Hugo

Are they saying that their method/criteria for picking managers works successfully? That they monitor performance continuously based on this method/criteria? And when the method/criteria shows that the method/criteria hasn't worked successfully to get the right manager, they will continue to apply the method/criteria to select the next manager? Whenever the method/criteria dictates that should happen?

It's not the impression your original post gave by a long way. You unfairly maligned the kid. You were clearly speculating. That doesn't do Berwick Rangers any favours in attracting good young talent on loan. Thank you for going some way to clarifying and correcting the record.

To be clear, the first manager told you directly? And then the second manager told you directly? That he has a bad attitude such that he treats it like a kick about with his mates?

I read what you said. Your audience can decide for themselves, on the evidence of the lad's performances, whether he was treating playing for Berwick as just a kick about with his mates. They can also make what they want of your throw away speculation about Forfar. I will simply repeat my comment that your post is incorrect, except for the fact that he did ask to leave. Like the manager who signed him asked to leave. And like, it seems, a few other players. Question your sources.

Who's your source for saying Cedwyn has a bad attitude? It seems you can't be associated with Berwick without getting caught up in character assassination. This comment from Disc Potato is completely wrong, except for the fact that Cedwyn was not sent back. I asked Disc Potato for his source of information about Forfar. He hasn't answered. The idea that Cedwyn thought playing for Berwick was like a kick about with his mates is clearly fanciful nonsense. Where does anybody get that idea from? He ended with 4 goals in 6 starts with a top goals to minutes ratio, all the more remarkable given Berwick has been described as the worst performing team North and South of the border. When a club is bumping along at the bottom of the league, the manager resigning, numerous players getting sent off weekly, a wholly unfit assistant manager filling in and then getting the hook at half time, fans angry and frustrated, would you want a player to express some honest words in a frank dressing room conversation? Or keep his head down and not say a single word that might be construed by someone somewhere as rocking the boat? Which is the good attitude? Which is the bad attitude? The lad left home at 15 in the hope of making a career playing the game he loves, and worked hard to win a professional contract with Huddersfield Town at age 18. On the back of winning a fans award at Dundee FC for his performances in the under 20s, he went on to make first team appearances off the bench in the Scottish premiership. Anyone peddling the idea that he would treat his first professional starts at a proud football club like Berwick Rangers as kick abouts with his mates clearly has no idea about him. That person needs to question the sources of their information.

Not sure where this information about Cedwyn Scott comes from? The only accurate bit is that he wasn't sent back. He asked to go back. The rest is seriously incorrect. As for checking his minutes on the pitch at Forfar, what's your point? What are we meant to take from this? What's your inside knowledge of events at Forfar? You're right. You said it. "Berwick Rangers is a fantastic football club ... that is having a real shit time. Frustration and anger is getting the better of all of us ... " So if a manager or player doesn't get frustrated and angry in such circumstances, would you say he had a good or a bad attitude? Would you want him to express "strong words" in a frank exchange or sit quiet, keep his head down, not rock the boat and treat it as a "kick about with his mates"? It can't be both.