, no matter the amount, and their no votes will be no more than grandstanding.
  3. That’s the whole point! If it’s a paltry amount then surely they should have the courage if their convictions and reject it?
  4. Why? If they are against the idea then surely it would be hypocritical to take whatever benefits they would get from the teams coming in?
  5. I assume these 5 “good guys” will reject any financial benefits from this agreement? The answer, as we all know, will be of course they won’t. If they are serious about voting no they should be rejecting any money that comes from it.
  6. He is from Glasgow. All 3 we’re pens in my opinion.
  7. It could be argued that Kelty will go into the Brechin game with a bit of momentum (Depending of Saturday’s result).
  8. I’m led to believe they will be Tues 11th and Sat 15th. Brechin will be away in first leg.
  9. If David Cox was sitting on the bench when it happened, then there is no doubt other people will have heard the exchange.
  10. Given the level of legal arbitration that was sought I would be very surprised if Brechin would win any challenge.
  11. You have lost me, what has John Swinney got to do with it?
  12. The HL do not need to justify anything, they made a decision which was within the scope of their rules, which was subsequently ok’d by the SFA legal advisor.
  13. It was never a rule though, so they have acted within their rights as far as I can see.
  14. There is definitely more than one option available in terms of candidates, will be interesting to see what direction the club go with it.
  15. It was an institution alright, just not the type you think it was.
  16. A lot better than the Juniors, who from what I have heard are still dead.
×
×
  • Create New...