BILmac1967

Rang-yins are still cheating financially. Park and other directors giving soft loans to the club and getting them back as shares is financial cheating. Meet the new club, same as the old club. (in their dreams)

A big part of this argument is that people with dementia/ younger people with disabilities were looked after by their own families in the 1960's through the 70's but that changed as we became more materialistic, now we dump them on the NHS / "the state" in general. The people I grew up with as "socialists" now also want to have savings as well as keeping property, now we all rage when the gov. can't afford everything.

The people who chased him weren't his audience, they turned up to disrupt an advertised appearance. And you presume that the people who chased him couldn't be wrong?

I never said Farage should get more exposure, I pointed out that when he spoke, he was chased.

So you need to be elected to be on the telly? As an aside, iv;e never seen any of those far right headlines and images anywhere but on here.

Farage was denied free speech. At what point do the people who chased him ever admit they got any part of their argument wrong? I in part refer to a previous poster on here who pointed out that fascists aren't always right wing, but could end up as the same thing when in power.

Self defeating tripe, this could well be a perfect description of ignorance, as if those who regard themselves as tolerant in the first place could never be wrong

Googled it, NO - this presumes that those who regard themselves as tolerant and therefore above question were right in the first place- What was it that the intolerant people couldn;t live with? What makes you presume that the intolerant weren't victims in the first place?

Never heard of it, educate me, briefly.

If Farage held his ground, they would have respected his rights? Same as all the Scots who went to overthrow the elected government at Downing street and got kettled the first time Boris was elected, I suppose that was just high spirits?

He fled at the threat of violence, yes I would compare the two, not that I support Farage.

And yet Scottish nationalists are above question, in their own minds at least. Just like the nats who chased Nigel Farage out of a pub in Edinburgh in order to defend all that is right and good, protecting all of our freedoms by means of denying free speech. My point is that the nats, as well as the left, only ever create a political chasm whilst giving no answers to anything. These last number of pages seem to describe anyone who applies any kind of solution as far right wing, but the opposite, as far as I can see is just anti-political, completely open-ended, as if the UK should have no borders at all.

I seem to remember that Dundee was the only place where people tried to start a riot and looting when the London riots started in 2011, it never really took off though. The press always seemed to report Dundee as a very antisocial place with a big drug problem compared to it's size.

Albas plan is to stand beside the SNP and create a bigger indy vote overall. The conspiracy plan isn't happening fast enough, so a second indy party is created to ultimately get more floating voters to jump. Don't forget the Queen remains our head of state no matter how we vote, the Queen decides on a new referendum as soon as our version of the currency is downgraded and we rage that we've been conned and so we get a new referendum to rejoin the UK without the Barnett formula. It's always been the plan It's why the Queen remains our head of state no matter how we vote. It's also why they won't give us another referendum easily, we have to rage for a few years, convince ourselves independence was always our own idea.

Which party with a manifesto to re-run the referendum, I don't remember that?