Carl Jung

The one with the long hair. He featured in the 3-0 thumping in March, i recall. All things being equal, Montrose clearly had effectual quality in other areas to compensate for what you saw as a weak link- are we really going to assume they managed this by accident, and ignoring their deficiency? Montrose were of course involved in the first ever survival playoff three years prior to their league success- they have clearly learned not to bugger around with these things, and acted accordingly, and more than sufficiently to raise their level to a whole new (and more importantly higher) division. If our ambitions are, as they appear, along those lines- it's these small matters which need most attention. Disrepecting the league by assuming we'll manage along fine with inferior operatives is one of many reasons we remain anchored in it- and the wasted half a decade not even bothering to compete has bred a deeply negative attitude towards facing up to these realities.

What an odd composition of a question. Only been the once- wouldn't recommend.

My oh my. It appears that after the last two disastrous outcomes with managers- wherein concerned supporters questioned the situations at reasonable stages in our collapses, to be reprimanded and in many cases, publicly lynched- a sizable number have learned absolutely nothing. Those defending Currie, are generally among the same group supporting Ray Grant's secondment and yet lambasting Tom Lang, despite him undergoing the same shift from his natural position as the former. This seems rather strange given how merely asking a question of one thing, leads to a circling of the wagons for daring to criticise the manager's selections- and none of those for Currie are suggesting he's particularly great, just that he's the managers choice (by default as KH has been injured for a significant spell)- same as RG and indeed TL when coming in at right-back. Therefore, we must find reasons to suggest he's not at fault for any of our recent poor results. I don't know if 'toadying', or wishing not to cause offence is the main thing preventing open and honest discussion about Currie in particular (as i don't believe that many people actually rate him at all-), but given where sticking heads in the sand has gotten us in the previous full year before Lennon arrived, i'd expect people to have their priorities concerning the club straight- that being its welfare on the pitch.