Jump to content

falkirkzombie

Gold Members
  • Posts

    935
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by falkirkzombie

  1. that was night and day to what we have been watching the last 2-3 years, disappointing to lose the late goal but early season signs are encouraging, starting to feel a little optimistic about our chances this season.
  2. Alloa 2-2 East Fife Dumbarton 2-0 Airdrie Falkirk 1-0 Peterhead Montrose 3-1 Clyde Queens Park 2-1 Cove
  3. Enjoyed my day out yesterday, the celebrations at the goal is what av been missing the last 18month. With a decent front man we win that game comfortably. Nesbit going to be our main man this season I feel. Agree with others that Kenna looked good when he came on, haven't written him off yet, but his injury record is worrying, we need someone else in.
  4. What smoker do you have? Kamado joe, this is my new hobby I picked up over lockdown and now I am a little obsessed.
  5. Done beef short ribs at the weekend on the smoker and was right chuffed with them, thought i'd share.
  6. Airdrie 2-1 Montrose Clyde 2-2 Dumbarton Cove 2-1 Falkirk East Fife 2-3 Queens Park Peterhead 0-0 Alloa
  7. Having full backs that can get up the pitch makes such a massive difference.
  8. Corzos player analytics working a treat here.
  9. If he has showed up well in the bounce games and training by all means take a punt on him if the the management team likes him but a 2 year f****ng deal???...WTF?!?
  10. That's a good appointment IMO, he done a great job at Stenny and seems to be well liked. Pretty happy with that.
  11. @Back Post Misses will correct me if I'm wrong but I don't see him or anyone else pushing for Rawlins out. I voted for the Rawlins deal and like most was quite optimistic about their involvement but was left disappointed he and the rest of the board never took the opportunity create the three legged stool approach everyone has been banging on about - this may still happen and I'm waiting for more details about how this Falkirk Supporters Society will be involved. As for getting excited about going back to games again each to their own but thinking long standing supporters of the club would like to see us fail this season in rubbish.
  12. nonsense, absolutely everybody on here wants the club to succeed, if some have reservations at how the club is being run or the current transfer activity that's their prerogative, also the "peddling of agendas" goes both ways on here.
  13. it been answered before but they agreed to work with Holt after the BOD backed him, they originally wanted him replace/removed.
  14. I think your being a bit disingenuous, not once have i seen it described as "free money" on here. I was aware that it was the group that walked away as the board weren't willing to compromise at all just from reading stuff on here so not quite sure why that was a surprise to people. In the end the 2 parties could not agree with each other and both moved on, I personally think the club made a mistake in that but that's only my opinion. BMP has answered your other points and it not the 1st time he or others have made that info available. The one thing I did agee in what GC said last night was getting into entrenched positions on this isnt going to help anyone, they couldn't come to an agreement - everybody moves on - lets just hope that PS has the tools and backing to get finally get us out of this league.
  15. 100%, actually the rest r coming across well, GD not so much.
  16. Home one is actually pretty smart - away one is crap and looks more like a training top, just a bit weird without central demo on the front.
  17. Yep, at least it looks like we have a competent coaching team in place this season, a good start to the season will make a lot of the disconnect at the club subside.
  18. has this group been put together by the board? I think I remember filling out the survey but herd nothing about it since.
  19. it way well be a great thing long term but IMO it lacks what is needed most at them moment, an injection of hard cash into the clubs coffers to get out this f***ing league.
  20. TBF to the group that process would have undoubtedly taken place if all had been agreed with the board, if its not happening its up to individuals if u wish to make their names public. I know that for a few ( can't speak for everybody on the group) that the money pledged would be looked as as nothing more than a donation - the chance to help the club get back to where it should be was the overwhelming aim.
  21. Pretty incredible to think that the club cud have an extra 600k in the bank going into this season if our chairman just done the decent thing and resigned after last seasons capitulation, if fact he could have walked away claiming to have delivered on his remit to bring extra investors into the club - how in any way can he justify that that decision was in the best interests of the club?
  22. I was struck at one of the virtual AGM/EGM that when asked the question, they confirmed that nobody on the board at that time had any shares in the club.
×
×
  • Create New...