Jump to content

bluebell1

Gold Members
  • Posts

    248
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by bluebell1

  1. Best Team we’ve played this season.  Pace and energy going forward frightening at times.  We never really tested the backline.  No complaints beat by far the better side although a thought our sending off at start of 2nd half was a bit harsh.  The players first booking wasnt a foul.  2nd booking right after was a foul and deserved a booking.  
     

    Well looked after all day by a class club with nice people.  A special mention to the social club guy who thanked the bluebell supporters saying were the only club this season who have brought a crowd into the club.  Some stayed there all game to be fair.

  2. 13 hours ago, lithgierose said:

    This weather playing havoc with phone. How did Johnny Harvey's team get on ?

    Vastly improved from start of season.  There goalkeeper is excellent. Surprised that they had basically no support at the game in what was as poor a crowd as we have had at Moorside in a long time. Weather obviously a factor.  Best team won 

  3. 1 minute ago, Che Dail said:

    Just for your own good really.  Hardly anyone agrees with your points. 

    You're the most agitated and demanding poster on this thread - I'm curious as to why you're so animated about something that doesn't affect your club in the slightest... what's your vested interest?

    That’s the issue in a nutshell a don’t have any vested interest what yours sweetheart

  4. 13 minutes ago, Che Dail said:

    You're a Club Official, in a SFA Licensed Club, but not interested in the League Constitution and Rules as if they don't apply to you, WTF???

    See the Code of Conduct your club signed up to on P4: https://www.eosfl.com/downloads/eosfl/EoSFL-Policies-2020.pdf

    What are the 'Proper channels' for getting yer brass neck wound back in? 😅😅 

    A leave the constitution stuff to more capable people than me in all honesty.  

  5. 1 hour ago, GordonS said:

    A few thoughts...

    1) It's democratic because everyone entitled to a vote got a vote. Everyone knew that you don't get a vote in the first year when they joined, and everyone that joined had the same rule.

    2) If any club had wanted new clubs to be able to vote in their first year they could have proposed that. AFAIK no club did. So what you're arguing for is a vote in breach of the EoSFL constitution. What's that word you're fond of? Shambles?

    3) Even if every club that wasn't able to vote had voted, and had voted for your favoured option, you'd still have lost. You're venting anger over something that would literally have made zero difference anyway.

    4) Of course your opinion is for the benefit of the pyramid. Everyone's is. But you're choosing to assuming that your opinion is the only valid one and all others are wrong. Not just wrong, corrupt. That's really, really disrespectful. The decision made wasn't the one I would have chosen either, but this was an issue with no wrong answers and I respect the right of all the clubs to come to their own conclusions. If you can't see how it's fair enough to prefer to end the season now, save the players from a frenzy of football in June, save the clubs from losing more money with matches behind closed doors and be more ready for the new season in July, then it's because you're choosing not to.

    5) You're alleging that those who voted null and void did so out of self-interest, but that couldn't possibly explain the overwhelming vote in favour of it. There are obviously clubs who thought this was the right way to go even though it wasn't in their interests.

    6) As an official of a member club I think it's pretty inappropriate to be as insulting to other member clubs and to league officials as you've been.

    Don’t think I have been insulting to anyone just offering an opinion which differs from others.  If any other club thinks that what I have said is insulting well so be it, a won’t lose sleep over it.  It’s an opinion.  
     

    A don’t agree with everything the league officials do either but don’t hide and happily tell them my opinion. I certainly don’t think calling the decision a shambles is insulting. It’s my belief. I also never mentioned the word corrupt you did.

    A still firmly believe voting across all of Scottish football not just the eosl is always done with self interest and not for the good of the game/pyramid.  I am also a firm believer that an elected management committee should be empowered to make all decisions without asking clubs to vote.

    I also felt the season should never have started but we did start and I believe we should have played 50% to determine relegation and promotion on the park but this hasn’t been agreed and I accept it.  No shouting for another vote from me but I also think the rule that clubs can’t vote for a year when joining is wrong and needs addressed.

    A don’t know the ins and outs of the league constitution and in all honesty am no that interested in it. But you whoever you are seem to have a grasp of it and if there’s proper channels for change of current rules then a think that needs to happen in the correct format you have alluded to.

     

  6. 3 minutes ago, TheGeneral10 said:

    As a club official you are making a rip roaring t£&t of yourself now tbh. Of course it was democratic and to state otherwise shows ignorance and stupidity of the highest order. Never got your way. Dummy spat. Toys out the pram. 

    Ach well, have enjoyed the last week or so on here. But your correct as a club official a maybe shouldn’t post.  It is what it is, don’t agree with the decision nor the way it was done, raises more questions than answers but need to get on with it a suppose. 

