Jump to content

Meth Damon

Gold Members
  • Posts

    807
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Meth Damon

  1. Personally hate the shouts for a Manny-Loma fight though, there's 3 weight classes between them. Maybe if Loma went up to 135 and beat Linares or Flanagan but don't see the point in rushing away from such a stacked division.

  2. Saw an interview with Blackwell a few days ago seemed so down not to be able to box again, get why he'd want to get in for a spar. As J Stewart says though it's on everyone around him to stop it, how anyone could get in and hit him back only a few months after he's out of a coma is beyond me.

  3. 3 hours ago, LargsTON said:

    That's fucking mental emoji23.pngemoji23.pngemoji23.png

    Got to imagine that's a lot of Haye's doing, for all of Eddie's faults he tends to keep ticket prices lowish. The most expensive Froch Groves 2 ticket was £1500 apparently 

  4. Get Bellew stripped of that WBC belt and let 2 cruisers fight for it, Briedis-Huck would be a good fight but there's a ton of decent fights that could be made for it. If Bellew wants to perform some WWE shit then get fucked up by Haye whilst Ladbible spunks themselves silly that's fine but he shouldn't be allowed to hold that belt hostage in one of the most stacked divisions. 

    It's another mismatch when we could've been setting up good fights (Bellew-Briedis and Haye vs the winner of Parker-Ruiz) that'll be covered over by the two of them shouting at each other at press conferences and needing to be split up at the weigh in.

  5. 2 hours ago, Meth Damon said:

    IMG_20161120_161933.jpg

    Scoring the fight as a SD :lol:

    But wait... there's more

    IMG_20161120_185142.jpgIMG_20161120_185146.jpgIMG_20161120_185148.jpg

     

    Robert Hoyle had Hooker beating Perez 97-93 and Mcdonnell beating Solis 118-110, couple of pretty inexcusable scorecards within a week of each other

  6. 34 minutes ago, The Chlamydia Kid said:


    Rewatch it on American telly on YouTube. Even up the commentator bias.

    Aye this is a good idea, I'd rather no commentary but you need the noise to hear the punches 

  7. 2 minutes ago, The Chlamydia Kid said:


    3rd was very tight could have went either way I just thought Ward edged the exchanges on balance. And 12th I couldn't split.

    Aye neither were clear at all, don't know if it affects people's thinking to see Ward doing better after such a disastrous start. 3rd round he did really well to stop the onslaught but I still thought Kovalev won the round

  8. 17 minutes ago, The Chlamydia Kid said:

    Just rewatched it and had it 115-113 Kovalev.
    1-Kovalev
    2-Kovalev 10-8
    3- Ward
    4- Kovalev
    5- Kovalev
    6- Kovalev
    7-Ward
    8-Ward
    9- Ward
    10- Kovalev
    11-Ward
    12- split.

    The only rounds I thought there was a clear winner was 1,2,4 and 8. The rest you could make a case for either man.


    On my second viewing I have Kovalev round 5 where before I gave it to Ward and I gave a winner in 10 and 11 that I'd given even splits before.

    Had the same with Kovalev winning 3rd and 12th, think you have to be giving Ward every benefit of the doubt to have hin winning 7 rounds

×
×
  • Create New...