St.Inan

Typical comment from you that has nothing to do with my opinion about Connor moving on, but if you think it won't lessen our chances then that's your opinion and your entitled to it. If you want to talk about my inspiration come and speak to me and we can discuss some of your inspirational moments over the years, it looks like you take a smug reaction to trying to identify me without naming me well that's the kind of discussion I prefer to have in private face to face so come and speak to me anytime you feel like it.

If you read my post you will see I said "will reduce their chance" but I still hope they can win it and always will, but Darvel and St. Cadoc's look better equipped in respect of Player Pool & Quality than Beith do now.

Certainly will reduce the chance of Beith Retaining their Title, Beith are losing too many quality players at the wrong time

Might help Burgh to win the title but will more likely see Beith lose their title, losing too many Quality players.

Thanks for that Glensmad, very helpful for me anyway, are the Constitution & Rules available on the West of Scotland website or anywhere else?

Might be useful if the processed was described, for example what comments/ evidence needs to be collected and taken into account/consideration, who is involved in the process (no individuals need to be mentioned and should not be) and what the timescales are in order to comply with any rules protocols etc. Not asking to compromise the situation in anyway just a general note of the procedural requirements and no mention of any actual cases mentioned, can't see that that would be too difficult to do and might just allay some of the criticism. Asking for genuine constructive reasons and actually believe it would be helpful to everyone.

Reckon the clue is in their use of the word think. If they knew it was Pollok it wouldn't be there. It's in the past anyway and not worth worrying about. As Boris said on "Partygate" NO RULES WERE BROKEN, The ethical question though is was what was done in the best interest of the situation and who knew why it was being done? Is this not a similar ethical situation and questions need to be asked as to who knew what they were doing and more importantly why they were doing it, particularly if it was someone who was setting the rules. So if anyone who was directly involved has the integrity and is prepared to be honest then step forward, I for one don't see that happening so need to ensure it can't happen again, bit ironic if the potential situation had previously been identified and rules were in place to prevent it from happening that these rules were not in place to prevent it in this instance. Wonder what the SFA or Scottish Leagues view will be or would be if it happened in any of the Leagues under their durisdiction and if they are looking on from above.

If clubs who had the option not to play need support why are they playing? I suspect some of the clubs who are playing are quite healthy financially and must have taken that into consideration when they made their choice, would it be right that they receive tax payers money when they can survive financially. It was their choice and they were probably aware of the consequences. You could argue that clubs who choose not to play because of the Financial consequences are equally entitled to any monies from the public purse that are available due to loss of earnings, that's probably why anything given must be a loan to be paid back to the public purse. There may also be clubs who are OK financially but took the decision not to play for other reasons but are still missing out as all clubs are with the income streams that are not available due to the restrictions. I would feel really strongly if money from the public purse were paid out to assist Football clubs who had a relatively healthy bank balance, if assistance is needed then it should only be the needful and not as a means of profiteering from a dreadful health pandemic.

I assume you have inside information or just a skewed opinion, do you know what the facts are or just looking to get a reaction, what majority are you talking about, don't think that has been disclosed, spill the beans before someone tells the truth.