    Looking forward to meeting you next season general and aw the best to burnie as well.  Parties in dunbar and Blackburn tonite and here’s me being old skool and hoping football is decided on the park .  Vote to play surely 
     

  7. 6 minutes ago, TheGeneral10 said:

    You got ur vote so it was democratic. Your club is no worse off and no better off, as is every club. Stop moaning FFS. At least we all know what’s happening now. 

    It’s not democratic when certain clubs aren’t allowed to vote surely. My opinion is on the benefit of the pyramid. Am not looking at it from a bluebell perspective.  You and burnie should maybe look at it outwith your club perspective 

  8. 4 minutes ago, Burnieman said:

    Just like you weren't allowed to vote during the first year of your EoS membership either 🙄

    Does that make it correct ? Surely needs challenged.

    Surely all clubs should be allowed a vote.

    My understanding is no votes at agm or egm for clubs in year one. But this vote surely should be for all clubs.

    Blackburn still in the premier congrats 

  9. Why is the “management” committee not make a decision.  Why is the vote to null and void or play only.  Why is declaring on ppg not a voting option. 

    An absolute shambles for me, gotta play now give a club the chance of promotion and get the leagues sorted for a 16 team premier league august start.

  10. 4 minutes ago, TheGeneral10 said:

    🤣🤣 We are on the same page then, so we are both happy.
    I’m not hiding behind anything though. I’m merely a supporter and personally find your actions underhand and disingenuous. I’d feel the same if the club I watch/ support were benefiting - that’s the truth as it is who I am. There are no accusations, only opinions and all based on my own standards and belief that all member clubs are essentially in the same boat, facing the same challenges and as such there is a respectful way of behaving that should be inclusive. Next time you visit the club, if I’m there I will most certainly introduce myself and perhaps even buy you that free pint you mentioned previously. 
    I guess all I hoped for was a little bit of contrition from you in the cold light of day after some time to reflect. Sadly not. 

    Ok we will agree to disagree,  and I look forward to seeing you at Dunbar in the future and will happily accept that free pint on offer. Tennants preferably, a might buy you one back. 

  11. 19 minutes ago, TheGeneral10 said:

    If you wrote that email my friend and your conscience is clear, then your moral compass compared to my own are not even in the same vicinity, and all I will say is I’m glad I’m me. 
    Like you say what will be will be. 

    Pathetic, you my friend are a man/woman of straw.  Throwing accusations and comments around hiding behind a username kinda makes you insignificant in my world 

  12. 9 minutes ago, TheGeneral10 said:

    I assume you never wrote the email from your club? 

    It is very clear who wrote the email you refer to as said before if all clubs want to see it contact me and I will happily discuss or copy them in.  I am the general manager of the bluebell.  
     

    I assume you have an identity also ?

  13. 27 minutes ago, Burnieman said:

    See, I find it surprising that a club who flip flopped like a demented fish between staying Junior or going to the EoS, U-turning more than once and only at the last minute reluctantly joining, are now imploring everyone to look at the bigger picture and preaching what is good for the Pyramid.

    Forgive me if that sticks in throat a wee bit.

    I have a Similar feeling  to your constant preaching about what’s good for the pyramid as long as it suits Blackburn.  

    what will be will be.

  14. After a request by the management board for points to raise at next board meeting.

    Our proposal for consideration was circulated to some clubs not all as a way to gauge other clubs thoughts on implementing a tiered league structure by declaring the season on ppg. I am happy to forward to all clubs if that is so desired. 

    The feedback was mostly positive with other points raised and some negative feedback also.

    As suggested here nothing is underhand, I was advised that if we wanted to call an egm to discuss we need 10 clubs to second our proposal.  We have achieved this although after further discussion our thought process is we are happy to go with the decision of the management committee after Thursdays meeting. 
     

    Would I have made this proposal is Dundonald would have been relegated as a result possibly not.  If proposal came in was accepted and we were duly relegated a would get on with it as firmly believe a league structure is required ASAP.

    I don’t hide behind user names and happy to discuss with anybody any issues or concerns they have.  I am easily contactable.

    Self preservation is understandable but surely we need to be bigger than that and look at the end goal on pyramid structure not what’s in front of our nose.  Look at the bigger picture.

    As for not being made welcome at certain clubs if the proposal is implemented as suggested by a poster on here. I am big enough and ugly enough not to let that bother me to be honest.  I might get a free pint from others.

    Change effects everyone sometimes positively and other times negatively.  We still need to embrace it if it’s for the greater good.

     

×
×
  • Create New...