SANTAN

Quite. Hope was all they had, I tried to warn you guys @Jinky67 Enjoy your nights

Balogun thing is a bit shite. He was terrible last season there and we had to change things at half time previously. Buzzing to see Kent in there though. Hopefully he won't have lost the motivation to relentlessly murder your defence because Scott Brown has moved on.

What do you mean by inferior?

Things you love to see.

Yeah I do get that. Generally if I wasn't interested in the teams I would prefer two teams going at it, like I do actually agree with you to an extent I just do like seeing a top team like City dismantle a former top team, probably wouldn't have enjoyed it as much if it was against Southampton or something.

I can't think of much worse that could happen. Imagine finishing your graft driving home and that happens.

I dunno for me it does depend, by your logic you wouldn't enjoy watching prime Barcelona or pretty much any of the worlds best era teams because they're so much better than the opposition.

Nice to see the yes side get a big win.

I meant what I said. It was a cracking game because Man City are cracking to watch and they were strutting their stuff.

I'll take your word for it. Turned over at HT. A one-sided game is only narrowly beaten by a turgid 0-0 in the "Shite types of game to watch" for me. Each to their own. I personally don't know how you could not enjoy watching the way City play. Potentially the best manager in the world with some of the best players in the world.

Cracking game to watch.

Just think they're actually filming an All or Nothing series for Amazon. They might need to rebrand it at this point.

Another cracking article by the big man. Could've done without the homophobia directed towards Patrick Harvie though...

Good for them, hopefully they all move to City for over £100M

Hope the Grealish deniers enjoyed that one. Lovely run. What a man.

I think he'll go this weekend.

Feel sorry for Smith-Rowe everytime he gets the ball there's 3 guys on him and no Arsenal player looks bothered to go near him.

So we don't know for certain if the staff would have even been able to leave or how at risk they actually are. Glad that's been cleared up. Again, the whole thing is ridiculous but I think the ridiculousness of using resource to evacuate animals over humans is the main take away, the whole "what about the staff" seems relativley minor and can be filed alongside the overall tragic humanitarian cost caused by the military failure.

Yeah I understand all of that but my specific point is whether or not the staff would have been allowed on the plane anyway? As I also said you'd imagine there is some risk level approach to who gets priority. Of course it's ridiculous to allow the flight rather than ones with potential human passengers I'm just saying maybe after that decision had been made it wasn't possible to take his staff with him on board anyway.

I've not really followed the story but why would the Afghan staff of rescue dogs be at the front of the process? I'm not saying the dogs should be of course but I'm guessing the whole evacuation process differentiates from humans and animals. Is there some risk level done to who is getting evacuated? I can't see animal shelter employees being at the top of the Taliban hit list.

Wut.

10am - 8pm is my acceptable times.