Big Dougie
-
Posts
313 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Store
Posts posted by Big Dougie
-
-
On 14/06/2021 at 12:36, virginton said:
They're getting the same patter for being a bunch of quislings, but the likes of Berwick aren't a franchise outfit who represent no community of interest other than their blazers and carful of weirdo fans as well. Either would have me rooting for every relegation until they're playing at the Sunday pub league level; both are grounds for expulsion.
Hurting much???
I don’t understand why you are so bothered to be honest.
-1 -
On 30/06/2021 at 13:27, Gordon EF said:
http://argyle.life/analysis/b-team-myth/
Interesting article, including big-brain Guardiola talking absolute shite.
Yeah, what does he know
-4 -
1 minute ago, oneteaminglasgow said:
I don’t know if my club supports the idea. I know our chief exec was involved in the working group, but I’m not sure what that entailed.
I have let the club know my feelings on the matter on numerous occasions, and I would find it very hard to support the club with the current board in place if they do support this garbage.
Fair enough, I know it was made known that Gerry B was on the group that came up with the paper, so just assumed he would have done so with the club’s backing.
-1 -
9 minutes ago, oneteaminglasgow said:
Even the most cursory glance shows that a number of these are completely fucking irrelevant to the “B teams help with youth development argument”
To take an example, Steven Zuber was 24 and had played over 100 Swiss top flight games and won a Russian Premier League before ever playing for a B team.
Granit Xhaka was 8 years old when he was at Concordia Basel, so I’m fairly confident in saying he never made a first team appearance for them.
Zinchenko had played a season of Russian top flight football before playing for a B team.
There’s others who don’t fit too, these are just the first 3 I saw.
Genuine question, what are your thoughts on your club supporting the idea?
0 -
3 minutes ago, oneteaminglasgow said:
Even the most cursory glance shows that a number of these are completely fucking irrelevant to the “B teams help with youth development argument”
To take an example, Steven Zuber was 24 and had played over 100 Swiss top flight games and won a Russian Premier League before ever playing for a B team.
Granit Xhaka was 8 years old when he was at Concordia Basel, so I’m fairly confident in saying he never made a first team appearance for them.
Zinchenko had played a season of Russian top flight football before playing for a B team.
There’s others who don’t fit too, these are just the first 3 I saw.
I thought you would be behind the B teams given your chief exec was one of the authors of the innovation paper.
-2 -
1 hour ago, Big Dougie said:
There is already a thread for the hatefest on this subject, the guy started a a constructive thread, if you don’t agree fair enough, but surely their should be room for all opinions?
Clearly not
-1 -
There is already a thread for the hatefest on this subject, the guy started a a constructive thread, if you don’t agree fair enough, but surely their should be room for all opinions?
-2 -
3 minutes ago, jamamafegan said:
f**k the colts and f**k this thread
So what is it you are trying to say?
0 -
14 hours ago, Big Dougie said:
You know that you will watch it out of morbid curiosity secretly admiring the might of the Queens chosen few, and the Popes Eleven.
It seems that a side effect of hating the Old Firm is that people develop a sense of humour bypass.
-1 -
1 hour ago, Marten said:
I hope they have a miserable season, just like their green & white mates...
You know that you will watch it out of morbid curiosity secretly admiring the might of the Queens chosen few, and the Popes Eleven.
-11 -
2 hours ago, parsforlife said:
Still Rats.
0 -
The BSC express makes another Stop at Stenny, creative signing policy.
0 -
14 minutes ago, Spyro said:
So was allowing any Colts/reserve teams into tier 5, but that got changed without any problems.
Yes, and your point?? The SFA review all rules and decide which ones to pass, it’s that simple.
0 -
2 hours ago, Dunfermline Jag said:
A bit of deflection from the Lowland League here, I think. This has been talked about for months but yesterday was the first time I had seen anyone say it was still subject to SFA approval. If players and clubs have made plans based on being led to believe that this was a done deal, they weren't being misled by the SFA.
In the meantime, all of the players born in 2002 have just seen up to 500 potential competitors, for promotion to their first teams next year, disappear! Its an ill wind that blows nobody any good.
Why wouldn’t it be subject to SFA approval, it’s a rule change!! If you are going to make accusations at least check the facts first.
0 -
1 hour ago, FairWeatherFan said:
The Exemptions guidance came out from the SFA on a Thursday afternoon. By the email that went round they contacted the SFA to confirm the standing of the Development League before making an statement on the matter.
The SFA got back to them the next morning at which point they clarified things to the Development League committee and clubs.
All in there was about an 18 hour, the majority of which would have existed outside normal office hours where clubs and onlookers wondered if the Development League could progress.
Talking sense will get you nowhere mate, it doesn’t suit the conspiracy theorists.
1 -
Is Gerry signing on for next season?
0 -
44 minutes ago, Ginaro said:
The two clubs who seemed to be most in favour of the Colts proposal have been given home ties on the first international weekend (i.e. one where there's usually a bigger attendance) against the B teams.
I think people are looking into this too much, the fixtures are done by the same guy who does the EoSFL, I’m not sure he would be taking too much notice of any “politics”.
0 -
2 minutes ago, Sergeant Wilson said:
I don't doubt the certified part.
You are quite correct to be honest
-1 -
1 minute ago, Sergeant Wilson said:
Not a rule, but you can multiquote. I'll teach you one day.
You are talking to a certified technophobe
-1 -
6 minutes ago, Sergeant Wilson said:
I preferred your deleted post "What a walloper". 5 consecutive posts do qualify you to identify wallpapers though.
I thought I would be benevolent and give you the benefit of the doubt.
. Apologies I wasn’t aware you weren’t allowed to post consecutively, another unwritten rule of P&B.
-1 -
5 hours ago, Ginaro said:
Double groundhop I see as well - first one in October looks like the same home clubs as the previous two March editions, then there's another one in March with Caley Braves involved. Is it EOS clubs still for the first one, with perhaps WOS clubs in the second one?
Caley Braves get Celtic as well.
I’m not sure what relevance that has.
-1 -
8 hours ago, peternapper said:
Who cares Lowland League has no credibility now anyway
You obviously care
-1 -
45 minutes ago, Deanburn Dave said:
Cannot understand all the negativity from some folk. The big story is for a lot of fans the competitive Fitbaw featuring their teams will soon be back ...... halle-fecking-lujah !!
It’s always the way in Scotland, some people aren’t happy unless there is something to bitch about.
-1 -
1 hour ago, Sergeant Wilson said:
SLFL Memo to Celtic and Rangers B Management:
Hi guys, thanks for letting us know where you'll be playing. Here's the fixture list, don't worry if any dates don't suit you we can always change them. Love the strips by the way, see you in hospitality. Can you let BSC and the other ones, the French team that play at the shows know?
Toodle Pip.
SLFL Memo to other clubs:
There yer fücking dinner!
I can only assume you are drunk, as none of that makes any sense whatsoever
-1
Bsc Glasgow
in Lowland League
Posted
Dry your eyes ffs
