Roy McGregor brown stuff
Gold Members-
Posts
46 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
-110Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
The SPFL cannot afford the risk of a full hearing. They want this thrown out now. Failing that, it will be some form of out of court. Financial? Well I guess they’ll have to put that to a vote to all its members. Wonder if they’ll apply the 28 days according to their rule book? What then if it doesn’t pass? Reconstruction? What then if it doesn’t pass? Back to court & they lose money either way tho arguably if they won a full hearing (gamble) then members would be recompensed. Still the big but there.... It’s a mess. Not necessarily of the SPFL as an organisation’s making but certainly of its member clubs. As for being low on facts. The facts are there. Not my job to point out what you’ve missed or dont understand.
-
The dilution of funds was the main reason that many clubs voted against reconstruction. The prize money was given as a reason (in current Covid challenges) to finish season and get monies in. if it was £10m plus court costs (as I keep saying I don’t think it will ever see the light of day in full court hearing as out of court arbitration likely) then how many clubs likely to go the wall? I’ve heard that in next month there may well be at least one club calling in the administrators (brain surgery not required as to who ) . Your last point very valid. Their defence of “we’d rather the SFA are the arbitrary body” hasn’t gone too well so far I’d suggest: Better lawyers required in future if that’s all they’ve come up with!!
-
You obviously didn’t listen to any of the court hearing. Once again for the hard of hearing. Judge: What happens if Arbitration fails, it then comes back to court and the pursuers win the case but the season has commenced? Bowlyn QC for Dundee Utd: “The league would have to be halted''. Every which way as they say.