the more i think about whether to keep the mcglynn or not, i find myself always leaning to the latter. Even if mcglynn brings in the players we want, i feel his stubbornness to change tactics (even just having a plan B in the first case) will forever be his (and our) downfall. All it takes is for one game to knock the team's confidence and mcglynn will still play the same tactics that only a team in confidence can pull off.
There is no way that mcglynn will change his ways (i pray he does however) as it has been made abundantly clear that he has one tactic, one formation, in mind that he expects the players to play. And as we seen, when teams figure us out, as they have done every season after the first run of games, we crumble.
So i feel that no matter how good his team is (unless it goes unbeaten) will still fail to get us up. Unless of course we bring in a manager who is adaptable, has at least a few tactics for different scenarios, or mcglynn changes his ways. People saying maybury and kerr, and it could be a good fit as i believe they've played a few solid formations over the season. However, i'm hopeful to be proven wrong!
Edit:
i'm also aware of the costs in binning mcglynn and bringing a new manager. Hence why i'm hopeful mcglynn changes his stubbornness