AJF

I could be wrong, but isn’t the £7 postage fee only if you select special delivery as the method? For our Semi Final I was £41 for the North Stand which includes a £1 web sales fee.

I'm assuming they are working on the basis that they expect Celtic to win the final meeting between the sides at Celtic Park if neither side slip up beforehand.

Aye, I think we seen the good and the bad from both managers really. Rodgers got his initial set up and tactics spot on while Clement’s was poor. Then Clement got his in game changes spot on where Rodgers made a mess of his.

Aye, McGregor and Yang sold the jerseys.

Well he does have first hand experience playing on it only a couple of days ago so I feel he is probably in a good position to comment on its condition

Celtic had our number the first half and should’ve been out of sight. By far the better side. Then they proceeded to chuck it.

I think it’s a tad silly to suggest players shouldn’t be a bit pleased they managed to salvage a draw in the fashion that they did when Celtic had it sewn up before capitulating, twice. The only one I felt went OTT was Silva and I said as much a few pages back.

Maybe I spoke too soon. Halliday on SSB saying he doesn’t think it’ll go ahead

Then maybe you don’t know your own team all that well then. Or maybe you tend to leave early. Regardless, you must’ve missed this ‘lap of honour’ after dropping points at home to Kilmarnock

What about when they drop points?

But what I mean is the players go round the ground after most games nowadays, assuming Clement wants it as a gesture of support for the fans (or those that are still there, anyway). It’s not something new that just happened yesterday.

This is also an odd one I’ve seen latched onto. The players go round the ground at the end of most games and don’t Celtic do the same?

Thankfully it seems Dundee are confident this will go ahead despite the weather warning that's in place so hopefully that will be the case. Think we've got to start Sima in this one if he is fit enough, while Matondo coming in would also be my preference. I felt we looked dangerous with them either side of the forward yesterday once Clement made the changes. Wright and Silva to drop to the bench.

I’m not disputing the fact he played for the foul, but I disagree he was on his way down before the contact. You can see in this clip at about 2:30, the view from behind the goal, that pretty clearly Johnston makes contact with Silva’s right knee before he goes down. You can actually see Johnston’s boot sort of ricochet back the way from the impact. It’s only after that Silva goes down.

I think that's where a degree of subjectivity will come into the equation as to whether Johnston getting a touch on the ball is regarded as him winning it despite it not changing it's course that much to the extent that Silva was likely going to retain possession.

Aye, I've seen them pop up a few times. Between them and the Celtic By Numbers lad, it's a full time occupation dedicated to conspiracies it seems.

Deary me

Possibly, though I can't say I blame them too much in wanting to avoid the games being title deciders as much as possible. I think they've made it a conscious effort since the split was introduced the year after the 1999 'Shame Game' at Celtic Park.

I really need to see this now very intrigued.

I see Madden is now in the firing line after giving his explanations as to why he believed all the calls made yesterday were correct. His review of the Rangers penalty says similar to what I mentioned - that it doesn't matter if Johnston got a touch if it hasn't changed the balls movement in any meaningful way.

In the context of “these games”, am I right assuming you mean games between Rangers and Celtic this season? If so, I can’t recall any incident where VAR has ruled in favour of Rangers/against Celtic prior to yesterday. Even going back to last season, I’m struggling to think of any.

Called it before the game. Against Hearts Beaton was the VAR and it was his fault and not the on-field referee. Yesterday it was also Beaton’s fault and not the VAR. So inconsistent in their attempt to manufacture their target to claim conspiracy

That’s it, play the man rather than the ball when you realise you’ve fucked it I also prefer follicly challenged

Even if that were the case then, do you just attribute his first quote to him, and just ignore the second ones? He is agreeing with you that it’s a penalty, yet you’re upset that he may have changed his mind about the decision?

I think I’ll stick with the above video, with quotes like: “I know with the rule it’s a penalty now” and “It’s a penalty, so I’ve nothing to say about the decision of the referee or VAR”