Clarkston5

This guys is the most stupid of all posters and that's including SSI, Panda, Colgimbecile and Baxter......sheeeeeeeeesh

I see that I'm talking to people who don't know anything about history or indeed its habit of repeating itself. Until there are some people who take the time to read and understand, I'm out.....Most of you are thick

I suppose the answer is No because you haven't presented a counter argument which explains German intervention in Europe

I never said I was proud of it. Try reading and stop posting......

go away rico

No I'm not actually because Salmond wanted to join the EU. Immigration in terms of open borders without any controls that we set up. For example we have a skills shortage we should be able to enable people with those skills to come in and as for context and history in this debate, these are obviated by all liberals. We now have a generous benefits system which can be taken advantage of as well as health care which can also be taken advantage of. I think anyone who comes here is right to take advantage of these and I treat them with the same respect i treat everyone with when i come across them. It's the inept politicians I take issue with. They are indeed failures. As for Germany, did you know that they recruited Bolsheviks in 1917 and indeed one famous one to instigate a revolution? Also Merkel warned Russia about Ukrainian intervention which I'm surprised at because they played their hand. normally they let the US and the UK use the "warning" rhetoric. Germany have always wanted to control Europe and they are doing a good job

I think UKIP are a joke of a party but the majority of people do want some controls placed on immigration. In the US, they don't talk about "NET" immigration. It's absolutely ridiculous that we can't decide on our own governance and is another example of Germany running Europe (dictating terms on debt and immigration etc). I said that economic and political control of Europe including the Eastern European countries has been Germany's aim since 1917 and it's continued apace. Only now they do it in a peaceful way, making the odd threat of expulsion if anyone disagrees with them.

Not feminism. It's Charlie Webster. She's an attention seeker. "I made a mistake" is fine when it's of a matter of little consequence but in this context, she's a joke and like you a bad one. That "tit" thing, that's you although SSI is a bigger one tbf.

I'm chilled. you're pathetic and emoticons to try and get a response? Yep childish nonsense. It is of no consequence that "she didn't know". That could be her being economical with the truth. As for where society is. Webster was criticized by her work colleagues for the FHM photo shoot and they work in the media. Add thick to pathetic = you

I think admitting her mistake was very "big" of her. However she's endorsed a convicted rapist who happens to be a sportsman and then she wants to condemn another. A "mistake" like that is one that means she has no credibility. There was no link to the FHM photo shoot but it's another example of her lack of credibility. She claims to be a feminist and the feminist movement abhor that because it allows women to be objectified. Calling people "creepy" Just what I thought, you're pathetic

Ah you missed out the Mike Tyson reference you cheeky little chappie. That's why she's a hypocrite but as for posing for girlie photos which objectify the model and then claiming to stand for "equality", I'd say that's a confused view to have. Her article in The New Statesman was particularly hilarious; "we need to include everybody" but she did say she was "confused". Yep spot on about that yin. Right that's me finished with that. You should never leave out the key part of an argument and then try being a wido.

Really? I take it you mean Charlie Webster? The same person who tweeted about how great Mike Tyson is. The same person who posed for FHM and yet claims to stand for equality for women. Charlie Webster is an attention seeking idiot. Same with Russel Brand (hope you don't mind me going back on topic?) who slavers about equality and yet earns millions, doesn't donate any REALLY serious wedge of that to his "charities" and then doesn't mind immigration without any controls which is what people actually want. Then we can stop talking about "NET" immigration. Unfortunately we can't stop talking about the hypocritical BS that comes from the liberal left which includes whoppers like "progressive society" and "fair and diverse"..........."as long as you agree to all our contradictions which we don't understand ourselves"

Hiya Rico

Nah it was more along the lines of nobody caring except Charlie Webster who is a mass of contradictions much like the entire political liberal left. Women are better at some and as good as men at certain things and vice versa. The feminist mob don't want to allow that distinction. That IS mad

Nice to see you venting your leftie extreme views Rico. Did you catch the SPOTY awards? Charlie Webster gave a one woman standing ovation to the women's rugby team. Tremendous stuff eh? We need to pretend to enjoy watching these sports and indulging people who have no idea what they're doing because otherwise we'll be like Nazi Germany in no time. As for UKIP, they're a joke of a party but the issues they raise are shared by many people so we need to ignore them all in the interests of equality