Jump to content

Left Back

Gold Members
  • Posts

    6,711
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

4,057 Excellent

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. It amuses me to see you so rattled so while I thank you for your invitation I’ll ignore it and post on whatever thread I like. Now despite your ever lengthening posts trying to justify yourself I notice that you’ve never claimed anything I said was incorrect or false. I summarised your nonsense perfectly adequately and since then you’ve piped up with some more. If you really were that much of an expert and wanted to stick your neck out I’m sure you could ask the OP to DM you the details/paperwork so you could work your legal magic. You haven’t done that of course. You’ve typed a load of waffle and given more contradictory advice and opinions to try and justify your claim to be an expert.
  2. I’n not the one that claimed to be an expert so didn’t offer any advice. I’m curious. If you’re an expert why are you advising consulting a lawyer? If that isn’t the course of action you would take personally (with all your expertise) why advise someone else to do it? Perhaps you realise your opinion is actually worthless when it comes down to it despite you professing to be the font of all knowledge. This is because you know you have no clue what you’re talking about on this subject. I’m sure a solicitor is going to say “take the advice from the Internet expert. No need for me mate”. That’s how they make a living at the end of the day. Sending potential clients away with free advice so they no longer require a solicitor. Surely you weren’t advising consulting a solicitor to confirm it would cost more than the invoice value to retain a solicitor. I’m positive no-one would be that stupid… When you start flinging abuse at me for no reason other than you don’t get the basic concept of humour I’ll quite happily point out what a self important, egotistical clown you are.
  3. So to summarise what’s happened while I’ve been out. We have a poster who admits he’s not a lawyer, but claims to be an expert in the field that actual lawyers go to for advice about this, and his advice seems to be to go and see a lawyer before you do anything else. Presumably he’s hoping an actual lawyer can sort this out for you with the free 15 minute consultation he’s recommending.
  4. Even the draw puts France in pole position for 2nd I think. Wales away and England at home. I’d imagine 10 points from that barring more red cards.
  5. Trademark France implosion please.
  6. The one against France in the 6N last year. Flying headbutt from the French boy into Gilchrist (I think). The ref had to be talked into a red by Karl Dickson as TMO when the guidance was a lot clearer at the time as well.
  7. Thought that went out in the 22
  8. Don’t back down, double down. You started flinging insults at me and now you’re moaning that I reply? Wow. Not a lawyer then. Glad we established that. Enjoy the rest of your day.
  9. Red card could make this interesting.
  10. Stunning advice from a poster that’s regularly proven to be talking utter rubbish and now fancies himself as a lawyer.
  11. I see you’re branching out from making a tit of yourself in the politics forum. You’ll find spreading your wings pretty easy tbh.
  12. Odd decision that. When your scrum is going to be that dominant through sheer bulk you just pound away with it until the ref starts flashing cards no?
  13. That’s a shocking decision. Ball clearly hits Lamarro while Olivon is trying to gather it.
  14. Knocked that on to Lamarro surely?
×
×
  • Create New...