Jump to content

eibbod nehpets

Gold Members
  • Posts

    173
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by eibbod nehpets

  1. Yeah, it should. Ach, we'll see then won't we. You're welcome
  2. There's usually a button that says Block. Try pressing it.
  3. Yep you're right. Maybe the family who tidied up Terregles street end could do the other side too.
  4. Some clubs might not be in a position to "be too choosy." Us being a prime example.
  5. It makes more sense to train in Hamilton. A lot of players we sign stay in or around the central belt, the good majority of them won't want to travel that extra hour or so (on top of whatever already) to train 2/3 times a week and then again for the home game. We struggle to attract half decent players who put a shift in as it is - throw in that amount of traveling on a poor wage then there's no chance we'll attract decent players. As for attracting players south of the border - with the exception of some - I'd much rather we didn't go down that route again.
  6. I don't care if you have or haven't. Me referring to you jumping on the bandwagon was meant in general.
  7. Just because you say "any striker under 6 foot" doesn't make it true. It is. You're usually one of the first to jump on the bandwagon so of course you're disagreeing. Mate you're hilarious.
  8. So two players then aye? Read again. Or are you finding it difficult to name more than 2 strikers under 6 ft?
  9. It's only a few comments up but I'll answer you anyway if you're struggling. Murray got mentioned, someone pitched in that he plays better as a striker and then almost immediately after, someone else said he'd play better with a targer man. So there, the answer to your question is Murray. If you'd like to know who else this has been said about then basically every striker we've had under 6ft.
  10. I wonder if we'll ever get away from the idea that every striker we sign or whatever needs a target man beside him to play well..
×
×
  • Create New...