robo2

exactly the same, hope that helps

the club employed players and owned a stadium pre 1899 when a different structure was in place, after this point the club created a company to do this, at no point after 1899 have we been without a company to do this, we changed companies in 2012 and remained the same club according to all the legal experts who commented on it - an absolutely easy answer from me backed up with proof - what possible reason did you have for thinking this question was even remotely challenging?

it was mentioned numerous times three years ago

neither of them suffered a similar fate to rangers, no-one attempted to buy ardrie or fiorentina, leeds, hearts and a number of other english clubs transferred the club to a newco and liquidated the oldco and continued on as usual without a peep about them being a new club. which was an identical situation to rangers

the only mental gymnastics come from the new club delusionals, the facts are, what has happened to rangers has happened to other clubs before, they are the same clubs and no-one made a peep about this new club pish regarding them, officially we are the same club according to every footballing organisation home and abroad, legally we are the same club according to the evidence available. That "ethereal entity with no legal personality v company" stuff you have trouble with has been backed by two judges who have more knowledge about the law than you a thicko on a message board could ever dream of, they say it makes perfect sense and also that is what happened in rangers case, added to that hmrc, the stock market and all other business organisations who have commented on it says we have surived. in opposition to that backing the new club stuff, you have some newspaper headlines + some ex pros offering their opinion (both examples of non experts, who have since stated that we are the same club) and a mythical law that not one of you can provide and a few crackpot theories that dont stand the slightest scrutiny and are contradicted by the available credible evidence - the whole new club strategy is based on ignoring that absolutely every single bit of evidence backs the stonewall fact that we are the same club, then repeating various flawed arguments over and over again until someone points out your stupidity and then you move onto the next one until you get back to the start

we are 2 points, 7 goals and +7 in the goal difference better off than hearts were at this stage in the season last year, we are also a round further than hearts managed to get in the challenge cup last year - based on the stats so far its pretty clear we are better than hearts last year

laugh away dummy, my point still stands, the club survived, only an idiot would believe otherwise with every credible legal and business source saying we survived and every footballing organisation officially recognising us as the same club, you have not one single credible source that can contradict this and thats the facts :lol: :lol:

oh dear indeed, you have just outed yourself as an idiot, well done

nope the old company is in lquidation, the club survived, only an idiot would believe otherwsie considering all the evidence backs the club surviving

'Rangers coming is a big occasion for the club and the town of course. The last time they played Cowdenbeath in a league game was April 1971.' he makes it pretty clear that we are legally the same club in that article with the quote above, his point of view it that is wasnt the same club bcause of the scumbags running it, that has now changed

nothing to do with the fact we are the best supported team in the land as last years tv figures show, just you continue talking pish though, you moronic chimp

it makes perfect sense unless you are a idiot, which is why every credible source who has commetned on it says we survived, what bit are you having trouble with? and what evidence from credible sources do you have to back your new club pish?

and every other organisation that has commented on it - amount of organisations that back your new club shyte - 0

are you two muppets the same person - same shyte patter, same inability to constract a coegent argument for your outlandish insane views, same obsession with rangers

chased you from the new club thread didnt i though, still wating on your explaination of why you say "I see my club as starting from 1874." when they went through the same process of liquidation of oldco and transfer of the club to newco in 1905 that rangers did in 2012. either Hearts were founded in 1905 and Rangers in 2012 or they are both the same clubs they have always been since inception, which one is it?